Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Aphobus III

Against Aphobus III (46-50)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg029.perseus-eng2:46-50
Refs {'start': {'reference': '46', 'human_reference': 'Section 46'}, 'end': {'reference': '50', 'human_reference': 'Section 50'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

As to his story of money left in the house I shall clearly prove to you that he is lying. This argument he speciously introduced, when it had become clear that the property was large and was unable to show that he had paid it back, in order that it might appear a reasonable inference that I was wrongfully seeking to recover what was already in my possession.

[*] If my father had no confidence in these men it is plain that he would neither have entrusted them with the rest of his property, nor, if he had left this money in the way alleged, would he have told them of it. How, then, do they know about it? But, if he had confidence in them, he would not, I take it, have given into their hands the bulk of his property, and not have put them in charge of the rest. Nor would he have entrusted this remainder to my mother to keep and then have pledged her herself in marriage to this man, who was one of the guardians. For it is not reasonable that he should seek to make the money secure through her, and yet put one of the men whom he distrusted in control both of her and of it.

Furthermore, if there were any truth in all this, do you suppose that Aphobus would not have taken my mother to wife, bequeathed to him as she was by my father? He had already taken her marriage-portionthe eighty minaeas though he were going to marry her; but he subsequently married the daughter of Philonides of Melite, from motives of avarice, in order that, in addition to what he had received from us, he might get from him other eighty minae. But, if there had been four talents in the house, and in her custody, as he alleges, dont you imagine he would have raced to get possession both of her and of them?

Would he have joined with his co-trustees in so shamefully plundering my visible property, which many of you knew had been left me, and have refrained, when he had the chance, from seizing a fund to the existence of which you would not be able to testify? Who can believe this? It is impossible, men of the jury; it is impossible. No; all the money which my father left was indeed buried on the day on which it came into the hands of these men; and the defendant, not being able to tell when and where he paid back any of it, makes use of these arguments, hoping that I may seem to be a rich man, and so meet with no compassion from you.

I have many other charges to make against him, but I have not the right to speak of the injuries I myself have suffered, when the witness is in danger of losing his civic rights. Still I wish to read to you a challenge, for you will know, when you have heard it, that the testimony was true, and that Aphobus, who now declares that he demands Milyas to be examined about all the matters involved in the suit, at first demanded him only in regard to a question of thirty minae; and, furthermore, that he has been put to no disadvantage because of the testimony.

Tokens

As 1 w 2
to 1 w 4
his 1 w 7
story 1 w 12
of 1 w 14
money 1 w 19
left 1 w 23
in 1 w 25
the 1 w 28
house 1 w 33
I 1 w 34
shall 1 w 39
clearly 1 w 46
prove 1 w 51
to 3 w 53
you 1 w 56
that 1 w 60
he 2 w 62
is 2 w 64
lying 1 w 69
This 1 w 74
argument 1 w 82
he 3 w 84
speciously 1 w 94
introduced 1 w 104
when 1 w 109
it 1 w 111
had 1 w 114
become 1 w 120
clear 2 w 125
that 2 w 129
the 2 w 132
property 1 w 140
was 1 w 143
large 1 w 148
and 1 w 151
was 2 w 154
unable 1 w 160
to 4 w 162
show 1 w 166
that 3 w 170
he 6 w 172
had 2 w 175
paid 1 w 179
it 2 w 181
back 1 w 185
in 4 w 188
order 1 w 193
that 4 w 197
it 3 w 199
might 1 w 204
appear 1 w 210
a 20 w 211
reasonable 1 w 221
inference 1 w 230
that 5 w 234
I 2 w 235
was 3 w 238
wrongfully 1 w 248
seeking 1 w 255
to 5 w 257
recover 1 w 264
what 1 w 268
was 4 w 271
already 1 w 278
in 7 w 280
my 1 w 282
possession 1 w 292
This 2 w 297
passage 1 w 304
repeats 1 w 311
very 1 w 315
closely 1 w 322
the 3 w 325
language 1 w 333
of 2 w 335
Dem 1 w 338
27 1 w 341
55-57 1 w 347
If 1 w 349
my 2 w 351
father 1 w 357
had 3 w 360
no 1 w 362
confidence 1 w 372
in 8 w 374
these 1 w 379
men 2 w 382
it 4 w 384
is 5 w 386
plain 1 w 391
that 6 w 395
he 10 w 397
would 1 w 402
neither 1 w 409
have 1 w 413
entrusted 1 w 422
them 1 w 426
with 1 w 430
the 8 w 433
rest 1 w 437
of 3 w 439
his 4 w 442
property 2 w 450
nor 1 w 454
if 1 w 457
he 14 w 459
had 4 w 462
left 2 w 466
this 1 w 470
money 2 w 475
in 10 w 477
the 9 w 480
way 1 w 483
alleged 1 w 490
would 2 w 496
he 16 w 498
have 2 w 502
told 1 w 506
them 2 w 510
of 4 w 512
it 7 w 514
How 1 w 518
then 1 w 523
do 1 w 526
they 1 w 530
know 1 w 534
about 1 w 539
it 8 w 541
But 1 w 545
if 2 w 548
he 20 w 550
had 5 w 553
confidence 2 w 563
in 11 w 565
them 3 w 569
he 22 w 572
would 3 w 577
not 1 w 580
I 4 w 582
take 1 w 586
it 9 w 588
have 3 w 593
given 1 w 598
into 1 w 602
their 1 w 607
hands 1 w 612
the 15 w 615
bulk 1 w 619
of 5 w 621
his 6 w 624
property 3 w 632
and 3 w 636
not 2 w 639
have 4 w 643
put 1 w 646
them 4 w 650
in 13 w 652
charge 1 w 658
of 6 w 660
the 17 w 663
rest 2 w 667
Nor 1 w 671
would 4 w 676
he 27 w 678
have 5 w 682
entrusted 2 w 691
this 2 w 695
remainder 1 w 704
to 8 w 706
my 3 w 708
mother 1 w 714
to 9 w 716
keep 1 w 720
and 4 w 723
then 2 w 727
have 6 w 731
pledged 1 w 738
her 4 w 741
herself 1 w 748
in 15 w 750
marriage 1 w 758
to 10 w 760
this 3 w 764
man 1 w 767
who 1 w 771
was 5 w 774
one 3 w 777
of 7 w 779
the 20 w 782
guardians 1 w 791
For 1 w 795
it 10 w 797
is 11 w 799
not 3 w 802
reasonable 2 w 812
that 7 w 816
he 33 w 818
should 1 w 824
seek 2 w 828
to 11 w 830
make 1 w 834
the 21 w 837
money 3 w 842
secure 1 w 848
through 1 w 855
her 6 w 858
and 5 w 862
yet 1 w 865
put 2 w 868
one 5 w 871
of 8 w 873
the 22 w 876
men 3 w 879
whom 1 w 883
he 37 w 885
distrusted 1 w 895
in 16 w 897
control 1 w 904
both 1 w 908
of 9 w 910
her 7 w 913
and 6 w 916
of 10 w 918
it 11 w 920
Furthermore 1 w 932
if 3 w 935
there 1 w 940
were 1 w 944
any 1 w 947
truth 1 w 952
in 17 w 954
all 3 w 957
this 4 w 961
do 2 w 964
you 2 w 967
suppose 1 w 974
that 8 w 978
Aphobus 1 w 985
would 5 w 990
not 4 w 993
have 7 w 997
taken 1 w 1002
my 4 w 1004
mother 2 w 1010
to 12 w 1012
wife 1 w 1016
bequeathed 1 w 1027
to 13 w 1029
him 1 w 1032
as 9 w 1034
she 1 w 1037
was 6 w 1040
by 1 w 1042
my 5 w 1044
father 2 w 1050
He 1 w 1053
had 6 w 1056
already 2 w 1063
taken 2 w 1068
her 12 w 1071
marriage-portion 1 w 1087
the 28 w 1091
eighty 1 w 1097
minae 1 w 1102
as 11 w 1105
though 1 w 1111
he 47 w 1113
were 2 w 1117
going 1 w 1122
to 14 w 1124
marry 1 w 1129
her 13 w 1132
but 1 w 1136
he 49 w 1138
subsequently 1 w 1150
married 1 w 1157
the 29 w 1160
daughter 1 w 1168
of 11 w 1170
Philonides 1 w 1180
of 12 w 1182
Melite 1 w 1188
from 1 w 1193
motives 1 w 1200
of 13 w 1202
avarice 1 w 1209
in 20 w 1212
order 2 w 1217
that 9 w 1221
in 21 w 1224
addition 1 w 1232
to 15 w 1234
what 2 w 1238
he 51 w 1240
had 7 w 1243
received 1 w 1251
from 2 w 1255
us 7 w 1257
he 52 w 1260
might 2 w 1265
get 1 w 1268
from 3 w 1272
him 2 w 1275
other 3 w 1280
eighty 2 w 1286
minae 2 w 1291
But 2 w 1295
if 5 w 1298
there 2 w 1303
had 8 w 1306
been 1 w 1310
four 1 w 1314
talents 1 w 1321
in 23 w 1323
the 32 w 1326
house 2 w 1331
and 7 w 1335
in 24 w 1337
her 16 w 1340
custody 1 w 1347
as 12 w 1350
he 57 w 1352
alleges 1 w 1359
don 1 w 1363
t 132 w 1365
you 3 w 1368
imagine 1 w 1375
he 58 w 1377
would 6 w 1382
have 8 w 1386
raced 1 w 1391
to 17 w 1393
get 2 w 1396
possession 2 w 1406
both 2 w 1410
of 14 w 1412
her 17 w 1415
and 8 w 1418
of 15 w 1420
them 5 w 1424
Would 1 w 1430
he 61 w 1432
have 9 w 1436
joined 1 w 1442
with 2 w 1446
his 10 w 1449
co-trustees 1 w 1460
in 27 w 1462
so 3 w 1464
shamefully 1 w 1474
plundering 1 w 1484
my 6 w 1486
visible 1 w 1493
property 4 w 1501
which 1 w 1507
many 1 w 1511
of 16 w 1513
you 4 w 1516
knew 1 w 1520
had 9 w 1523
been 2 w 1527
left 3 w 1531
me 6 w 1533
and 9 w 1537
have 10 w 1541
refrained 1 w 1550
when 2 w 1555
he 63 w 1557
had 10 w 1560
the 34 w 1563
chance 1 w 1569
from 4 w 1574
seizing 1 w 1581
a 112 w 1582
fund 1 w 1586
to 18 w 1588
the 35 w 1591
existence 1 w 1600
of 17 w 1602
which 2 w 1607
you 5 w 1610
would 7 w 1615
not 5 w 1618
be 5 w 1620
able 4 w 1624
to 19 w 1626
testify 1 w 1633
Who 1 w 1637
can 1 w 1640
believe 1 w 1647
this 5 w 1651
It 1 w 1654
is 18 w 1656
impossible 1 w 1666
men 4 w 1670
of 18 w 1672
the 36 w 1675
jury 1 w 1679
it 15 w 1682
is 19 w 1684
impossible 2 w 1694
No 2 w 1697
all 5 w 1701
the 37 w 1704
money 4 w 1709
which 3 w 1714
my 7 w 1716
father 3 w 1722
left 4 w 1726
was 7 w 1729
indeed 1 w 1735
buried 1 w 1741
on 19 w 1743
the 39 w 1746
day 1 w 1749
on 20 w 1751
which 4 w 1756
it 16 w 1758
came 1 w 1762
into 2 w 1766
the 40 w 1769
hands 2 w 1774
of 19 w 1776
these 2 w 1781
men 5 w 1784
and 11 w 1788
the 42 w 1791
defendant 1 w 1800
not 6 w 1804
being 1 w 1809
able 5 w 1813
to 21 w 1815
tell 1 w 1819
when 3 w 1823
and 12 w 1826
where 1 w 1831
he 75 w 1833
paid 2 w 1837
back 2 w 1841
any 3 w 1844
of 20 w 1846
it 17 w 1848
makes 1 w 1854
use 3 w 1857
of 21 w 1859
these 3 w 1864
arguments 1 w 1873
hoping 1 w 1880
that 10 w 1884
I 6 w 1885
may 1 w 1888
seem 1 w 1892
to 22 w 1894
be 8 w 1896
a 132 w 1897
rich 1 w 1901
man 3 w 1904
and 13 w 1908
so 4 w 1910
meet 1 w 1914
with 3 w 1918
no 10 w 1920
compassion 1 w 1930
from 5 w 1934
you 6 w 1937
I 7 w 1939
have 11 w 1943
many 2 w 1947
other 4 w 1952
charges 1 w 1959
to 23 w 1961
make 3 w 1965
against 1 w 1972
him 3 w 1975
but 2 w 1979
I 8 w 1980
have 12 w 1984
not 7 w 1987
the 45 w 1990
right 1 w 1995
to 24 w 1997
speak 1 w 2002
of 22 w 2004
the 46 w 2007
injuries 1 w 2015
I 9 w 2016
myself 1 w 2022
have 13 w 2026
suffered 1 w 2034
when 4 w 2039
the 47 w 2042
witness 1 w 2049
is 20 w 2051
in 37 w 2053
danger 1 w 2059
of 23 w 2061
losing 1 w 2067
his 12 w 2070
civic 1 w 2075
rights 1 w 2081
Still 1 w 2087
I 10 w 2088
wish 1 w 2092
to 25 w 2094
read 3 w 2098
to 26 w 2100
you 7 w 2103
a 147 w 2104
challenge 1 w 2113
for 1 w 2117
you 8 w 2120
will 1 w 2124
know 2 w 2128
when 5 w 2133
you 9 w 2136
have 14 w 2140
heard 1 w 2145
it 20 w 2147
that 11 w 2152
the 48 w 2155
testimony 1 w 2164
was 8 w 2167
true 1 w 2171
and 14 w 2175
that 12 w 2179
Aphobus 2 w 2186
who 3 w 2190
now 3 w 2193
declares 1 w 2201
that 13 w 2205
he 85 w 2207
demands 1 w 2214
Milyas 1 w 2220
to 27 w 2222
be 9 w 2224
examined 1 w 2232
about 2 w 2237
all 7 w 2240
the 49 w 2243
matters 1 w 2250
involved 1 w 2258
in 41 w 2260
the 50 w 2263
suit 1 w 2267
at 22 w 2270
first 1 w 2275
demanded 1 w 2283
him 4 w 2286
only 1 w 2290
in 42 w 2292
regard 1 w 2298
to 28 w 2300
a 166 w 2301
question 1 w 2309
of 24 w 2311
thirty 1 w 2317
minae 3 w 2322
and 17 w 2326
furthermore 1 w 2338
that 14 w 2343
he 89 w 2345
has 1 w 2348
been 3 w 2352
put 3 w 2355
to 29 w 2357
no 14 w 2359
disadvantage 1 w 2371
because 1 w 2378
of 25 w 2380
the 52 w 2383
testimony 2 w 2392