Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / One of the Sons of Aristaechmus Against Nausimachus and Xenopeithes

One of the Sons of Aristaechmus Against Nausimachus and Xenopeithes (11-15)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg038.perseus-eng2:11-15
Refs {'start': {'reference': '11', 'human_reference': 'Section 11'}, 'end': {'reference': '15', 'human_reference': 'Section 15'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

These men are themselves our strongest witnesses; for they will be shown never to have brought suit against Demaretus in his lifetime; but, more than that, anyone who examines and studies the case itself will see, not only that he did not receive the money, but that it was impossible that he should have received it. For the debt was in Bosporus, a place which Demaretus never visited; how, then, could he have collected it? Ah, but, they will say, he sent someone to get the money.

But look at the matter in this way. Hermonax owed these men one hundred staters,[*] which he had received from Nausicrates. Aristaechmus was for sixteen years the guardian and caretaker of these men. Therefore, the money which Hermonax paid in his own person after these men had come of age, he had not paid when they were minors; for he certainly did not pay the same debt twice. Now is there any man so silly as voluntarily to pay money to one not entitled to it, who demanded it by letter, when he had for so long a time evaded payment to the rightful owners? For my part, I think there is not.

However, to prove that I am speaking the truth,—that our father died immediately after the settlement, that these men never brought suit against Demaretus for this money, and that he absolutely never went to sea, nor visited Bosporus, take the depositions.

The Depositions

Well then, that our father did not collect the money after the release; that no one would voluntarily have paid the money, if Demaretus had sent someone to get it; and that he himself neither put out to sea nor visited Bosporus, has been made clear to you from the dates and the depositions. I wish, then, to show you that their whole statement too of the case is absolute falsehood. They have written in the complaint which they are now prosecuting, that we owe the money, inasmuch as our father received it in payment, and passed it over to them as a debt due and payable in his account of his guardianship.

Take, and read me, please, the complaint itself.

The Complaint

You hear it stated in the complaint, inasmuch as Aristaechmus passed the debt over to me in his account of his guardianship. But, when they brought suit against my father in the matter of his guardianship, they wrote the very opposite of this; for they plainly charged him with not rendering an account.

Read, please, the complaint itself, which they then brought against my father.

The Complaint

Tokens

These 1 w 5
men 1 w 8
are 1 w 11
themselves 1 w 21
our 1 w 24
strongest 1 w 33
witnesses 1 w 42
for 1 w 46
they 1 w 50
will 1 w 54
be 1 w 56
shown 1 w 61
never 1 w 66
to 1 w 68
have 1 w 72
brought 1 w 79
suit 1 w 83
against 1 w 90
Demaretus 1 w 99
in 2 w 101
his 1 w 104
lifetime 1 w 112
but 1 w 116
more 1 w 121
than 1 w 125
that 1 w 129
anyone 1 w 136
who 1 w 139
examines 1 w 147
and 1 w 150
studies 1 w 157
the 3 w 160
case 1 w 164
itself 1 w 170
will 2 w 174
see 1 w 177
not 1 w 181
only 1 w 185
that 2 w 189
he 5 w 191
did 1 w 194
not 2 w 197
receive 1 w 204
the 4 w 207
money 1 w 212
but 2 w 216
that 3 w 220
it 4 w 222
was 1 w 225
impossible 1 w 235
that 4 w 239
he 7 w 241
should 1 w 247
have 2 w 251
received 1 w 259
it 5 w 261
For 1 w 265
the 5 w 268
debt 1 w 272
was 2 w 275
in 4 w 277
Bosporus 1 w 285
a 18 w 287
place 1 w 292
which 1 w 297
Demaretus 2 w 306
never 2 w 311
visited 1 w 318
how 2 w 322
then 1 w 327
could 1 w 333
he 10 w 335
have 3 w 339
collected 1 w 348
it 7 w 350
Ah 1 w 353
but 3 w 357
they 2 w 362
will 3 w 366
say 1 w 369
he 12 w 372
sent 1 w 376
someone 1 w 383
to 2 w 385
get 1 w 388
the 8 w 391
money 2 w 396
But 1 w 400
look 1 w 404
at 5 w 406
the 9 w 409
matter 1 w 415
in 5 w 417
this 1 w 421
way 1 w 424
Hermonax 1 w 433
owed 1 w 437
these 1 w 442
men 2 w 445
one 5 w 448
hundred 1 w 455
staters 1 w 462
The 2 w 466
Athenian 1 w 474
stater 2 w 480
was 3 w 483
a 31 w 484
gold 1 w 488
coin 1 w 492
worth 1 w 497
twenty 1 w 503
drachmae 1 w 511
which 2 w 517
he 18 w 519
had 1 w 522
received 2 w 530
from 1 w 534
Nausicrates 1 w 545
Aristaechmus 1 w 558
was 4 w 561
for 2 w 564
sixteen 1 w 571
years 1 w 576
the 12 w 579
guardian 1 w 587
and 2 w 590
caretaker 1 w 599
of 1 w 601
these 2 w 606
men 3 w 609
Therefore 1 w 619
the 14 w 623
money 3 w 628
which 3 w 633
Hermonax 2 w 641
paid 1 w 645
in 7 w 647
his 3 w 650
own 2 w 653
person 1 w 659
after 1 w 664
these 3 w 669
men 4 w 672
had 2 w 675
come 1 w 679
of 2 w 681
age 1 w 684
he 24 w 687
had 3 w 690
not 3 w 693
paid 2 w 697
when 1 w 701
they 3 w 705
were 1 w 709
minors 1 w 715
for 4 w 719
he 27 w 721
certainly 1 w 730
did 2 w 733
not 4 w 736
pay 1 w 739
the 17 w 742
same 1 w 746
debt 2 w 750
twice 1 w 755
Now 1 w 759
is 6 w 761
there 1 w 766
any 2 w 769
man 1 w 772
so 3 w 774
silly 1 w 779
as 6 w 781
voluntarily 1 w 792
to 3 w 794
pay 2 w 797
money 4 w 802
to 4 w 804
one 8 w 807
not 5 w 810
entitled 1 w 818
to 5 w 820
it 9 w 822
who 2 w 826
demanded 1 w 834
it 10 w 836
by 1 w 838
letter 1 w 844
when 2 w 849
he 31 w 851
had 4 w 854
for 5 w 857
so 4 w 859
long 1 w 863
a 62 w 864
time 2 w 868
evaded 1 w 874
payment 1 w 881
to 6 w 883
the 19 w 886
rightful 1 w 894
owners 1 w 900
For 2 w 904
my 1 w 906
part 1 w 910
I 1 w 912
think 1 w 917
there 2 w 922
is 7 w 924
not 6 w 927
However 1 w 935
to 7 w 938
prove 1 w 943
that 5 w 947
I 2 w 948
am 3 w 950
speaking 1 w 958
the 21 w 961
truth 1 w 966
that 6 w 972
our 2 w 975
father 1 w 981
died 1 w 985
immediately 1 w 996
after 2 w 1001
the 23 w 1004
settlement 1 w 1014
that 7 w 1019
these 4 w 1024
men 7 w 1027
never 3 w 1032
brought 2 w 1039
suit 2 w 1043
against 2 w 1050
Demaretus 3 w 1059
for 6 w 1062
this 2 w 1066
money 5 w 1071
and 4 w 1075
that 8 w 1079
he 38 w 1081
absolutely 1 w 1091
never 4 w 1096
went 2 w 1100
to 8 w 1102
sea 1 w 1105
nor 2 w 1109
visited 2 w 1116
Bosporus 2 w 1124
take 2 w 1129
the 25 w 1132
depositions 1 w 1143
The 4 w 1147
Depositions 1 w 1158
Well 1 w 1162
then 3 w 1166
that 9 w 1171
our 3 w 1174
father 2 w 1180
did 3 w 1183
not 7 w 1186
collect 2 w 1193
the 28 w 1196
money 6 w 1201
after 3 w 1206
the 29 w 1209
release 1 w 1216
that 10 w 1221
no 10 w 1223
one 11 w 1226
would 1 w 1231
voluntarily 2 w 1242
have 4 w 1246
paid 3 w 1250
the 30 w 1253
money 7 w 1258
if 2 w 1261
Demaretus 4 w 1270
had 5 w 1273
sent 2 w 1277
someone 2 w 1284
to 9 w 1286
get 2 w 1289
it 15 w 1291
and 5 w 1295
that 11 w 1299
he 46 w 1301
himself 1 w 1308
neither 1 w 1315
put 1 w 1318
out 1 w 1321
to 10 w 1323
sea 2 w 1326
nor 3 w 1329
visited 3 w 1336
Bosporus 3 w 1344
has 1 w 1348
been 1 w 1352
made 1 w 1356
clear 1 w 1361
to 11 w 1363
you 1 w 1366
from 2 w 1370
the 32 w 1373
dates 1 w 1378
and 6 w 1381
the 33 w 1384
depositions 2 w 1395
I 3 w 1397
wish 1 w 1401
then 4 w 1406
to 12 w 1409
show 2 w 1413
you 2 w 1416
that 12 w 1420
their 1 w 1425
whole 1 w 1430
statement 1 w 1439
too 1 w 1442
of 3 w 1444
the 36 w 1447
case 2 w 1451
is 12 w 1453
absolute 2 w 1461
falsehood 1 w 1470
They 1 w 1475
have 5 w 1479
written 1 w 1486
in 13 w 1488
the 37 w 1491
complaint 1 w 1500
which 4 w 1505
they 4 w 1509
are 7 w 1512
now 1 w 1515
prosecuting 1 w 1526
that 13 w 1531
we 6 w 1533
owe 3 w 1536
the 39 w 1539
money 8 w 1544
inasmuch 1 w 1553
as 11 w 1555
our 4 w 1558
father 3 w 1564
received 3 w 1572
it 20 w 1574
in 17 w 1576
payment 2 w 1583
and 7 w 1587
passed 1 w 1593
it 21 w 1595
over 1 w 1599
to 14 w 1601
them 2 w 1605
as 13 w 1607
a 116 w 1608
debt 3 w 1612
due 1 w 1615
and 8 w 1618
payable 1 w 1625
in 18 w 1627
his 5 w 1630
account 1 w 1637
of 4 w 1639
his 6 w 1642
guardianship 1 w 1654
Take 1 w 1659
and 9 w 1663
read 1 w 1667
me 17 w 1669
please 1 w 1676
the 42 w 1680
complaint 2 w 1689
itself 2 w 1695
The 6 w 1699
Complaint 1 w 1708
You 1 w 1711
hear 1 w 1715
it 23 w 1717
stated 1 w 1723
in 21 w 1725
the 43 w 1728
complaint 3 w 1737
inasmuch 2 w 1746
as 16 w 1748
Aristaechmus 2 w 1760
passed 2 w 1766
the 44 w 1769
debt 4 w 1773
over 2 w 1777
to 15 w 1779
me 18 w 1781
in 24 w 1783
his 7 w 1786
account 2 w 1793
of 5 w 1795
his 8 w 1798
guardianship 2 w 1810
But 2 w 1814
when 3 w 1819
they 5 w 1823
brought 3 w 1830
suit 3 w 1834
against 3 w 1841
my 2 w 1843
father 4 w 1849
in 26 w 1851
the 47 w 1854
matter 2 w 1860
of 6 w 1862
his 9 w 1865
guardianship 3 w 1877
they 6 w 1882
wrote 1 w 1887
the 49 w 1890
very 1 w 1894
opposite 1 w 1902
of 7 w 1904
this 3 w 1908
for 7 w 1912
they 7 w 1916
plainly 1 w 1923
charged 1 w 1930
him 2 w 1933
with 1 w 1937
not 8 w 1940
rendering 1 w 1949
an 19 w 1951
account 3 w 1958
Read 1 w 1963
please 2 w 1970
the 51 w 1974
complaint 4 w 1983
itself 3 w 1989
which 5 w 1995
they 8 w 1999
then 5 w 2003
brought 4 w 2010
against 4 w 2017
my 3 w 2019
father 5 w 2025
The 7 w 2029
Complaint 2 w 2038