Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Leptines

Against Leptines (146-147)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg020.perseus-eng2:146-147
Refs {'start': {'reference': '146', 'human_reference': 'Section 146'}, 'end': {'reference': '147', 'human_reference': 'Section 147'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

There are advocates appointed to defend the law, and very able speakers they are; Leodamas of Acharnae, Aristophon of Hazenia, Cephisodotus of Ceramicus, and Dinias of Herchia.[*] Let me tell you, then, how you may reasonably retort upon them, and do you consider whether the retort is fair.[*] Take Leodamas first. It was he who impeached the grant to Chabrias,[*] which included among other things the gift of immunity, and when his case came before you, he lost it.

Now the laws forbid the same man to be tried twice on the same issue, be it a civil action, a scrutiny, a contested claim, or anything else of the sort. But quite apart from all this, it would be a most absurd result if on the first occasion the services of Chabrias outweighed the arguments of Leodamas, but when to his services were added those of all the other benefactors, then the combined effect should be weaker than the arguments.

Tokens

There 1 w 5
are 1 w 8
advocates 1 w 17
appointed 1 w 26
to 1 w 28
defend 1 w 34
the 1 w 37
law 1 w 40
and 1 w 44
very 1 w 48
able 1 w 52
speakers 1 w 60
they 1 w 64
are 2 w 67
Leodamas 1 w 76
of 1 w 78
Acharnae 1 w 86
Aristophon 1 w 97
of 2 w 99
Hazenia 1 w 106
Cephisodotus 1 w 119
of 3 w 121
Ceramicus 1 w 130
and 2 w 134
Dinias 1 w 140
of 4 w 142
Herchia 1 w 149
These 1 w 155
were 1 w 159
the 3 w 162
four 1 w 166
advocates 2 w 175
nominated 1 w 184
by 1 w 186
the 4 w 189
people 1 w 195
with 1 w 200
Leptines 1 w 208
as 3 w 210
a 24 w 211
fifth 1 w 216
to 3 w 219
defend 2 w 225
the 5 w 228
law 2 w 231
Aristophon 2 w 242
the 6 w 246
best 1 w 250
known 1 w 255
was 1 w 259
the 7 w 262
leading 1 w 269
Athenian 1 w 277
statesman 1 w 286
before 1 w 292
the 9 w 295
rise 1 w 299
of 5 w 301
Eubulus 1 w 308
He 2 w 311
was 2 w 314
now 2 w 317
nearly 1 w 323
eighty 1 w 329
years 1 w 334
old 1 w 337
and 3 w 341
could 1 w 346
boast 1 w 351
that 1 w 355
he 12 w 357
had 1 w 360
been 1 w 364
75 1 w 366
times 1 w 371
defendant 1 w 380
in 6 w 382
a 39 w 383
γραφὴ 1 w 388
παρανόμων 1 w 397
and 4 w 400
had 2 w 403
always 1 w 409
acquitted 1 w 418
Let 1 w 422
me 2 w 424
tell 1 w 428
you 1 w 431
then 2 w 436
how 1 w 440
you 2 w 443
may 1 w 446
reasonably 1 w 456
retort 1 w 462
upon 1 w 466
them 1 w 470
and 5 w 474
do 2 w 476
you 3 w 479
consider 1 w 487
whether 1 w 494
the 13 w 497
retort 2 w 503
is 5 w 505
fair 1 w 509
Demosthenes 1 w 521
suggests 1 w 529
that 2 w 533
the 15 w 536
personal 1 w 544
record 1 w 550
of 6 w 552
the 16 w 555
advocates 3 w 564
should 1 w 570
lead 2 w 574
the 17 w 577
jury 1 w 581
to 7 w 583
reject 1 w 589
their 1 w 594
arguments 1 w 603
Take 1 w 608
Leodamas 2 w 616
first 1 w 621
It 1 w 624
was 3 w 627
he 23 w 629
who 1 w 632
impeached 1 w 641
the 19 w 644
grant 1 w 649
to 8 w 651
Chabrias 1 w 659
See 1 w 663
Dem 2 w 666
20 1 w 669
77 1 w 672
which 1 w 678
included 1 w 686
among 1 w 691
other 1 w 696
things 1 w 702
the 21 w 705
gift 1 w 709
of 7 w 711
immunity 1 w 719
and 6 w 723
when 1 w 727
his 2 w 730
case 1 w 734
came 1 w 738
before 2 w 744
you 4 w 747
he 29 w 750
lost 1 w 754
it 4 w 756
Now 1 w 760
the 22 w 763
laws 1 w 767
forbid 1 w 773
the 23 w 776
same 1 w 780
man 2 w 783
to 9 w 785
be 5 w 787
tried 1 w 792
twice 1 w 797
on 8 w 799
the 24 w 802
same 2 w 806
issue 1 w 811
be 6 w 814
it 5 w 816
a 72 w 817
civil 1 w 822
action 1 w 828
a 74 w 830
scrutiny 1 w 838
a 75 w 840
contested 1 w 849
claim 1 w 854
or 7 w 857
anything 1 w 865
else 1 w 869
of 8 w 871
the 25 w 874
sort 1 w 878
But 1 w 882
quite 1 w 887
apart 1 w 892
from 1 w 896
all 1 w 899
this 1 w 903
it 7 w 906
would 1 w 911
be 7 w 913
a 81 w 914
most 2 w 918
absurd 1 w 924
result 1 w 930
if 3 w 932
on 11 w 934
the 26 w 937
first 2 w 942
occasion 1 w 950
the 27 w 953
services 1 w 961
of 9 w 963
Chabrias 2 w 971
outweighed 1 w 981
the 28 w 984
arguments 2 w 993
of 10 w 995
Leodamas 3 w 1003
but 1 w 1007
when 2 w 1011
to 10 w 1013
his 4 w 1016
services 2 w 1024
were 2 w 1028
added 1 w 1033
those 1 w 1038
of 11 w 1040
all 2 w 1043
the 29 w 1046
other 2 w 1051
benefactors 1 w 1062
then 4 w 1067
the 32 w 1070
combined 1 w 1078
effect 1 w 1084
should 2 w 1090
be 9 w 1092
weaker 1 w 1098
than 1 w 1102
the 33 w 1105
arguments 3 w 1114