Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Aristogeiton I

Against Aristogeiton I (66-70)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg025.perseus-eng2:66-70
Refs {'start': {'reference': '66', 'human_reference': 'Section 66'}, 'end': {'reference': '70', 'human_reference': 'Section 70'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

then he must clearly be ill-disposed to those who have destroyed them and to their laws and their constitution. But if he has no regard for these things, I should like to know who that sees how he has renounced all affection for his parents, can believe in his pretended zeal for the people; for the man who neglects his parents I regard as unworthy of trust and hateful alike to gods and men.

But I shall be told it is because you condemned him on information laid and twice put him and his brother into prison; it is for this reason that he is your well-wisher. But that too is ridiculous. Or because you disqualified him for the office to which he had been allotted? Or because you found him guilty of a breach of the constitution? Or because you fined him ten talents? Or because you habitually point the finger of scorn at him as the vilest of all men in the world?

Or because, as long as the present laws and constitution stand, he cannot clear himself of these reproaches? Then why is he well-disposed to you? It is because, in his own words, he is impudent. Why is the impudent man so called save because, being lost to a sense of shame, he dares to state what is not, and never will be, true? And that is precisely what the defendant does.

Now there are some facts about the information laid against him which Lycurgus seems to have passed over, but which I had better lay before you; for I think you should examine the defendant and the rights of the present case as carefully as you would scrutinize a private debt. Suppose then that A accused B of owing him money, and B denied it. If the registered terms of the loan were still to be read, or if the pillars which marked the mortgaged property were still standing, you would clearly regard as impudent the man who denied the transaction; but if it was shown that these proofs no longer existed, then you would regard the accuser as impudent. That is natural.

Well, of Aristogeitons debt to the State the terms still exist, namely the laws under which all defaulters are registered; and the pillar is the wooden table of the law deposited in the temple of the Goddess. Now if these have been destroyed and the debt wiped out, we are talking nonsense, or rather telling lies; but if they are still in existence and will remain valid until he pays his debt, then there is no truth in his plea, but he is committing a serious crime in trying to suppress the rights of the State.

Tokens

then 1 w 4
he 2 w 6
must 1 w 10
clearly 1 w 17
be 1 w 19
ill-disposed 1 w 31
to 1 w 33
those 1 w 38
who 1 w 41
have 1 w 45
destroyed 1 w 54
them 1 w 58
and 1 w 61
to 2 w 63
their 1 w 68
laws 1 w 72
and 2 w 75
their 2 w 80
constitution 1 w 92
But 1 w 96
if 1 w 98
he 6 w 100
has 1 w 103
no 1 w 105
regard 1 w 111
for 1 w 114
these 1 w 119
things 1 w 125
I 1 w 127
should 1 w 133
like 1 w 137
to 3 w 139
know 1 w 143
who 2 w 146
that 1 w 150
sees 1 w 154
how 1 w 157
he 8 w 159
has 2 w 162
renounced 1 w 171
all 1 w 174
affection 1 w 183
for 2 w 186
his 1 w 189
parents 1 w 196
can 1 w 200
believe 1 w 207
in 2 w 209
his 2 w 212
pretended 1 w 221
zeal 1 w 225
for 3 w 228
the 6 w 231
people 1 w 237
for 4 w 241
the 7 w 244
man 1 w 247
who 3 w 250
neglects 1 w 258
his 3 w 261
parents 2 w 268
I 2 w 269
regard 2 w 275
as 3 w 277
unworthy 1 w 285
of 1 w 287
trust 1 w 292
and 3 w 295
hateful 1 w 302
alike 1 w 307
to 4 w 309
gods 1 w 313
and 4 w 316
men 1 w 319
But 2 w 323
I 3 w 324
shall 1 w 329
be 3 w 331
told 1 w 335
it 2 w 337
is 5 w 339
because 1 w 346
you 1 w 349
condemned 1 w 358
him 1 w 361
on 5 w 363
information 1 w 374
laid 1 w 378
and 5 w 381
twice 1 w 386
put 1 w 389
him 2 w 392
and 6 w 395
his 4 w 398
brother 1 w 405
into 1 w 409
prison 1 w 415
it 3 w 418
is 8 w 420
for 6 w 423
this 1 w 427
reason 1 w 433
that 2 w 437
he 12 w 439
is 10 w 441
your 1 w 445
well-wisher 1 w 456
But 3 w 460
that 3 w 464
too 1 w 467
is 12 w 469
ridiculous 1 w 479
Or 1 w 482
because 2 w 489
you 3 w 492
disqualified 1 w 504
him 3 w 507
for 7 w 510
the 9 w 513
office 1 w 519
to 8 w 521
which 1 w 526
he 15 w 528
had 1 w 531
been 1 w 535
allotted 1 w 543
Or 2 w 546
because 3 w 553
you 4 w 556
found 1 w 561
him 4 w 564
guilty 1 w 570
of 3 w 572
a 37 w 573
breach 1 w 579
of 4 w 581
the 10 w 584
constitution 2 w 596
Or 3 w 599
because 4 w 606
you 5 w 609
fined 1 w 614
him 5 w 617
ten 2 w 620
talents 1 w 627
Or 4 w 630
because 5 w 637
you 6 w 640
habitually 1 w 650
point 1 w 655
the 11 w 658
finger 1 w 664
of 5 w 666
scorn 1 w 671
at 6 w 673
him 6 w 676
as 5 w 678
the 12 w 681
vilest 1 w 687
of 6 w 689
all 5 w 692
men 2 w 695
in 8 w 697
the 13 w 700
world 1 w 705
Or 5 w 708
because 6 w 715
as 6 w 718
long 1 w 722
as 7 w 724
the 14 w 727
present 1 w 734
laws 2 w 738
and 7 w 741
constitution 3 w 753
stand 1 w 758
he 21 w 761
cannot 1 w 767
clear 2 w 772
himself 1 w 779
of 7 w 781
these 2 w 786
reproaches 1 w 796
Then 1 w 801
why 1 w 804
is 14 w 806
he 25 w 808
well-disposed 1 w 821
to 9 w 823
you 7 w 826
It 1 w 829
is 16 w 831
because 7 w 838
in 9 w 841
his 6 w 844
own 1 w 847
words 1 w 852
he 26 w 855
is 18 w 857
impudent 1 w 865
Why 1 w 869
is 19 w 871
the 16 w 874
impudent 2 w 882
man 2 w 885
so 3 w 887
called 1 w 893
save 1 w 897
because 8 w 904
being 1 w 910
lost 1 w 914
to 10 w 916
a 61 w 917
sense 1 w 922
of 8 w 924
shame 1 w 929
he 28 w 932
dares 1 w 937
to 11 w 939
state 1 w 944
what 1 w 948
is 20 w 950
not 2 w 953
and 9 w 957
never 1 w 962
will 1 w 966
be 14 w 968
true 1 w 973
And 1 w 977
that 4 w 981
is 21 w 983
precisely 1 w 992
what 2 w 996
the 17 w 999
defendant 1 w 1008
does 1 w 1012
Now 1 w 1016
there 1 w 1021
are 4 w 1024
some 1 w 1028
facts 1 w 1033
about 1 w 1038
the 19 w 1041
information 2 w 1052
laid 2 w 1056
against 1 w 1063
him 8 w 1066
which 2 w 1071
Lycurgus 1 w 1079
seems 1 w 1084
to 12 w 1086
have 2 w 1090
passed 1 w 1096
over 1 w 1100
but 1 w 1104
which 3 w 1109
I 5 w 1110
had 2 w 1113
better 1 w 1119
lay 1 w 1122
before 1 w 1128
you 8 w 1131
for 10 w 1135
I 6 w 1136
think 1 w 1141
you 9 w 1144
should 2 w 1150
examine 1 w 1157
the 20 w 1160
defendant 2 w 1169
and 10 w 1172
the 21 w 1175
rights 1 w 1181
of 9 w 1183
the 22 w 1186
present 2 w 1193
case 1 w 1197
as 10 w 1199
carefully 1 w 1208
as 11 w 1210
you 10 w 1213
would 1 w 1218
scrutinize 1 w 1228
a 88 w 1229
private 1 w 1236
debt 1 w 1240
Suppose 1 w 1248
then 2 w 1252
that 5 w 1256
A 2 w 1257
accused 1 w 1264
B 4 w 1265
of 10 w 1267
owing 1 w 1272
him 9 w 1275
money 1 w 1280
and 11 w 1284
B 5 w 1285
denied 1 w 1291
it 7 w 1293
If 1 w 1296
the 24 w 1299
registered 1 w 1309
terms 1 w 1314
of 11 w 1316
the 25 w 1319
loan 1 w 1323
were 1 w 1327
still 1 w 1332
to 13 w 1334
be 17 w 1336
read 1 w 1340
or 15 w 1343
if 3 w 1345
the 26 w 1348
pillars 1 w 1355
which 4 w 1360
marked 1 w 1366
the 27 w 1369
mortgaged 1 w 1378
property 1 w 1386
were 2 w 1390
still 2 w 1395
standing 1 w 1403
you 11 w 1407
would 2 w 1412
clearly 2 w 1419
regard 3 w 1425
as 12 w 1427
impudent 3 w 1435
the 28 w 1438
man 3 w 1441
who 4 w 1444
denied 2 w 1450
the 29 w 1453
transaction 1 w 1464
but 2 w 1468
if 4 w 1470
it 8 w 1472
was 1 w 1475
shown 1 w 1480
that 6 w 1484
these 3 w 1489
proofs 1 w 1495
no 6 w 1497
longer 1 w 1503
existed 1 w 1510
then 3 w 1515
you 12 w 1518
would 3 w 1523
regard 4 w 1529
the 32 w 1532
accuser 1 w 1539
as 14 w 1541
impudent 4 w 1549
That 1 w 1554
is 25 w 1556
natural 1 w 1563
Well 1 w 1568
of 13 w 1571
Aristogeiton 1 w 1583
s 112 w 1585
debt 2 w 1589
to 16 w 1591
the 33 w 1594
State 1 w 1599
the 34 w 1602
terms 2 w 1607
still 3 w 1612
exist 2 w 1617
namely 1 w 1624
the 35 w 1627
laws 3 w 1631
under 1 w 1636
which 5 w 1641
all 7 w 1644
defaulters 1 w 1654
are 6 w 1657
registered 2 w 1667
and 13 w 1671
the 36 w 1674
pillar 2 w 1680
is 29 w 1682
the 37 w 1685
wooden 1 w 1691
table 1 w 1696
of 14 w 1698
the 38 w 1701
law 4 w 1704
deposited 1 w 1713
in 18 w 1715
the 39 w 1718
temple 1 w 1724
of 15 w 1726
the 40 w 1729
Goddess 1 w 1736
Now 2 w 1740
if 5 w 1742
these 4 w 1747
have 3 w 1751
been 2 w 1755
destroyed 2 w 1764
and 14 w 1767
the 42 w 1770
debt 3 w 1774
wiped 1 w 1779
out 2 w 1782
we 5 w 1785
are 7 w 1788
talking 1 w 1795
nonsense 1 w 1803
or 17 w 1806
rather 1 w 1812
telling 1 w 1819
lies 1 w 1823
but 3 w 1827
if 6 w 1829
they 1 w 1833
are 8 w 1836
still 4 w 1841
in 21 w 1843
existence 1 w 1852
and 15 w 1855
will 2 w 1859
remain 1 w 1865
valid 1 w 1870
until 1 w 1875
he 57 w 1877
pays 1 w 1881
his 7 w 1884
debt 4 w 1888
then 4 w 1893
there 2 w 1898
is 32 w 1900
no 8 w 1902
truth 1 w 1907
in 23 w 1909
his 8 w 1912
plea 1 w 1916
but 4 w 1920
he 60 w 1922
is 34 w 1924
committing 1 w 1934
a 134 w 1935
serious 1 w 1942
crime 1 w 1947
in 25 w 1949
trying 1 w 1955
to 17 w 1957
suppress 1 w 1965
the 47 w 1968
rights 2 w 1974
of 16 w 1976
the 48 w 1979
State 2 w 1984