Scaife ATLAS

On Halonnesus (25)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg007.perseus-eng2:25

Refs	`{'start': {'reference': '25', 'human_reference': 'Section 25'}}`
Ancestors	`[]`
Children	`[]`

plain text • XML

So it was this decree of Philocrates that was unconstitutional, nor would it have been possible to draft a constitutional proposal in conformity with his unconstitutional decree. By drafting mine to agree with the earlier decrees, which were constitutional and which also kept your territory intact, I both kept within the constitution and was able to convict Philip of trying to deceive you and of wishing, not to amend the peace, but to bring discredit on those who were pleading your cause.

Tokens

So	1	w	2
it	1	w	4
was	1	w	7
this	1	w	11
decree	1	w	17
of	1	w	19
Philocrates	1	w	30
that	1	w	34
was	2	w	37
unconstitutional	1	w	53
nor	1	w	57
would	1	w	62
it	3	w	64
have	1	w	68
been	1	w	72
possible	1	w	80
to	1	w	82
draft	1	w	87
a	8	w	88
constitutional	2	w	102
proposal	1	w	110
in	1	w	112
conformity	1	w	122
with	1	w	126
his	2	w	129
unconstitutional	2	w	145
decree	2	w	151
By	1	w	154
drafting	1	w	162
mine	1	w	166
to	2	w	168
agree	1	w	173
with	2	w	177
the	1	w	180
earlier	1	w	187
decrees	1	w	194
which	1	w	200
were	1	w	204
constitutional	4	w	218
and	1	w	221
which	2	w	226
also	1	w	230
kept	1	w	234
your	1	w	238
territory	1	w	247
intact	1	w	253
I	1	w	255
both	1	w	259
kept	2	w	263
within	1	w	269
the	2	w	272
constitution	5	w	284
and	2	w	287
was	3	w	290
able	1	w	294
to	4	w	296
convict	1	w	303
Philip	1	w	309
of	2	w	311
trying	1	w	317
to	5	w	319
deceive	1	w	326
you	2	w	329
and	3	w	332
of	3	w	334
wishing	1	w	341
not	1	w	345
to	6	w	347
amend	1	w	352
the	3	w	355
peace	1	w	360
but	1	w	364
to	7	w	366
bring	1	w	371
discredit	1	w	380
on	13	w	382
those	1	w	387
who	1	w	390
were	2	w	394
pleading	1	w	402
your	2	w	406
cause	1	w	411