Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Aphobus I

Against Aphobus I (54-57)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg027.perseus-eng2:54-57
Refs {'start': {'reference': '54', 'human_reference': 'Section 54'}, 'end': {'reference': '57', 'human_reference': 'Section 57'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Yet he who dared to make such a statement put in no evidence to prove it, but relied on his bare word, as though you would lightly give him credence. When one asks him upon what he has spent so much of my money, he says he has paid debts for me, and so represents me as poor; yet, when it pleases him, he makes me rich, as it seems, seeing that my father left such a sum of money in the house. It is easy to see, however, from many considerations that he is lying, and that there is no basis of fact in this story.

For if my father had no confidence in these men, it is plain that he would neither have entrusted to them the rest of his property, nor, if he had left this money in the way alleged, would he have told them of it. It would have been the height of madness to tell them of hidden treasure, when he was not going to make them trustees even of his visible property. But if he had confidence in them, he would not, I take it, have given into their hands the bulk of his property, and not have put them in control of this. Nor would he have entrusted this remainder to my mother to keep, and then have given her herself in marriage to this man who was one of the guardians. For it is not reasonable that he should seek to secure the money through my mother, and yet to put one of the men whom he distrusted in control both of her and of it.

Furthermore, if there were any truth in all this, do you suppose Aphobus would not have taken my mother to wife, bequeathed to him as she was by my father? He had already taken her marriage-portionthe eighty minaeas though he were going to marry her; but he subsequently married the daughter of Philonides of Melite[*] But if there had been four talents in the house and in her custody, as he alleges, dont you imagine he would have raced to get possession both of her and of them.

Would he have joined with his co-trustees in so shamefully plundering my visible property, which many of you knew had been left me, and have refrained, when he had the chance, from seizing a fund to the evidence of which you would not be able to testify? Who can believe this? It is impossible, men of the jury; it is impossible. No; my father entrusted to these men all the property which he left, and the defendant will tell this story, that I may meet with less compassion from you.

Tokens

Yet 1 w 3
he 1 w 5
who 1 w 8
dared 1 w 13
to 1 w 15
make 1 w 19
such 1 w 23
a 3 w 24
statement 1 w 33
put 1 w 36
in 1 w 38
no 1 w 40
evidence 1 w 48
to 2 w 50
prove 1 w 55
it 1 w 57
but 1 w 61
relied 1 w 67
on 1 w 69
his 1 w 72
bare 1 w 76
word 1 w 80
as 1 w 83
though 1 w 89
you 1 w 92
would 1 w 97
lightly 1 w 104
give 1 w 108
him 1 w 111
credence 1 w 119
When 1 w 124
one 1 w 127
asks 1 w 131
him 2 w 134
upon 1 w 138
what 1 w 142
he 3 w 144
has 1 w 147
spent 1 w 152
so 1 w 154
much 1 w 158
of 1 w 160
my 1 w 162
money 1 w 167
he 4 w 170
says 1 w 174
he 5 w 176
has 2 w 179
paid 1 w 183
debts 1 w 188
for 1 w 191
me 2 w 193
and 1 w 197
so 2 w 199
represents 1 w 209
me 3 w 211
as 5 w 213
poor 1 w 217
yet 1 w 221
when 1 w 226
it 2 w 228
pleases 1 w 235
him 3 w 238
he 7 w 241
makes 1 w 246
me 4 w 248
rich 1 w 252
as 7 w 255
it 3 w 257
seems 1 w 262
seeing 1 w 269
that 1 w 273
my 2 w 275
father 1 w 281
left 1 w 285
such 2 w 289
a 20 w 290
sum 1 w 293
of 2 w 295
money 2 w 300
in 3 w 302
the 2 w 305
house 1 w 310
It 1 w 313
is 2 w 315
easy 1 w 319
to 3 w 321
see 3 w 324
however 1 w 332
from 1 w 337
many 1 w 341
considerations 1 w 355
that 2 w 359
he 10 w 361
is 3 w 363
lying 1 w 368
and 2 w 372
that 3 w 376
there 1 w 381
is 4 w 383
no 2 w 385
basis 1 w 390
of 3 w 392
fact 1 w 396
in 5 w 398
this 1 w 402
story 1 w 407
For 1 w 411
if 1 w 413
my 3 w 415
father 2 w 421
had 1 w 424
no 3 w 426
confidence 1 w 436
in 6 w 438
these 1 w 443
men 2 w 446
it 4 w 449
is 7 w 451
plain 1 w 456
that 4 w 460
he 14 w 462
would 2 w 467
neither 1 w 474
have 1 w 478
entrusted 1 w 487
to 5 w 489
them 1 w 493
the 8 w 496
rest 1 w 500
of 4 w 502
his 3 w 505
property 1 w 513
nor 1 w 517
if 2 w 520
he 18 w 522
had 2 w 525
left 2 w 529
this 2 w 533
money 3 w 538
in 8 w 540
the 9 w 543
way 1 w 546
alleged 1 w 553
would 3 w 559
he 20 w 561
have 2 w 565
told 1 w 569
them 2 w 573
of 5 w 575
it 6 w 577
It 2 w 580
would 4 w 585
have 3 w 589
been 1 w 593
the 11 w 596
height 1 w 602
of 6 w 604
madness 1 w 611
to 7 w 613
tell 1 w 617
them 3 w 621
of 7 w 623
hidden 1 w 629
treasure 1 w 637
when 2 w 642
he 26 w 644
was 1 w 647
not 1 w 650
going 1 w 655
to 8 w 657
make 3 w 661
them 4 w 665
trustees 1 w 673
even 1 w 677
of 8 w 679
his 5 w 682
visible 1 w 689
property 2 w 697
But 1 w 701
if 3 w 703
he 28 w 705
had 3 w 708
confidence 2 w 718
in 10 w 720
them 5 w 724
he 30 w 727
would 5 w 732
not 2 w 735
I 3 w 737
take 1 w 741
it 7 w 743
have 4 w 748
given 1 w 753
into 1 w 757
their 1 w 762
hands 1 w 767
the 16 w 770
bulk 1 w 774
of 9 w 776
his 6 w 779
property 3 w 787
and 4 w 791
not 3 w 794
have 5 w 798
put 2 w 801
them 6 w 805
in 12 w 807
control 1 w 814
of 10 w 816
this 3 w 820
Nor 1 w 824
would 6 w 829
he 34 w 831
have 6 w 835
entrusted 2 w 844
this 4 w 848
remainder 1 w 857
to 10 w 859
my 4 w 861
mother 1 w 867
to 11 w 869
keep 1 w 873
and 5 w 877
then 1 w 881
have 7 w 885
given 2 w 890
her 6 w 893
herself 1 w 900
in 14 w 902
marriage 1 w 910
to 12 w 912
this 5 w 916
man 2 w 919
who 2 w 922
was 2 w 925
one 5 w 928
of 11 w 930
the 20 w 933
guardians 1 w 942
For 2 w 946
it 8 w 948
is 16 w 950
not 4 w 953
reasonable 1 w 963
that 5 w 967
he 40 w 969
should 1 w 975
seek 1 w 979
to 13 w 981
secure 1 w 987
the 21 w 990
money 4 w 995
through 1 w 1002
my 5 w 1004
mother 2 w 1010
and 6 w 1014
yet 2 w 1017
to 14 w 1019
put 3 w 1022
one 7 w 1025
of 12 w 1027
the 23 w 1030
men 3 w 1033
whom 1 w 1037
he 44 w 1039
distrusted 1 w 1049
in 15 w 1051
control 2 w 1058
both 1 w 1062
of 13 w 1064
her 9 w 1067
and 7 w 1070
of 14 w 1072
it 9 w 1074
Furthermore 1 w 1086
if 4 w 1089
there 2 w 1094
were 1 w 1098
any 2 w 1101
truth 1 w 1106
in 16 w 1108
all 2 w 1111
this 6 w 1115
do 1 w 1118
you 2 w 1121
suppose 1 w 1128
Aphobus 1 w 1135
would 7 w 1140
not 5 w 1143
have 8 w 1147
taken 1 w 1152
my 6 w 1154
mother 3 w 1160
to 15 w 1162
wife 1 w 1166
bequeathed 1 w 1177
to 16 w 1179
him 4 w 1182
as 14 w 1184
she 1 w 1187
was 3 w 1190
by 1 w 1192
my 7 w 1194
father 3 w 1200
He 1 w 1203
had 4 w 1206
already 1 w 1213
taken 2 w 1218
her 14 w 1221
marriage-portion 1 w 1237
the 29 w 1241
eighty 1 w 1247
minae 1 w 1252
as 16 w 1255
though 2 w 1261
he 54 w 1263
were 2 w 1267
going 2 w 1272
to 17 w 1274
marry 1 w 1279
her 15 w 1282
but 2 w 1286
he 56 w 1288
subsequently 1 w 1300
married 1 w 1307
the 30 w 1310
daughter 1 w 1318
of 15 w 1320
Philonides 1 w 1330
of 16 w 1332
Melite 1 w 1338
Melite 2 w 1344
was 4 w 1347
a 84 w 1348
deme 1 w 1352
of 17 w 1354
the 31 w 1357
tribe 1 w 1362
Cecropis 1 w 1370
But 2 w 1374
if 6 w 1376
there 3 w 1381
had 5 w 1384
been 2 w 1388
four 1 w 1392
talents 1 w 1399
in 19 w 1401
the 33 w 1404
house 2 w 1409
and 8 w 1412
in 20 w 1414
her 17 w 1417
custody 1 w 1424
as 18 w 1427
he 62 w 1429
alleges 1 w 1436
don 1 w 1440
t 140 w 1442
you 3 w 1445
imagine 1 w 1452
he 63 w 1454
would 8 w 1459
have 9 w 1463
raced 1 w 1468
to 19 w 1470
get 1 w 1473
possession 1 w 1483
both 2 w 1487
of 18 w 1489
her 18 w 1492
and 9 w 1495
of 19 w 1497
them 7 w 1501
Would 1 w 1507
he 66 w 1509
have 10 w 1513
joined 1 w 1519
with 1 w 1523
his 11 w 1526
co-trustees 1 w 1537
in 23 w 1539
so 4 w 1541
shamefully 1 w 1551
plundering 1 w 1561
my 8 w 1563
visible 2 w 1570
property 4 w 1578
which 1 w 1584
many 2 w 1588
of 20 w 1590
you 4 w 1593
knew 1 w 1597
had 6 w 1600
been 3 w 1604
left 3 w 1608
me 9 w 1610
and 10 w 1614
have 11 w 1618
refrained 1 w 1627
when 3 w 1632
he 68 w 1634
had 7 w 1637
the 35 w 1640
chance 1 w 1646
from 2 w 1651
seizing 1 w 1658
a 103 w 1659
fund 1 w 1663
to 20 w 1665
the 36 w 1668
evidence 2 w 1676
of 21 w 1678
which 2 w 1683
you 5 w 1686
would 9 w 1691
not 6 w 1694
be 6 w 1696
able 2 w 1700
to 21 w 1702
testify 1 w 1709
Who 1 w 1713
can 1 w 1716
believe 1 w 1723
this 7 w 1727
It 3 w 1730
is 23 w 1732
impossible 1 w 1742
men 4 w 1746
of 22 w 1748
the 37 w 1751
jury 1 w 1755
it 13 w 1758
is 24 w 1760
impossible 2 w 1770
No 2 w 1773
my 9 w 1776
father 4 w 1782
entrusted 3 w 1791
to 22 w 1793
these 2 w 1798
men 5 w 1801
all 4 w 1804
the 40 w 1807
property 5 w 1815
which 3 w 1820
he 75 w 1822
left 4 w 1826
and 11 w 1830
the 41 w 1833
defendant 1 w 1842
will 1 w 1846
tell 2 w 1850
this 8 w 1854
story 2 w 1859
that 6 w 1864
I 5 w 1865
may 1 w 1868
meet 1 w 1872
with 2 w 1876
less 1 w 1880
compassion 1 w 1890
from 3 w 1894
you 6 w 1897