Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Aphobus III

Against Aphobus III (51-55)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg029.perseus-eng2:51-55
Refs {'start': {'reference': '51', 'human_reference': 'Section 51'}, 'end': {'reference': '55', 'human_reference': 'Section 55'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

For I, in my desire to refute him in every particular, and in my attempt to make clear to you his tricks and his villainies, asked him how large the sum was regarding which he demanded to examine Milyas, as one who had knowledge of the facts. To this he replied falsely, that it was in regard to the whole amount. Well then, said I, as to this I will give up to you for examination by torture the slave who has the copy of your challenge to me.

If, when I have given oath that you acknowledged the man to be free, and that you so testified against Demo, you will swear to the contrary with imprecations upon your daughter, I release to you the entire sum, for which you shall be shown by the examination of the slave to have at the first demanded Milyas; and the damages which you were condemned to pay shall be lessened by thus muchthat is, by the amount in regard to which you demanded Milyas, to the end that you may be found to have been put to no disadvantage by the witnesses.

This challenge I made to him in the presence of many witnesses; but he said he could not accept it. Yet, if a man refused to give this judgement in his own favor, how can it be right for you, who are upon your oaths, to give credence to his words and convict the witnesses, and not rather to regard this man as the most shameless of humankind?

To prove that my words are true, call the witnesses to these facts.

The Witnesses

Do not suppose that while I was ready to take this course, the witnesses did not hold the same opinion. No; they too were ready to place their children by their side, and in confirmation of the testimony they had given, to take an oath with imprecations upon them, if they swore falsely. But Aphobus did not see fit to allow an oath to be given either to them or to me. Instead, he rests his case on arguments subtly planned and on witnesses accustomed to perjury, and thinks thereby easily to mislead you.

So take and read to the jury this deposition also.

The Deposition

How could one prove more clearly than I have proved that we are the object of a malicious charge; that the evidence brought forward against my opponent is true; and that his condemnation was just? I have shown that he refused to examine by torture the slave who wrote the testimony regarding the very things to which he had testified; that his brother, Aesius, has attested the facts which he on his part declares to be false;

Tokens

For 1 w 3
I 1 w 4
in 1 w 7
my 1 w 9
desire 1 w 15
to 1 w 17
refute 1 w 23
him 1 w 26
in 2 w 28
every 1 w 33
particular 1 w 43
and 1 w 47
in 3 w 49
my 2 w 51
attempt 1 w 58
to 2 w 60
make 1 w 64
clear 1 w 69
to 3 w 71
you 1 w 74
his 1 w 77
tricks 1 w 83
and 2 w 86
his 2 w 89
villainies 1 w 99
asked 1 w 105
him 2 w 108
how 1 w 111
large 1 w 116
the 1 w 119
sum 1 w 122
was 1 w 125
regarding 1 w 134
which 1 w 139
he 2 w 141
demanded 1 w 149
to 4 w 151
examine 1 w 158
Milyas 1 w 164
as 4 w 167
one 1 w 170
who 1 w 173
had 1 w 176
knowledge 1 w 185
of 1 w 187
the 2 w 190
facts 1 w 195
To 1 w 198
this 1 w 202
he 4 w 204
replied 1 w 211
falsely 1 w 218
that 1 w 223
it 1 w 225
was 2 w 228
in 7 w 230
regard 2 w 236
to 5 w 238
the 3 w 241
whole 1 w 246
amount 1 w 252
Well 1 w 257
then 1 w 261
said 1 w 266
I 2 w 267
as 6 w 270
to 6 w 272
this 2 w 276
I 3 w 277
will 1 w 281
give 1 w 285
up 1 w 287
to 7 w 289
you 2 w 292
for 1 w 295
examination 1 w 306
by 1 w 308
torture 1 w 315
the 5 w 318
slave 1 w 323
who 3 w 326
has 1 w 329
the 6 w 332
copy 1 w 336
of 2 w 338
your 1 w 342
challenge 1 w 351
to 9 w 353
me 1 w 355
If 1 w 358
when 1 w 363
I 5 w 364
have 1 w 368
given 1 w 373
oath 1 w 377
that 2 w 381
you 4 w 384
acknowledged 1 w 396
the 7 w 399
man 2 w 402
to 10 w 404
be 1 w 406
free 1 w 410
and 4 w 414
that 3 w 418
you 5 w 421
so 1 w 423
testified 1 w 432
against 1 w 439
Demo 1 w 443
you 6 w 447
will 2 w 451
swear 1 w 456
to 11 w 458
the 8 w 461
contrary 1 w 469
with 1 w 473
imprecations 1 w 485
upon 1 w 489
your 2 w 493
daughter 1 w 501
I 6 w 503
release 1 w 510
to 12 w 512
you 8 w 515
the 9 w 518
entire 1 w 524
sum 2 w 527
for 2 w 531
which 2 w 536
you 9 w 539
shall 1 w 544
be 2 w 546
shown 1 w 551
by 2 w 553
the 10 w 556
examination 2 w 567
of 3 w 569
the 11 w 572
slave 2 w 577
to 13 w 579
have 2 w 583
at 9 w 585
the 12 w 588
first 1 w 593
demanded 2 w 601
Milyas 2 w 607
and 6 w 611
the 13 w 614
damages 1 w 621
which 3 w 626
you 10 w 629
were 1 w 633
condemned 1 w 642
to 14 w 644
pay 1 w 647
shall 2 w 652
be 3 w 654
lessened 1 w 662
by 3 w 664
thus 1 w 668
much 1 w 672
that 4 w 677
is 5 w 679
by 4 w 682
the 14 w 685
amount 2 w 691
in 11 w 693
regard 3 w 699
to 15 w 701
which 4 w 706
you 11 w 709
demanded 3 w 717
Milyas 3 w 723
to 16 w 726
the 15 w 729
end 1 w 732
that 5 w 736
you 12 w 739
may 1 w 742
be 4 w 744
found 1 w 749
to 17 w 751
have 3 w 755
been 1 w 759
put 1 w 762
to 18 w 764
no 3 w 766
disadvantage 1 w 778
by 5 w 780
the 16 w 783
witnesses 1 w 792
This 1 w 797
challenge 2 w 806
I 7 w 807
made 1 w 811
to 19 w 813
him 3 w 816
in 12 w 818
the 17 w 821
presence 1 w 829
of 4 w 831
many 1 w 835
witnesses 2 w 844
but 1 w 848
he 21 w 850
said 2 w 854
he 22 w 856
could 1 w 861
not 1 w 864
accept 1 w 870
it 5 w 872
Yet 1 w 876
if 2 w 879
a 74 w 880
man 6 w 883
refused 1 w 890
to 20 w 892
give 3 w 896
this 3 w 900
judgement 1 w 909
in 13 w 911
his 7 w 914
own 2 w 917
favor 1 w 922
how 3 w 926
can 1 w 929
it 6 w 931
be 6 w 933
right 1 w 938
for 3 w 941
you 13 w 944
who 4 w 948
are 1 w 951
upon 2 w 955
your 3 w 959
oaths 1 w 964
to 21 w 967
give 4 w 971
credence 1 w 979
to 22 w 981
his 8 w 984
words 1 w 989
and 8 w 992
convict 1 w 999
the 18 w 1002
witnesses 3 w 1011
and 9 w 1015
not 2 w 1018
rather 1 w 1024
to 23 w 1026
regard 4 w 1032
this 4 w 1036
man 7 w 1039
as 11 w 1041
the 20 w 1044
most 1 w 1048
shameless 1 w 1057
of 5 w 1059
humankind 1 w 1068
To 2 w 1071
prove 1 w 1076
that 6 w 1080
my 3 w 1082
words 2 w 1087
are 2 w 1090
true 1 w 1094
call 1 w 1099
the 21 w 1102
witnesses 4 w 1111
to 24 w 1113
these 1 w 1118
facts 2 w 1123
The 1 w 1127
Witnesses 1 w 1136
Do 1 w 1138
not 3 w 1141
suppose 1 w 1148
that 7 w 1152
while 1 w 1157
I 8 w 1158
was 3 w 1161
ready 1 w 1166
to 25 w 1168
take 1 w 1172
this 5 w 1176
course 1 w 1182
the 23 w 1186
witnesses 5 w 1195
did 1 w 1198
not 4 w 1201
hold 1 w 1205
the 24 w 1208
same 1 w 1212
opinion 1 w 1219
No 1 w 1222
they 1 w 1227
too 1 w 1230
were 2 w 1234
ready 2 w 1239
to 27 w 1241
place 1 w 1246
their 1 w 1251
children 1 w 1259
by 6 w 1261
their 2 w 1266
side 1 w 1270
and 10 w 1274
in 16 w 1276
confirmation 1 w 1288
of 6 w 1290
the 28 w 1293
testimony 1 w 1302
they 2 w 1306
had 2 w 1309
given 2 w 1314
to 28 w 1317
take 2 w 1321
an 18 w 1323
oath 3 w 1327
with 2 w 1331
imprecations 2 w 1343
upon 3 w 1347
them 1 w 1351
if 3 w 1354
they 3 w 1358
swore 1 w 1363
falsely 2 w 1370
But 1 w 1374
Aphobus 1 w 1381
did 2 w 1384
not 5 w 1387
see 1 w 1390
fit 1 w 1393
to 29 w 1395
allow 1 w 1400
an 19 w 1402
oath 4 w 1406
to 30 w 1408
be 7 w 1410
given 3 w 1415
either 1 w 1421
to 31 w 1423
them 2 w 1427
or 10 w 1429
to 32 w 1431
me 5 w 1433
Instead 1 w 1441
he 40 w 1444
rests 1 w 1449
his 11 w 1452
case 1 w 1456
on 16 w 1458
arguments 1 w 1467
subtly 1 w 1473
planned 1 w 1480
and 11 w 1483
on 17 w 1485
witnesses 6 w 1494
accustomed 1 w 1504
to 34 w 1506
perjury 1 w 1513
and 12 w 1517
thinks 1 w 1523
thereby 1 w 1530
easily 1 w 1536
to 35 w 1538
mislead 1 w 1545
you 15 w 1548
So 1 w 1551
take 3 w 1555
and 13 w 1558
read 3 w 1562
to 36 w 1564
the 35 w 1567
jury 2 w 1571
this 6 w 1575
deposition 1 w 1585
also 1 w 1589
The 2 w 1593
Deposition 1 w 1603
How 1 w 1606
could 2 w 1611
one 2 w 1614
prove 2 w 1619
more 1 w 1623
clearly 1 w 1630
than 1 w 1634
I 10 w 1635
have 4 w 1639
proved 1 w 1645
that 8 w 1649
we 4 w 1651
are 3 w 1654
the 36 w 1657
object 1 w 1663
of 7 w 1665
a 128 w 1666
malicious 1 w 1675
charge 1 w 1681
that 9 w 1686
the 37 w 1689
evidence 1 w 1697
brought 1 w 1704
forward 1 w 1711
against 2 w 1718
my 4 w 1720
opponent 1 w 1728
is 16 w 1730
true 2 w 1734
and 14 w 1738
that 10 w 1742
his 13 w 1745
condemnation 1 w 1757
was 4 w 1760
just 1 w 1764
I 11 w 1766
have 5 w 1770
shown 2 w 1775
that 11 w 1779
he 46 w 1781
refused 2 w 1788
to 37 w 1790
examine 2 w 1797
by 8 w 1799
torture 2 w 1806
the 38 w 1809
slave 3 w 1814
who 5 w 1817
wrote 1 w 1822
the 39 w 1825
testimony 2 w 1834
regarding 2 w 1843
the 40 w 1846
very 2 w 1850
things 1 w 1856
to 39 w 1858
which 5 w 1863
he 50 w 1865
had 3 w 1868
testified 2 w 1877
that 12 w 1882
his 14 w 1885
brother 1 w 1892
Aesius 1 w 1899
has 2 w 1903
attested 1 w 1911
the 42 w 1914
facts 3 w 1919
which 6 w 1924
he 53 w 1926
on 25 w 1928
his 15 w 1931
part 2 w 1935
declares 1 w 1943
to 40 w 1945
be 8 w 1947
false 3 w 1952