Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Trapeziticus

Trapeziticus (48)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg005.perseus-eng2:48
Refs {'start': {'reference': '48', 'human_reference': 'Section 48'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

It is also right, men of the jury, that you should note the absurdity and the incredibility of the arguments which Pasion on each occasion undertook to present. For when my situation was such that, even if he acknowledged that he was defrauding me of my money, I could not have exacted the penalty from him, it is then that he accuses me of trying to make unjust claims; but when I had been declared innocent of the slanderous charges lodged with Satyrus and all thought that he would lose his suit, it is then that he says I renounced all claims against him. And yet how could anything be more illogical than this?

Tokens

It 1 w 2
is 1 w 4
also 1 w 8
right 1 w 13
men 1 w 17
of 1 w 19
the 1 w 22
jury 1 w 26
that 1 w 31
you 1 w 34
should 1 w 40
note 1 w 44
the 2 w 47
absurdity 1 w 56
and 1 w 59
the 3 w 62
incredibility 1 w 75
of 2 w 77
the 4 w 80
arguments 1 w 89
which 1 w 94
Pasion 1 w 100
on 2 w 102
each 1 w 106
occasion 1 w 114
undertook 1 w 123
to 2 w 125
present 1 w 132
For 1 w 136
when 1 w 140
my 1 w 142
situation 1 w 151
was 1 w 154
such 1 w 158
that 2 w 162
even 1 w 167
if 1 w 169
he 6 w 171
acknowledged 1 w 183
that 3 w 187
he 7 w 189
was 2 w 192
defrauding 1 w 202
me 3 w 204
of 3 w 206
my 2 w 208
money 1 w 213
I 2 w 215
could 1 w 220
not 2 w 223
have 1 w 227
exacted 1 w 234
the 5 w 237
penalty 1 w 244
from 1 w 248
him 1 w 251
it 4 w 254
is 2 w 256
then 1 w 260
that 4 w 264
he 10 w 266
accuses 1 w 273
me 4 w 275
of 4 w 277
trying 1 w 283
to 3 w 285
make 1 w 289
unjust 1 w 295
claims 1 w 301
but 1 w 305
when 2 w 309
I 3 w 310
had 1 w 313
been 1 w 317
declared 1 w 325
innocent 1 w 333
of 5 w 335
the 7 w 338
slanderous 1 w 348
charges 1 w 355
lodged 1 w 361
with 1 w 365
Satyrus 1 w 372
and 3 w 375
all 1 w 378
thought 1 w 385
that 5 w 389
he 13 w 391
would 1 w 396
lose 1 w 400
his 1 w 403
suit 1 w 407
it 7 w 410
is 4 w 412
then 2 w 416
that 6 w 420
he 15 w 422
says 1 w 426
I 4 w 427
renounced 1 w 436
all 2 w 439
claims 2 w 445
against 1 w 452
him 2 w 455
And 1 w 459
yet 1 w 462
how 1 w 465
could 2 w 470
anything 1 w 478
be 2 w 480
more 1 w 484
illogical 1 w 493
than 1 w 497
this 1 w 501