Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Second Philippic

Second Philippic (20)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0014.tlg006.perseus-eng2:20
Refs {'start': {'reference': '20', 'human_reference': 'Section 20'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Can you not imagine, I said, addressing the Messenians, how annoyed the Olynthians would have been to hear a word said against Philip in the days when he was handing over to them Anthemus, to which all the former kings of Macedonia laid claim, when he was making them a present of Potidaea, expelling the Athenian settlers, and when he had taken upon himself the responsibility of a quarrel with us and had given them the territory of Potidaea for their own use? Do you imagine they expected to be treated as they have been, or would have believed anyone who suggested it?

Tokens

Can 1 w 3
you 1 w 6
not 1 w 9
imagine 1 w 16
I 1 w 18
said 1 w 22
addressing 1 w 33
the 1 w 36
Messenians 1 w 46
how 1 w 50
annoyed 1 w 57
the 2 w 60
Olynthians 1 w 70
would 1 w 75
have 1 w 79
been 1 w 83
to 1 w 85
hear 1 w 89
a 10 w 90
word 1 w 94
said 2 w 98
against 1 w 105
Philip 1 w 111
in 4 w 113
the 3 w 116
days 1 w 120
when 1 w 124
he 6 w 126
was 1 w 129
handing 1 w 136
over 1 w 140
to 2 w 142
them 1 w 146
Anthemus 1 w 154
to 3 w 157
which 1 w 162
all 1 w 165
the 6 w 168
former 1 w 174
kings 1 w 179
of 1 w 181
Macedonia 1 w 190
laid 1 w 194
claim 1 w 199
when 2 w 204
he 11 w 206
was 2 w 209
making 1 w 215
them 3 w 219
a 24 w 220
present 1 w 227
of 2 w 229
Potidaea 1 w 237
expelling 1 w 247
the 8 w 250
Athenian 1 w 258
settlers 1 w 266
and 2 w 270
when 3 w 274
he 16 w 276
had 1 w 279
taken 1 w 284
upon 1 w 288
himself 1 w 295
the 10 w 298
responsibility 1 w 312
of 3 w 314
a 31 w 315
quarrel 1 w 322
with 1 w 326
us 2 w 328
and 3 w 331
had 2 w 334
given 1 w 339
them 4 w 343
the 12 w 346
territory 1 w 355
of 4 w 357
Potidaea 2 w 365
for 2 w 368
their 1 w 373
own 1 w 376
use 1 w 379
Do 1 w 382
you 2 w 385
imagine 2 w 392
they 1 w 396
expected 1 w 404
to 5 w 406
be 2 w 408
treated 1 w 415
as 3 w 417
they 2 w 421
have 2 w 425
been 2 w 429
or 5 w 432
would 2 w 437
have 3 w 441
believed 1 w 449
anyone 1 w 455
who 1 w 458
suggested 1 w 467
it 4 w 469