Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / On Halonnesus

On Halonnesus (21-25)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg007.perseus-eng2:21-25
Refs {'start': {'reference': '21', 'human_reference': 'Section 21'}, 'end': {'reference': '25', 'human_reference': 'Section 25'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

His language was pretty much that of Philips present letter. For while accusing those of us who misrepresent Philip, he at the same time blamed you because, though Philip is eager to benefit you and prefers your friendship to that of any other state, you constantly thwart him, lending an ear to false accusers, who both beg money of him and slander him; for tales of that sort, when he is told that he was traduced and that you believed what was said, make him change his mind, since he finds himself distrusted by the very people whom it has been his aim to benefit.

Pytho therefore urged public speakers not to attack the peace, because it was not good policy to rescind it, but to amend any unsatisfactory clause, on the understanding that Philip was prepared to fall in with your suggestions. If, however, the speakers confined themselves to abusing Philip without drafting any proposals which, while preserving the terms of peace, might clear Philip of suspicion, he asked you to pay no attention to such fellows.

And you approved these arguments and said that Pytho was right, as indeed he was. He made these statements, however, not in order that all those advantages that Philip had paid so much money to secure might be struck out of the treaty, but because he had been so instructed by his schoolmasters here in Athens, who did not imagine that anyone would propose to annul the decree of Philocrates, which lost us Amphipolis.

As for me, men of Athens, I did not venture to propose anything that was unconstitutional, but it was not so to propose the direct contrary of Philocrates decree, as I can prove to you. For the decree of Philocrates, through which you lost Amphipolis, was itself contrary to the earlier decrees by which you claimed possession of that territory.

So it was this decree of Philocrates that was unconstitutional, nor would it have been possible to draft a constitutional proposal in conformity with his unconstitutional decree. By drafting mine to agree with the earlier decrees, which were constitutional and which also kept your territory intact, I both kept within the constitution and was able to convict Philip of trying to deceive you and of wishing, not to amend the peace, but to bring discredit on those who were pleading your cause.

Tokens

His 1 w 3
language 1 w 11
was 1 w 14
pretty 1 w 20
much 1 w 24
that 1 w 28
of 1 w 30
Philip 1 w 36
s 3 w 38
present 1 w 45
letter 1 w 51
For 1 w 55
while 1 w 60
accusing 1 w 68
those 1 w 73
of 2 w 75
us 2 w 77
who 1 w 80
misrepresent 1 w 92
Philip 2 w 98
he 1 w 101
at 2 w 103
the 1 w 106
same 1 w 110
time 1 w 114
blamed 1 w 120
you 1 w 123
because 1 w 130
though 1 w 137
Philip 3 w 143
is 3 w 145
eager 1 w 150
to 1 w 152
benefit 1 w 159
you 2 w 162
and 1 w 165
prefers 1 w 172
your 1 w 176
friendship 1 w 186
to 2 w 188
that 2 w 192
of 3 w 194
any 1 w 197
other 1 w 202
state 1 w 207
you 4 w 211
constantly 1 w 221
thwart 1 w 227
him 1 w 230
lending 1 w 238
an 5 w 240
ear 1 w 243
to 3 w 245
false 1 w 250
accusers 1 w 258
who 2 w 262
both 1 w 266
beg 1 w 269
money 1 w 274
of 4 w 276
him 2 w 279
and 2 w 282
slander 1 w 289
him 3 w 292
for 1 w 296
tales 1 w 301
of 5 w 303
that 3 w 307
sort 1 w 311
when 1 w 316
he 5 w 318
is 4 w 320
told 1 w 324
that 4 w 328
he 6 w 330
was 2 w 333
traduced 1 w 341
and 4 w 344
that 5 w 348
you 5 w 351
believed 1 w 359
what 1 w 363
was 3 w 366
said 1 w 370
make 1 w 375
him 4 w 378
change 1 w 384
his 1 w 387
mind 1 w 391
since 1 w 397
he 7 w 399
finds 1 w 404
himself 1 w 411
distrusted 1 w 421
by 1 w 423
the 3 w 426
very 1 w 430
people 1 w 436
whom 1 w 440
it 2 w 442
has 1 w 445
been 1 w 449
his 2 w 452
aim 1 w 455
to 5 w 457
benefit 2 w 464
Pytho 1 w 470
therefore 1 w 479
urged 1 w 484
public 1 w 490
speakers 1 w 498
not 1 w 501
to 6 w 503
attack 1 w 509
the 5 w 512
peace 1 w 517
because 2 w 525
it 4 w 527
was 4 w 530
not 2 w 533
good 1 w 537
policy 1 w 543
to 7 w 545
rescind 1 w 552
it 5 w 554
but 1 w 558
to 8 w 560
amend 1 w 565
any 2 w 568
unsatisfactory 1 w 582
clause 1 w 588
on 3 w 591
the 6 w 594
understanding 1 w 607
that 6 w 611
Philip 4 w 617
was 5 w 620
prepared 1 w 628
to 10 w 630
fall 1 w 634
in 8 w 636
with 1 w 640
your 2 w 644
suggestions 1 w 655
If 1 w 658
however 1 w 666
the 7 w 670
speakers 2 w 678
confined 1 w 686
themselves 1 w 696
to 11 w 698
abusing 1 w 705
Philip 5 w 711
without 1 w 718
drafting 1 w 726
any 3 w 729
proposals 1 w 738
which 1 w 743
while 2 w 749
preserving 1 w 759
the 9 w 762
terms 1 w 767
of 6 w 769
peace 2 w 774
might 1 w 780
clear 1 w 785
Philip 6 w 791
of 7 w 793
suspicion 1 w 802
he 15 w 805
asked 1 w 810
you 7 w 813
to 12 w 815
pay 1 w 818
no 3 w 820
attention 1 w 829
to 13 w 831
such 1 w 835
fellows 1 w 842
And 1 w 846
you 8 w 849
approved 1 w 857
these 1 w 862
arguments 1 w 871
and 6 w 874
said 2 w 878
that 7 w 882
Pytho 2 w 887
was 6 w 890
right 1 w 895
as 9 w 898
indeed 1 w 904
he 17 w 906
was 7 w 909
He 1 w 912
made 1 w 916
these 2 w 921
statements 1 w 931
however 2 w 939
not 3 w 943
in 14 w 945
order 1 w 950
that 8 w 954
all 2 w 957
those 2 w 962
advantages 1 w 972
that 9 w 976
Philip 7 w 982
had 1 w 985
paid 1 w 989
so 2 w 991
much 2 w 995
money 2 w 1000
to 14 w 1002
secure 1 w 1008
might 2 w 1013
be 8 w 1015
struck 1 w 1021
out 2 w 1024
of 8 w 1026
the 12 w 1029
treaty 1 w 1035
but 2 w 1039
because 3 w 1046
he 20 w 1048
had 2 w 1051
been 2 w 1055
so 3 w 1057
instructed 1 w 1067
by 2 w 1069
his 3 w 1072
schoolmasters 1 w 1085
here 2 w 1089
in 16 w 1091
Athens 1 w 1097
who 4 w 1101
did 1 w 1104
not 4 w 1107
imagine 1 w 1114
that 10 w 1118
anyone 1 w 1124
would 1 w 1129
propose 1 w 1136
to 15 w 1138
annul 1 w 1143
the 14 w 1146
decree 1 w 1152
of 9 w 1154
Philocrates 1 w 1165
which 2 w 1171
lost 1 w 1175
us 11 w 1177
Amphipolis 1 w 1187
As 1 w 1190
for 3 w 1193
me 7 w 1195
men 4 w 1199
of 10 w 1201
Athens 2 w 1207
I 2 w 1209
did 2 w 1212
not 5 w 1215
venture 1 w 1222
to 16 w 1224
propose 2 w 1231
anything 1 w 1239
that 11 w 1243
was 8 w 1246
unconstitutional 1 w 1262
but 3 w 1266
it 9 w 1268
was 9 w 1271
not 6 w 1274
so 4 w 1276
to 17 w 1278
propose 3 w 1285
the 16 w 1288
direct 1 w 1294
contrary 1 w 1302
of 11 w 1304
Philocrates 2 w 1315
decree 2 w 1322
as 14 w 1325
I 3 w 1326
can 1 w 1329
prove 2 w 1334
to 18 w 1336
you 9 w 1339
For 2 w 1343
the 17 w 1346
decree 3 w 1352
of 12 w 1354
Philocrates 3 w 1365
through 1 w 1373
which 3 w 1378
you 10 w 1381
lost 2 w 1385
Amphipolis 2 w 1395
was 10 w 1399
itself 1 w 1405
contrary 2 w 1413
to 19 w 1415
the 18 w 1418
earlier 1 w 1425
decrees 1 w 1432
by 3 w 1434
which 4 w 1439
you 11 w 1442
claimed 1 w 1449
possession 1 w 1459
of 13 w 1461
that 12 w 1465
territory 1 w 1474
So 1 w 1477
it 12 w 1479
was 11 w 1482
this 1 w 1486
decree 5 w 1492
of 14 w 1494
Philocrates 4 w 1505
that 13 w 1509
was 12 w 1512
unconstitutional 2 w 1528
nor 1 w 1532
would 2 w 1537
it 14 w 1539
have 1 w 1543
been 3 w 1547
possible 1 w 1555
to 21 w 1557
draft 2 w 1562
a 112 w 1563
constitutional 3 w 1577
proposal 2 w 1585
in 19 w 1587
conformity 1 w 1597
with 3 w 1601
his 5 w 1604
unconstitutional 3 w 1620
decree 6 w 1626
By 1 w 1629
drafting 2 w 1637
mine 1 w 1641
to 22 w 1643
agree 1 w 1648
with 4 w 1652
the 19 w 1655
earlier 2 w 1662
decrees 2 w 1669
which 5 w 1675
were 1 w 1679
constitutional 5 w 1693
and 7 w 1696
which 6 w 1701
also 1 w 1705
kept 1 w 1709
your 3 w 1713
territory 2 w 1722
intact 1 w 1728
I 4 w 1730
both 2 w 1734
kept 2 w 1738
within 1 w 1744
the 20 w 1747
constitution 6 w 1759
and 8 w 1762
was 13 w 1765
able 1 w 1769
to 24 w 1771
convict 1 w 1778
Philip 8 w 1784
of 15 w 1786
trying 1 w 1792
to 25 w 1794
deceive 1 w 1801
you 13 w 1804
and 9 w 1807
of 16 w 1809
wishing 1 w 1816
not 7 w 1820
to 26 w 1822
amend 2 w 1827
the 21 w 1830
peace 3 w 1835
but 4 w 1839
to 27 w 1841
bring 1 w 1846
discredit 1 w 1855
on 27 w 1857
those 3 w 1862
who 5 w 1865
were 2 w 1869
pleading 1 w 1877
your 4 w 1881
cause 4 w 1886