Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Mantitheus Against Boeotus I

Mantitheus Against Boeotus I (1-5)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg039.perseus-eng2:1-5
Refs {'start': {'reference': '1', 'human_reference': 'Section 1'}, 'end': {'reference': '5', 'human_reference': 'Section 5'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

It was not from any love of litigation I protest by the gods, men of the jury, that I brought this suit against Boeotus, nor was I unaware that it will seem strange to many people that I should bring suit because somebody thought right to have the same name as myself; but it was necessary to have the matter decided in your court, in view of the consequences that must result if I do not get this matter righted.

If the defendant declared himself the son of another father and not of my own, I should naturally have seemed meddlesome in caring by what name he chose to call himself; but, as it is, he brought suit against my father, and having got up a gang of blackmailers[*] to support himMnesicles, whom you all probably know, and that Menecles who secured the conviction of Ninus,[*] and others of the same sorthe went into court, alleging that he was my fathers son by the daughter of Pamphilus, and that he was being outrageously treated, and robbed of his civic rights.

My father (for the whole truth shall be told you, men of the jury) feared to come into court lest someone, on the ground of having elsewhere received some injury from him in his public life, should confront him here; and at the same time he was deceived by this mans mother. For she had sworn that if he should tender her an oath in this matter, she would refuse it, and that, when this had been done, all relations between them would be at an end; and she had also had money deposited in the hands of a third party on her behalf[*];—on these conditions, then, my father tendered her the oath.

But she accepted it, and swore that not only the defendant, but his brother too, her other son, was my fathers child. When she had done this it was necessary to enter them among the clansmen,[*] and there was no excuse left. My father did enter them; he adopted them as his children and (to cut short the intervening matters) he enrolled the defendant at the Apaturia[*] as Boeotus on the list of the clansmen, and the other as Pamphilus. But I had already been enrolled as Mantitheus.

My fathers death happened before the entries were made on the register of the demesmen,[*] but the defendant went and enrolled himself on the register as Mantitheus, instead of Boeotus. How great a wrong he did in thisto me, in the first place, but also to youI shall show, as soon as I have brought forward witnesses to prove my assertions.

The Witnesses

It 1 w 2
was 1 w 5
not 1 w 8
from 1 w 12
any 1 w 15
love 1 w 19
of 1 w 21
litigation 1 w 31
I 2 w 32
protest 1 w 39
by 1 w 41
the 1 w 44
gods 1 w 48
men 1 w 52
of 2 w 54
the 2 w 57
jury 1 w 61
that 1 w 66
I 3 w 67
brought 1 w 74
this 1 w 78
suit 1 w 82
against 1 w 89
Boeotus 1 w 96
nor 1 w 100
was 2 w 103
I 4 w 104
unaware 1 w 111
that 2 w 115
it 3 w 117
will 1 w 121
seem 1 w 125
strange 1 w 132
to 1 w 134
many 1 w 138
people 1 w 144
that 3 w 148
I 5 w 149
should 1 w 155
bring 1 w 160
suit 2 w 164
because 1 w 171
somebody 1 w 179
thought 1 w 186
right 1 w 191
to 2 w 193
have 1 w 197
the 3 w 200
same 1 w 204
name 1 w 208
as 3 w 210
myself 1 w 216
but 1 w 220
it 5 w 222
was 3 w 225
necessary 1 w 234
to 3 w 236
have 2 w 240
the 4 w 243
matter 1 w 249
decided 1 w 256
in 3 w 258
your 1 w 262
court 1 w 267
in 4 w 270
view 1 w 274
of 3 w 276
the 5 w 279
consequences 1 w 291
that 4 w 295
must 1 w 299
result 1 w 305
if 1 w 307
I 6 w 308
do 1 w 310
not 2 w 313
get 1 w 316
this 2 w 320
matter 2 w 326
righted 1 w 333
If 1 w 336
the 6 w 339
defendant 1 w 348
declared 1 w 356
himself 1 w 363
the 7 w 366
son 1 w 369
of 4 w 371
another 1 w 378
father 1 w 384
and 1 w 387
not 4 w 390
of 5 w 392
my 2 w 394
own 1 w 397
I 8 w 399
should 2 w 405
naturally 1 w 414
have 3 w 418
seemed 1 w 424
meddlesome 1 w 434
in 5 w 436
caring 1 w 442
by 2 w 444
what 1 w 448
name 2 w 452
he 10 w 454
chose 1 w 459
to 4 w 461
call 1 w 465
himself 2 w 472
but 2 w 476
as 5 w 479
it 6 w 481
is 3 w 483
he 11 w 486
brought 2 w 493
suit 3 w 497
against 2 w 504
my 3 w 506
father 2 w 512
and 2 w 516
having 1 w 522
got 1 w 525
up 1 w 527
a 43 w 528
gang 1 w 532
of 6 w 534
blackmailers 1 w 546
This 1 w 550
strong 1 w 556
phrase 1 w 562
occurs 1 w 568
also 1 w 572
in 9 w 574
Dem 1 w 577
40 1 w 580
9 1 w 582
to 5 w 585
support 1 w 592
him 3 w 595
Mnesicles 1 w 605
whom 1 w 610
you 2 w 613
all 3 w 616
probably 1 w 624
know 1 w 628
and 3 w 632
that 5 w 636
Menecles 1 w 644
who 2 w 647
secured 1 w 654
the 11 w 657
conviction 1 w 667
of 7 w 669
Ninus 1 w 674
Ninus 2 w 680
was 4 w 683
a 54 w 684
priestess 1 w 693
who 3 w 696
was 5 w 699
put 1 w 702
to 6 w 704
death 1 w 709
as 9 w 712
the 12 w 715
scholiast 1 w 724
on 7 w 726
Dem 2 w 729
19 1 w 732
281 1 w 736
tells 1 w 741
us 6 w 743
for 1 w 747
supplying 1 w 756
love-potions 1 w 768
to 7 w 770
young 1 w 775
men 2 w 778
The 1 w 782
case 1 w 786
seems 1 w 791
to 8 w 793
have 4 w 797
been 1 w 801
a 61 w 802
notorious 1 w 811
one 1 w 814
and 4 w 818
reflected 1 w 827
little 1 w 833
credit 1 w 839
on 10 w 841
Menecles 2 w 849
and 5 w 853
others 1 w 859
of 8 w 861
the 14 w 864
same 2 w 868
sort 1 w 872
he 18 w 875
went 1 w 879
into 1 w 883
court 2 w 888
alleging 1 w 897
that 6 w 901
he 19 w 903
was 6 w 906
my 4 w 908
father 3 w 914
s 71 w 916
son 2 w 919
by 3 w 921
the 16 w 924
daughter 1 w 932
of 9 w 934
Pamphilus 1 w 943
and 6 w 947
that 7 w 951
he 22 w 953
was 7 w 956
being 1 w 961
outrageously 1 w 973
treated 1 w 980
and 7 w 984
robbed 1 w 990
of 10 w 992
his 4 w 995
civic 1 w 1000
rights 1 w 1006
My 1 w 1009
father 4 w 1015
for 2 w 1019
the 18 w 1022
whole 1 w 1027
truth 1 w 1032
shall 1 w 1037
be 5 w 1039
told 1 w 1043
you 4 w 1046
men 3 w 1050
of 11 w 1052
the 19 w 1055
jury 2 w 1059
feared 1 w 1066
to 12 w 1068
come 1 w 1072
into 2 w 1076
court 3 w 1081
lest 1 w 1085
someone 1 w 1092
on 13 w 1095
the 20 w 1098
ground 1 w 1104
of 12 w 1106
having 2 w 1112
elsewhere 1 w 1121
received 1 w 1129
some 4 w 1133
injury 1 w 1139
from 2 w 1143
him 4 w 1146
in 19 w 1148
his 5 w 1151
public 1 w 1157
life 1 w 1161
should 3 w 1168
confront 1 w 1176
him 5 w 1179
here 2 w 1183
and 8 w 1187
at 19 w 1189
the 21 w 1192
same 3 w 1196
time 1 w 1200
he 30 w 1202
was 8 w 1205
deceived 1 w 1213
by 4 w 1215
this 3 w 1219
man 2 w 1222
s 88 w 1224
mother 1 w 1230
For 1 w 1234
she 1 w 1237
had 1 w 1240
sworn 1 w 1245
that 8 w 1249
if 3 w 1251
he 33 w 1253
should 4 w 1259
tender 1 w 1265
her 10 w 1268
an 16 w 1270
oath 1 w 1274
in 20 w 1276
this 4 w 1280
matter 3 w 1286
she 2 w 1290
would 1 w 1295
refuse 1 w 1301
it 10 w 1303
and 9 w 1307
that 9 w 1311
when 1 w 1316
this 5 w 1320
had 2 w 1323
been 2 w 1327
done 1 w 1331
all 6 w 1335
relations 1 w 1344
between 1 w 1351
them 1 w 1355
would 2 w 1360
be 8 w 1362
at 25 w 1364
an 18 w 1366
end 3 w 1369
and 10 w 1373
she 3 w 1376
had 3 w 1379
also 2 w 1383
had 4 w 1386
money 1 w 1391
deposited 1 w 1400
in 21 w 1402
the 24 w 1405
hands 1 w 1410
of 13 w 1412
a 103 w 1413
third 1 w 1418
party 1 w 1423
on 19 w 1425
her 11 w 1428
behalf 1 w 1434
This 2 w 1438
money 2 w 1443
was 9 w 1446
evidently 1 w 1455
to 14 w 1457
be 10 w 1459
paid 1 w 1463
to 15 w 1465
her 12 w 1468
for 3 w 1471
fulfilling 1 w 1481
her 13 w 1484
promise 1 w 1491
to 16 w 1493
refuse 2 w 1499
the 25 w 1502
oath 2 w 1506
on 21 w 1511
these 1 w 1516
conditions 1 w 1526
then 1 w 1531
my 5 w 1534
father 5 w 1540
tendered 1 w 1548
her 15 w 1551
the 29 w 1554
oath 3 w 1558
But 1 w 1562
she 4 w 1565
accepted 1 w 1573
it 13 w 1575
and 12 w 1579
swore 1 w 1584
that 10 w 1588
not 6 w 1591
only 1 w 1595
the 30 w 1598
defendant 2 w 1607
but 3 w 1611
his 10 w 1614
brother 1 w 1621
too 1 w 1624
her 17 w 1628
other 5 w 1633
son 3 w 1636
was 10 w 1640
my 6 w 1642
father 6 w 1648
s 112 w 1650
child 1 w 1655
When 1 w 1660
she 5 w 1663
had 5 w 1666
done 2 w 1670
this 6 w 1674
it 14 w 1676
was 11 w 1679
necessary 2 w 1688
to 18 w 1690
enter 1 w 1695
them 2 w 1699
among 1 w 1704
the 35 w 1707
clansmen 1 w 1715
Admission 1 w 1725
to 19 w 1727
the 36 w 1730
clan 2 w 1734
was 12 w 1737
necessary 3 w 1746
if 4 w 1749
full 1 w 1753
family 1 w 1759
rights 2 w 1765
were 1 w 1769
to 20 w 1771
be 11 w 1773
secured 2 w 1780
and 13 w 1784
there 1 w 1789
was 13 w 1792
no 9 w 1794
excuse 1 w 1800
left 1 w 1804
My 2 w 1807
father 7 w 1813
did 1 w 1816
enter 2 w 1821
them 3 w 1825
he 63 w 1828
adopted 1 w 1835
them 4 w 1839
as 20 w 1841
his 12 w 1844
children 1 w 1852
and 14 w 1855
to 21 w 1858
cut 1 w 1861
short 1 w 1866
the 41 w 1869
intervening 1 w 1880
matters 1 w 1887
he 66 w 1890
enrolled 1 w 1898
the 42 w 1901
defendant 3 w 1910
at 33 w 1912
the 43 w 1915
Apaturia 1 w 1923
The 2 w 1926
Apaturia 2 w 1934
was 14 w 1937
a 140 w 1938
family 2 w 1944
festival 1 w 1952
occurring 1 w 1961
in 26 w 1963
the 44 w 1966
month 1 w 1971
Pyanepsion 1 w 1981
October-November 1 w 1998
and 15 w 2003
was 15 w 2006
the 45 w 2009
time 2 w 2013
when 2 w 2017
children 2 w 2025
were 2 w 2029
regularly 1 w 2038
registered 1 w 2048
in 27 w 2050
the 46 w 2053
list 1 w 2057
of 14 w 2059
clan-members 1 w 2071
as 23 w 2074
Boeotus 2 w 2081
on 31 w 2083
the 47 w 2086
list 2 w 2090
of 15 w 2092
the 48 w 2095
clansmen 2 w 2103
and 16 w 2107
the 49 w 2110
other 6 w 2115
as 24 w 2117
Pamphilus 2 w 2126
But 2 w 2130
I 9 w 2131
had 6 w 2134
already 1 w 2141
been 3 w 2145
enrolled 2 w 2153
as 25 w 2155
Mantitheus 1 w 2165
My 3 w 2168
father 8 w 2174
s 147 w 2176
death 2 w 2181
happened 1 w 2189
before 1 w 2195
the 53 w 2198
entries 1 w 2205
were 3 w 2209
made 1 w 2213
on 32 w 2215
the 54 w 2218
register 2 w 2226
of 16 w 2228
the 55 w 2231
demesmen 1 w 2239
Enrollment 1 w 2250
on 33 w 2252
the 56 w 2255
register 3 w 2263
of 17 w 2265
the 57 w 2268
deme 2 w 2272
marked 1 w 2278
the 58 w 2281
beginning 1 w 2290
of 18 w 2292
a 163 w 2293
young 2 w 2298
man 3 w 2301
s 152 w 2303
political 1 w 2312
life 2 w 2316
It 2 w 2319
took 1 w 2323
place 1 w 2328
when 3 w 2332
he 87 w 2334
reached 1 w 2341
the 59 w 2344
age 2 w 2347
of 19 w 2349
eighteen 1 w 2357
but 4 w 2361
the 60 w 2364
defendant 4 w 2373
went 2 w 2377
and 17 w 2380
enrolled 3 w 2388
himself 3 w 2395
on 34 w 2397
the 61 w 2400
register 4 w 2408
as 26 w 2410
Mantitheus 2 w 2420
instead 1 w 2428
of 20 w 2430
Boeotus 3 w 2437
How 1 w 2441
great 1 w 2446
a 175 w 2447
wrong 1 w 2452
he 93 w 2454
did 2 w 2457
in 31 w 2459
this 7 w 2463
to 24 w 2466
me 25 w 2468
in 32 w 2471
the 63 w 2474
first 1 w 2479
place 2 w 2484
but 5 w 2488
also 3 w 2492
to 25 w 2494
you 6 w 2497
I 11 w 2499
shall 2 w 2504
show 1 w 2508
as 27 w 2511
soon 1 w 2515
as 28 w 2517
I 12 w 2518
have 5 w 2522
brought 3 w 2529
forward 1 w 2536
witnesses 1 w 2545
to 26 w 2547
prove 1 w 2552
my 7 w 2554
assertions 1 w 2564
The 3 w 2568
Witnesses 1 w 2577