Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Onetor, An Ejectment Suit I

Against Onetor, An Ejectment Suit I (31-33)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg030.perseus-eng2:31-33
Refs {'start': {'reference': '31', 'human_reference': 'Section 31'}, 'end': {'reference': '33', 'human_reference': 'Section 33'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Although I have so many proofs ready to hand it is Onetor himself who most convincingly showed that the divorce was not a genuine one. He, who should have felt outraged, when, after paying the dowry, as he claims, he got back, not the money, but a farm whose title was under dispute,—this very man, as though he had had no quarrel, and were in no way being wronged, but as though he were on the most intimate terms possible with Aphobus, pleaded for the latter in the suit which I brought against him! As for myself, though I had done him no conceivable injury, he leagued with Aphobus, and sought by every means in his power to join in robbing me of my patrimony, while for Aphobus, whom he should have regarded as a stranger, if there is any truth in their present story, he sought to acquire possession of my property in addition to what he already had.

Nor was it only at the trial that he acted thus, but after judgement had been rendered against Aphobus, he got up before the court and begged the jurymen, beseeching and imploring them on behalf of Aphobus with tears in his eyes, to fix the damages at a talent, and offered himself as surety for this amount. These facts are admitted on all hands. Those who were then serving on the jury in the courtroom and many of the bystanders know them well. Nevertheless I will produce witnesses.

Take, and read this deposition.

The Deposition

Besides all this, men of the jury, there is strong evidence from which it is easy to see that the woman in reality continued to live with Aphobus and even up to the present day has not separated from him. In fact, this woman, before she came to Aphobus, was not unwedded for one single day, but left her living husband, Timocrates, to come and live with Aphobus; and now during the space of three years she has manifestly married no one else. Can anyone believe that she then went directly from husband to husband, in order to avoid living as a widow, but that now, supposing she has really left her husband, she would have endured to remain a widow for so long when she might have married someone else, seeing that her brother possessed so large a fortune, and she herself was so young?

Tokens

Although 1 w 8
I 1 w 9
have 1 w 13
so 1 w 15
many 1 w 19
proofs 1 w 25
ready 1 w 30
to 1 w 32
hand 1 w 36
it 1 w 38
is 1 w 40
Onetor 1 w 46
himself 1 w 53
who 1 w 56
most 1 w 60
convincingly 1 w 72
showed 1 w 78
that 1 w 82
the 1 w 85
divorce 1 w 92
was 1 w 95
not 1 w 98
a 7 w 99
genuine 1 w 106
one 1 w 109
He 1 w 112
who 2 w 116
should 1 w 122
have 2 w 126
felt 1 w 130
outraged 1 w 138
when 1 w 143
after 1 w 149
paying 1 w 155
the 2 w 158
dowry 1 w 163
as 2 w 166
he 4 w 168
claims 1 w 174
he 5 w 177
got 1 w 180
back 1 w 184
not 2 w 188
the 3 w 191
money 1 w 196
but 1 w 200
a 15 w 201
farm 1 w 205
whose 1 w 210
title 1 w 215
was 2 w 218
under 1 w 223
dispute 1 w 230
this 1 w 236
very 1 w 240
man 2 w 243
as 4 w 246
though 2 w 252
he 7 w 254
had 1 w 257
had 2 w 260
no 3 w 262
quarrel 1 w 269
and 2 w 273
were 1 w 277
in 5 w 279
no 4 w 281
way 1 w 284
being 1 w 289
wronged 1 w 296
but 2 w 300
as 5 w 302
though 3 w 308
he 8 w 310
were 2 w 314
on 5 w 316
the 4 w 319
most 2 w 323
intimate 1 w 331
terms 1 w 336
possible 1 w 344
with 1 w 348
Aphobus 1 w 355
pleaded 1 w 363
for 1 w 366
the 5 w 369
latter 1 w 375
in 8 w 377
the 6 w 380
suit 1 w 384
which 1 w 389
I 2 w 390
brought 1 w 397
against 1 w 404
him 2 w 407
As 1 w 410
for 2 w 413
myself 1 w 419
though 4 w 426
I 3 w 427
had 3 w 430
done 1 w 434
him 3 w 437
no 5 w 439
conceivable 1 w 450
injury 1 w 456
he 12 w 459
leagued 1 w 466
with 2 w 470
Aphobus 2 w 477
and 3 w 481
sought 1 w 487
by 1 w 489
every 1 w 494
means 1 w 499
in 11 w 501
his 2 w 504
power 1 w 509
to 3 w 511
join 1 w 515
in 13 w 517
robbing 1 w 524
me 2 w 526
of 2 w 528
my 2 w 530
patrimony 1 w 539
while 1 w 545
for 3 w 548
Aphobus 3 w 555
whom 1 w 560
he 13 w 562
should 2 w 568
have 3 w 572
regarded 1 w 580
as 6 w 582
a 40 w 583
stranger 1 w 591
if 1 w 594
there 1 w 599
is 5 w 601
any 2 w 604
truth 1 w 609
in 15 w 611
their 1 w 616
present 1 w 623
story 1 w 628
he 16 w 631
sought 2 w 637
to 5 w 639
acquire 1 w 646
possession 1 w 656
of 3 w 658
my 3 w 660
property 1 w 668
in 16 w 670
addition 1 w 678
to 6 w 680
what 1 w 684
he 17 w 686
already 1 w 693
had 4 w 696
Nor 1 w 700
was 3 w 703
it 7 w 705
only 1 w 709
at 6 w 711
the 9 w 714
trial 1 w 719
that 2 w 723
he 19 w 725
acted 1 w 730
thus 1 w 734
but 3 w 738
after 2 w 743
judgement 1 w 752
had 5 w 755
been 1 w 759
rendered 1 w 767
against 2 w 774
Aphobus 4 w 781
he 20 w 784
got 2 w 787
up 1 w 789
before 1 w 795
the 10 w 798
court 1 w 803
and 4 w 806
begged 1 w 812
the 11 w 815
jurymen 1 w 822
beseeching 1 w 833
and 5 w 836
imploring 1 w 845
them 1 w 849
on 12 w 851
behalf 1 w 857
of 4 w 859
Aphobus 5 w 866
with 3 w 870
tears 1 w 875
in 20 w 877
his 3 w 880
eyes 1 w 884
to 7 w 887
fix 1 w 890
the 13 w 893
damages 1 w 900
at 8 w 902
a 65 w 903
talent 1 w 909
and 6 w 913
offered 1 w 920
himself 2 w 927
as 8 w 929
surety 1 w 935
for 5 w 938
this 2 w 942
amount 1 w 948
These 1 w 954
facts 1 w 959
are 1 w 962
admitted 1 w 970
on 13 w 972
all 1 w 975
hands 1 w 980
Those 1 w 986
who 5 w 989
were 3 w 993
then 1 w 997
serving 1 w 1004
on 14 w 1006
the 15 w 1009
jury 3 w 1013
in 22 w 1015
the 16 w 1018
courtroom 1 w 1027
and 8 w 1030
many 2 w 1034
of 6 w 1036
the 17 w 1039
bystanders 1 w 1049
know 1 w 1053
them 2 w 1057
well 1 w 1061
Nevertheless 1 w 1074
I 4 w 1075
will 1 w 1079
produce 1 w 1086
witnesses 1 w 1095
Take 1 w 1100
and 10 w 1104
read 3 w 1108
this 3 w 1112
deposition 1 w 1122
The 2 w 1126
Deposition 1 w 1136
Besides 1 w 1143
all 2 w 1146
this 4 w 1150
men 3 w 1154
of 7 w 1156
the 20 w 1159
jury 4 w 1163
there 2 w 1169
is 10 w 1171
strong 1 w 1177
evidence 1 w 1185
from 1 w 1189
which 2 w 1194
it 13 w 1196
is 11 w 1198
easy 1 w 1202
to 8 w 1204
see 2 w 1207
that 3 w 1211
the 22 w 1214
woman 1 w 1219
in 23 w 1221
reality 1 w 1228
continued 1 w 1237
to 9 w 1239
live 1 w 1243
with 4 w 1247
Aphobus 6 w 1254
and 11 w 1257
even 1 w 1261
up 2 w 1263
to 10 w 1265
the 23 w 1268
present 2 w 1275
day 1 w 1278
has 1 w 1281
not 3 w 1284
separated 1 w 1293
from 2 w 1297
him 5 w 1300
In 1 w 1303
fact 2 w 1307
this 5 w 1312
woman 2 w 1317
before 2 w 1324
she 1 w 1327
came 1 w 1331
to 11 w 1333
Aphobus 7 w 1340
was 4 w 1344
not 4 w 1347
unwedded 1 w 1355
for 7 w 1358
one 4 w 1361
single 1 w 1367
day 2 w 1370
but 4 w 1374
left 1 w 1378
her 3 w 1381
living 1 w 1387
husband 1 w 1394
Timocrates 1 w 1405
to 12 w 1408
come 1 w 1412
and 13 w 1415
live 2 w 1419
with 5 w 1423
Aphobus 8 w 1430
and 14 w 1434
now 2 w 1437
during 1 w 1443
the 24 w 1446
space 1 w 1451
of 8 w 1453
three 1 w 1458
years 1 w 1463
she 2 w 1466
has 2 w 1469
manifestly 1 w 1479
married 1 w 1486
no 10 w 1488
one 5 w 1491
else 1 w 1495
Can 1 w 1499
anyone 1 w 1505
believe 1 w 1512
that 4 w 1516
she 3 w 1519
then 2 w 1523
went 1 w 1527
directly 1 w 1535
from 3 w 1539
husband 2 w 1546
to 13 w 1548
husband 3 w 1555
in 28 w 1558
order 1 w 1563
to 14 w 1565
avoid 1 w 1570
living 2 w 1576
as 13 w 1578
a 112 w 1579
widow 1 w 1584
but 5 w 1588
that 5 w 1592
now 3 w 1595
supposing 1 w 1605
she 4 w 1608
has 3 w 1611
really 1 w 1617
left 2 w 1621
her 4 w 1624
husband 4 w 1631
she 5 w 1635
would 1 w 1640
have 4 w 1644
endured 1 w 1651
to 15 w 1653
remain 1 w 1659
a 119 w 1660
widow 2 w 1665
for 8 w 1668
so 4 w 1670
long 1 w 1674
when 2 w 1678
she 6 w 1681
might 1 w 1686
have 5 w 1690
married 2 w 1697
someone 1 w 1704
else 2 w 1708
seeing 1 w 1715
that 6 w 1719
her 5 w 1722
brother 1 w 1729
possessed 1 w 1738
so 6 w 1740
large 1 w 1745
a 124 w 1746
fortune 1 w 1753
and 18 w 1757
she 7 w 1760
herself 1 w 1767
was 5 w 1770
so 7 w 1772
young 1 w 1777