Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Aegineticus

Aegineticus (41-45)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg006.perseus-eng2:41-45
Refs {'start': {'reference': '41', 'human_reference': 'Section 41'}, 'end': {'reference': '45', 'human_reference': 'Section 45'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

And it was my character and my affection for the two brothers that moved me to do all this and not any expectation of this trial; for I did not think that both would come to such an unhappy end that by dying without children they were going to oblige us to prove how each one of us had felt and acted toward them.

How this woman and myself conducted ourselves toward Thrasylochus and Sopolis you have, in the main heard; but perhaps they will have recourse to the one argument which remains to themthat Thrasyllus, the father of this woman, will feel that he is being dishonored (if the dead have any perception of happenings in this world)[*] when he sees his daughter being deprived of her fortune and me becoming the heir of what he had acquired.[*]

But I am of opinion that it is proper for us to speak here, not concerning those who died long ago, but of those who recently left their heritage. As to Thrasyllus, he left as possessors of his estate the persons of his choice; and it is only just, then, that to Thrasylochus also the same privilege should be granted by you, and that not this woman, but those whom he designated in his will, should become the successors to the inheritance. However, I do not believe that I need evade the judgement of Thrasyllus.

He would be, I think, the most harsh judge of all for her, if he knows how she has treated his children. If you should vote in accordance with the laws, he would be far from taking offense, but he would be far more incensed if he should see the testaments of his children annulled. If, for instance, Thrasylochus had given property to my family, they would have had reason to lay that up against him; as it is, he adopted into his own family, so that the plaintiffs have not received less than they gave.[*]

Apart from this, it is reasonable to suppose that Thrasyllus, more than anyone else, was friendly toward those whose claims are based upon a testamentary gift. For he himself learned his art from Polemaenetus the soothsayer, and received his fortune, not through family relationship but through merit; surely, therefore, he would not complain if a man who had acted honorably toward his children should be regarded as deserving of the same reward as himself.

Tokens

And 1 w 3
it 1 w 5
was 1 w 8
my 1 w 10
character 1 w 19
and 1 w 22
my 2 w 24
affection 1 w 33
for 1 w 36
the 1 w 39
two 1 w 42
brothers 1 w 50
that 1 w 54
moved 1 w 59
me 1 w 61
to 1 w 63
do 1 w 65
all 1 w 68
this 1 w 72
and 2 w 75
not 1 w 78
any 1 w 81
expectation 1 w 92
of 1 w 94
this 2 w 98
trial 1 w 103
for 2 w 107
I 1 w 108
did 1 w 111
not 2 w 114
think 1 w 119
that 2 w 123
both 1 w 127
would 1 w 132
come 1 w 136
to 2 w 138
such 1 w 142
an 4 w 144
unhappy 1 w 151
end 1 w 154
that 3 w 158
by 1 w 160
dying 1 w 165
without 1 w 172
children 1 w 180
they 1 w 184
were 1 w 188
going 1 w 193
to 3 w 195
oblige 1 w 201
us 1 w 203
to 4 w 205
prove 1 w 210
how 1 w 213
each 1 w 217
one 1 w 220
of 2 w 222
us 2 w 224
had 1 w 227
felt 1 w 231
and 3 w 234
acted 1 w 239
toward 1 w 245
them 1 w 249
How 1 w 253
this 3 w 257
woman 1 w 262
and 4 w 265
myself 1 w 271
conducted 1 w 280
ourselves 1 w 289
toward 2 w 295
Thrasylochus 1 w 307
and 5 w 310
Sopolis 1 w 317
you 1 w 320
have 1 w 324
in 4 w 327
the 5 w 330
main 1 w 334
heard 1 w 339
but 1 w 343
perhaps 1 w 350
they 2 w 354
will 1 w 358
have 2 w 362
recourse 1 w 370
to 7 w 372
the 7 w 375
one 2 w 378
argument 1 w 386
which 1 w 391
remains 1 w 398
to 8 w 400
them 2 w 404
that 4 w 409
Thrasyllus 1 w 419
the 9 w 423
father 1 w 429
of 3 w 431
this 4 w 435
woman 2 w 440
will 2 w 445
feel 1 w 449
that 5 w 453
he 12 w 455
is 6 w 457
being 1 w 462
dishonored 1 w 472
if 1 w 475
the 11 w 478
dead 1 w 482
have 3 w 486
any 2 w 489
perception 1 w 499
of 4 w 501
happenings 1 w 511
in 9 w 513
this 5 w 517
world 1 w 522
A 2 w 524
frequent 1 w 532
sentiment 1 w 541
in 10 w 543
Greek 1 w 548
literature 1 w 558
cf 1 w 561
Isoc 1 w 566
14 1 w 569
61 1 w 572
and 6 w 575
Isoc 2 w 579
9 1 w 581
2 1 w 583
when 1 w 588
he 15 w 590
sees 1 w 594
his 6 w 597
daughter 1 w 605
being 2 w 610
deprived 1 w 618
of 5 w 620
her 3 w 623
fortune 1 w 630
and 7 w 633
me 5 w 635
becoming 1 w 643
the 12 w 646
heir 1 w 650
of 6 w 652
what 1 w 656
he 19 w 658
had 2 w 661
acquired 1 w 669
This 1 w 674
passage 1 w 681
is 11 w 683
interesting 1 w 694
as 5 w 696
an 13 w 698
example 1 w 705
of 7 w 707
an 14 w 709
orator 1 w 715
s 37 w 717
anticipation 1 w 729
anticipatio 2 w 741
or 8 w 743
προκατάληψις 1 w 755
of 8 w 758
an 17 w 760
opponent 1 w 768
s 38 w 770
argument 2 w 778
But 1 w 782
I 4 w 783
am 2 w 785
of 9 w 787
opinion 1 w 794
that 6 w 798
it 4 w 800
is 12 w 802
proper 1 w 808
for 4 w 811
us 5 w 813
to 10 w 815
speak 1 w 820
here 1 w 824
not 3 w 828
concerning 1 w 838
those 1 w 843
who 1 w 846
died 1 w 850
long 1 w 854
ago 1 w 857
but 2 w 861
of 10 w 863
those 2 w 868
who 2 w 871
recently 1 w 879
left 1 w 883
their 1 w 888
heritage 1 w 896
As 1 w 899
to 11 w 901
Thrasyllus 2 w 911
he 23 w 914
left 2 w 918
as 7 w 920
possessors 1 w 930
of 11 w 932
his 8 w 935
estate 1 w 941
the 14 w 944
persons 1 w 951
of 12 w 953
his 9 w 956
choice 1 w 962
and 8 w 966
it 6 w 968
is 15 w 970
only 1 w 974
just 1 w 978
then 1 w 983
that 7 w 988
to 12 w 990
Thrasylochus 2 w 1002
also 1 w 1006
the 16 w 1009
same 1 w 1013
privilege 1 w 1022
should 1 w 1028
be 4 w 1030
granted 1 w 1037
by 2 w 1039
you 2 w 1042
and 9 w 1046
that 8 w 1050
not 4 w 1053
this 6 w 1057
woman 3 w 1062
but 3 w 1066
those 3 w 1071
whom 1 w 1075
he 27 w 1077
designated 1 w 1087
in 17 w 1089
his 11 w 1092
will 3 w 1096
should 2 w 1103
become 1 w 1109
the 17 w 1112
successors 1 w 1122
to 13 w 1124
the 18 w 1127
inheritance 1 w 1138
However 1 w 1146
I 5 w 1148
do 2 w 1150
not 5 w 1153
believe 1 w 1160
that 9 w 1164
I 6 w 1165
need 1 w 1169
evade 1 w 1174
the 19 w 1177
judgement 1 w 1186
of 13 w 1188
Thrasyllus 3 w 1198
He 1 w 1201
would 2 w 1206
be 7 w 1208
I 7 w 1210
think 2 w 1215
the 20 w 1219
most 1 w 1223
harsh 1 w 1228
judge 2 w 1233
of 14 w 1235
all 2 w 1238
for 5 w 1241
her 7 w 1244
if 2 w 1247
he 34 w 1249
knows 1 w 1254
how 2 w 1257
she 1 w 1260
has 1 w 1263
treated 1 w 1270
his 12 w 1273
children 2 w 1281
If 1 w 1284
you 3 w 1287
should 3 w 1293
vote 1 w 1297
in 20 w 1299
accordance 1 w 1309
with 2 w 1313
the 21 w 1316
laws 1 w 1320
he 37 w 1323
would 3 w 1328
be 8 w 1330
far 1 w 1333
from 1 w 1337
taking 1 w 1343
offense 1 w 1350
but 4 w 1354
he 38 w 1356
would 4 w 1361
be 9 w 1363
far 2 w 1366
more 1 w 1370
incensed 1 w 1378
if 3 w 1380
he 39 w 1382
should 4 w 1388
see 2 w 1391
the 22 w 1394
testaments 1 w 1404
of 16 w 1406
his 13 w 1409
children 3 w 1417
annulled 1 w 1425
If 2 w 1428
for 6 w 1432
instance 1 w 1440
Thrasylochus 3 w 1453
had 3 w 1456
given 1 w 1461
property 1 w 1469
to 14 w 1471
my 4 w 1473
family 1 w 1479
they 3 w 1484
would 5 w 1489
have 4 w 1493
had 4 w 1496
reason 1 w 1502
to 15 w 1504
lay 1 w 1507
that 10 w 1511
up 1 w 1513
against 1 w 1520
him 1 w 1523
as 13 w 1526
it 9 w 1528
is 20 w 1530
he 42 w 1533
adopted 1 w 1540
into 1 w 1544
his 14 w 1547
own 1 w 1550
family 2 w 1556
so 8 w 1559
that 11 w 1563
the 24 w 1566
plaintiffs 1 w 1576
have 5 w 1580
not 6 w 1583
received 1 w 1591
less 1 w 1595
than 1 w 1599
they 4 w 1603
gave 1 w 1607
i 97 w 1609
e 181 w 1611
all 3 w 1616
the 26 w 1619
property 2 w 1627
has 2 w 1630
been 1 w 1634
kept 1 w 1638
in 27 w 1640
the 27 w 1643
family 3 w 1649
since 1 w 1654
the 28 w 1657
continuity 1 w 1667
of 17 w 1669
the 29 w 1672
family 4 w 1678
had 5 w 1681
been 2 w 1685
assured 1 w 1692
by 3 w 1694
the 30 w 1697
adoption 1 w 1705
of 18 w 1707
the 31 w 1710
speaker 1 w 1717
Apart 1 w 1723
from 2 w 1727
this 7 w 1731
it 11 w 1734
is 23 w 1736
reasonable 1 w 1746
to 17 w 1748
suppose 1 w 1755
that 12 w 1759
Thrasyllus 4 w 1769
more 2 w 1774
than 2 w 1778
anyone 1 w 1784
else 1 w 1788
was 2 w 1792
friendly 1 w 1800
toward 3 w 1806
those 4 w 1811
whose 1 w 1816
claims 1 w 1822
are 1 w 1825
based 1 w 1830
upon 1 w 1834
a 135 w 1835
testamentary 1 w 1847
gift 1 w 1851
For 1 w 1855
he 51 w 1857
himself 1 w 1864
learned 1 w 1871
his 16 w 1874
art 2 w 1877
from 3 w 1881
Polemaenetus 1 w 1893
the 32 w 1896
soothsayer 1 w 1906
and 10 w 1910
received 2 w 1918
his 17 w 1921
fortune 2 w 1928
not 7 w 1932
through 1 w 1939
family 5 w 1945
relationship 1 w 1957
but 5 w 1960
through 2 w 1967
merit 1 w 1972
surely 1 w 1979
therefore 1 w 1989
he 54 w 1992
would 6 w 1997
not 8 w 2000
complain 1 w 2008
if 6 w 2010
a 146 w 2011
man 4 w 2014
who 5 w 2017
had 6 w 2020
acted 2 w 2025
honorably 1 w 2034
toward 4 w 2040
his 18 w 2043
children 4 w 2051
should 5 w 2057
be 12 w 2059
regarded 1 w 2067
as 20 w 2069
deserving 1 w 2078
of 19 w 2080
the 34 w 2083
same 2 w 2087
reward 1 w 2093
as 21 w 2095
himself 2 w 2102