Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Onetor, An Ejectment Suit I

Against Onetor, An Ejectment Suit I (16-19)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg030.perseus-eng2:16-19
Refs {'start': {'reference': '16', 'human_reference': 'Section 16'}, 'end': {'reference': '19', 'human_reference': 'Section 19'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

The shortness of the time makes the continuance of the debt in accordance with the agreement not unlikely, but it is incredible that it should have been paid. For do you suppose that the defendant here, a man who at the first chose to owe the money and to pay interest on it, in order that his sisters dowry might not be jeopardized along with the rest of her husbands property, would have paid it when suit had already been instituted against that husband? Why, even if he had at the first trusted him with the money, he would then at once have sought to recover it. No, men of the jury; the supposition is, I presume, impossible.

To prove that the woman married at the time I mention; that in the interim Aphobus and I had already gone to law; and that those men did not register the divorce with the archon until after I had instituted my suit, take, please, these depositions regarding each point.

The Depositions

After this archon came Cephisodorus and then Chion. During their term of office, having been admitted to citizenship, I continued to press my charges, and in the archonship of Timocrates I began my suit.

Take this deposition, please.

The Deposition

Read also this deposition.

The Deposition

It is clear, then, from the evidence adduced that it is not because they have paid the dowry, but because they wish to save his property for Aphobus, that they have had the audacity to act as they have done. For when in so short a time they allege that they owed the money; that they paid it; that the woman was divorced and could not recover the dowry; and that they took a mortgage on the land; how can it be other than clear that they are acting in collusion in their attempt to defraud me of the damages awarded me by you?

I shall now endeavor to prove to you from the answers given by the defendant himself, and by Timocrates, and Aphobus, that it is impossible that the dowry should have been paid. For, men of the jury, I questioned each of these men in the presence of many witnesses. I asked Onetor and Timocrates whether any witnesses were present when they paid the dowry, and Aphobus himself whether any were present when he received it;

Tokens

The 1 w 3
shortness 1 w 12
of 1 w 14
the 1 w 17
time 1 w 21
makes 1 w 26
the 2 w 29
continuance 1 w 40
of 2 w 42
the 3 w 45
debt 1 w 49
in 2 w 51
accordance 1 w 61
with 1 w 65
the 4 w 68
agreement 1 w 77
not 1 w 80
unlikely 1 w 88
but 1 w 92
it 2 w 94
is 1 w 96
incredible 1 w 106
that 1 w 110
it 3 w 112
should 1 w 118
have 1 w 122
been 1 w 126
paid 1 w 130
For 1 w 134
do 1 w 136
you 1 w 139
suppose 1 w 146
that 2 w 150
the 5 w 153
defendant 1 w 162
here 1 w 166
a 11 w 168
man 1 w 171
who 1 w 174
at 3 w 176
the 6 w 179
first 1 w 184
chose 1 w 189
to 1 w 191
owe 1 w 194
the 7 w 197
money 1 w 202
and 1 w 205
to 2 w 207
pay 1 w 210
interest 1 w 218
on 3 w 220
it 4 w 222
in 5 w 225
order 1 w 230
that 3 w 234
his 1 w 237
sister 1 w 243
s 15 w 245
dowry 1 w 250
might 1 w 255
not 2 w 258
be 2 w 260
jeopardized 1 w 271
along 1 w 276
with 2 w 280
the 8 w 283
rest 2 w 287
of 3 w 289
her 2 w 292
husband 1 w 299
s 18 w 301
property 1 w 309
would 1 w 315
have 2 w 319
paid 2 w 323
it 6 w 325
when 1 w 329
suit 1 w 333
had 1 w 336
already 1 w 343
been 2 w 347
instituted 1 w 357
against 1 w 364
that 4 w 368
husband 2 w 375
Why 1 w 379
even 1 w 384
if 1 w 386
he 13 w 388
had 2 w 391
at 6 w 393
the 9 w 396
first 2 w 401
trusted 1 w 408
him 1 w 411
with 3 w 415
the 10 w 418
money 2 w 423
he 16 w 426
would 2 w 431
then 1 w 435
at 7 w 437
once 1 w 441
have 3 w 445
sought 1 w 451
to 3 w 453
recover 1 w 460
it 10 w 462
No 1 w 465
men 2 w 469
of 4 w 471
the 12 w 474
jury 1 w 478
the 13 w 482
supposition 1 w 493
is 4 w 495
I 1 w 497
presume 1 w 504
impossible 1 w 515
To 1 w 518
prove 1 w 523
that 5 w 527
the 14 w 530
woman 1 w 535
married 1 w 542
at 9 w 544
the 15 w 547
time 2 w 551
I 2 w 552
mention 1 w 559
that 6 w 564
in 8 w 566
the 16 w 569
interim 1 w 576
Aphobus 1 w 583
and 4 w 586
I 3 w 587
had 3 w 590
already 2 w 597
gone 1 w 601
to 4 w 603
law 1 w 606
and 5 w 610
that 7 w 614
those 1 w 619
men 4 w 622
did 1 w 625
not 3 w 628
register 1 w 636
the 17 w 639
divorce 1 w 646
with 4 w 650
the 18 w 653
archon 1 w 659
until 1 w 664
after 1 w 669
I 4 w 670
had 4 w 673
instituted 2 w 683
my 1 w 685
suit 2 w 689
take 1 w 694
please 1 w 701
these 1 w 707
depositions 1 w 718
regarding 1 w 727
each 1 w 731
point 1 w 736
The 2 w 740
Depositions 1 w 751
After 1 w 756
this 1 w 760
archon 2 w 766
came 1 w 770
Cephisodorus 1 w 782
and 6 w 785
then 2 w 789
Chion 1 w 794
During 1 w 801
their 1 w 806
term 1 w 810
of 5 w 812
office 1 w 818
having 1 w 825
been 3 w 829
admitted 1 w 837
to 5 w 839
citizenship 1 w 850
I 5 w 852
continued 1 w 861
to 6 w 863
press 1 w 868
my 2 w 870
charges 1 w 877
and 7 w 881
in 16 w 883
the 22 w 886
archonship 1 w 896
of 7 w 898
Timocrates 1 w 908
I 6 w 909
began 1 w 914
my 3 w 916
suit 3 w 920
Take 1 w 925
this 2 w 929
deposition 2 w 939
please 2 w 946
The 3 w 950
Deposition 2 w 960
Read 1 w 964
also 1 w 968
this 3 w 972
deposition 3 w 982
The 4 w 986
Deposition 3 w 996
It 1 w 998
is 10 w 1000
clear 1 w 1005
then 3 w 1010
from 1 w 1015
the 24 w 1018
evidence 1 w 1026
adduced 1 w 1033
that 8 w 1037
it 24 w 1039
is 11 w 1041
not 4 w 1044
because 1 w 1051
they 1 w 1055
have 4 w 1059
paid 3 w 1063
the 26 w 1066
dowry 2 w 1071
but 2 w 1075
because 2 w 1082
they 2 w 1086
wish 1 w 1090
to 7 w 1092
save 1 w 1096
his 6 w 1099
property 2 w 1107
for 1 w 1110
Aphobus 2 w 1117
that 9 w 1122
they 3 w 1126
have 5 w 1130
had 5 w 1133
the 29 w 1136
audacity 1 w 1144
to 8 w 1146
act 1 w 1149
as 3 w 1151
they 4 w 1155
have 6 w 1159
done 1 w 1163
For 2 w 1167
when 2 w 1171
in 17 w 1173
so 4 w 1175
short 2 w 1180
a 82 w 1181
time 3 w 1185
they 5 w 1189
allege 1 w 1195
that 10 w 1199
they 6 w 1203
owed 1 w 1207
the 33 w 1210
money 3 w 1215
that 11 w 1220
they 7 w 1224
paid 4 w 1228
it 26 w 1230
that 12 w 1235
the 35 w 1238
woman 2 w 1243
was 1 w 1246
divorced 1 w 1254
and 8 w 1257
could 1 w 1262
not 5 w 1265
recover 2 w 1272
the 36 w 1275
dowry 3 w 1280
and 9 w 1284
that 13 w 1288
they 8 w 1292
took 1 w 1296
a 93 w 1297
mortgage 1 w 1305
on 23 w 1307
the 38 w 1310
land 1 w 1314
how 1 w 1318
can 1 w 1321
it 27 w 1323
be 8 w 1325
other 1 w 1330
than 1 w 1334
clear 2 w 1339
that 14 w 1343
they 9 w 1347
are 1 w 1350
acting 1 w 1356
in 19 w 1358
collusion 1 w 1367
in 20 w 1369
their 2 w 1374
attempt 1 w 1381
to 10 w 1383
defraud 1 w 1390
me 10 w 1392
of 8 w 1394
the 42 w 1397
damages 1 w 1404
awarded 1 w 1411
me 11 w 1413
by 1 w 1415
you 2 w 1418
I 8 w 1420
shall 1 w 1425
now 1 w 1428
endeavor 1 w 1436
to 11 w 1438
prove 2 w 1443
to 12 w 1445
you 3 w 1448
from 2 w 1452
the 43 w 1455
answers 1 w 1462
given 1 w 1467
by 2 w 1469
the 44 w 1472
defendant 2 w 1481
himself 1 w 1488
and 11 w 1492
by 3 w 1494
Timocrates 2 w 1504
and 12 w 1508
Aphobus 3 w 1515
that 15 w 1520
it 28 w 1522
is 14 w 1524
impossible 2 w 1534
that 16 w 1538
the 45 w 1541
dowry 4 w 1546
should 2 w 1552
have 7 w 1556
been 4 w 1560
paid 5 w 1564
For 3 w 1568
men 5 w 1572
of 9 w 1574
the 46 w 1577
jury 2 w 1581
I 9 w 1583
questioned 1 w 1593
each 2 w 1597
of 10 w 1599
these 2 w 1604
men 6 w 1607
in 21 w 1609
the 48 w 1612
presence 1 w 1620
of 11 w 1622
many 1 w 1626
witnesses 1 w 1635
I 10 w 1637
asked 1 w 1642
Onetor 1 w 1648
and 13 w 1651
Timocrates 3 w 1661
whether 1 w 1668
any 2 w 1671
witnesses 2 w 1680
were 1 w 1684
present 1 w 1691
when 3 w 1695
they 10 w 1699
paid 6 w 1703
the 51 w 1706
dowry 5 w 1711
and 14 w 1715
Aphobus 4 w 1722
himself 2 w 1729
whether 2 w 1736
any 3 w 1739
were 2 w 1743
present 2 w 1750
when 4 w 1754
he 67 w 1756
received 1 w 1764
it 31 w 1766