Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Against Callimachus

Against Callimachus (11-12)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0010.tlg002.perseus-eng2:11-12
Refs {'start': {'reference': '11', 'human_reference': 'Section 11'}, 'end': {'reference': '12', 'human_reference': 'Section 12'}}
Ancestors []
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

At first Callimachus kept his agreement, but later in complicity with Xenotimusthat falsifier of the laws, corrupter of our tribunals, vilifier of the authorities, and author of every evilhe brought suit against me for the sum of ten thousand drachmas. But when I brought forward in my defense a witness to show that the suit was not within the jurisdiction of the court by reason of the previous arbitration, he did not attack my witness

for he knew that, if he did not receive the fifth of the votes cast, he would be assessed a penalty of one-sixth of the amount demandedbut having won over the magistrate, he again brought the same suit, in the belief that he risked only his court deposit-fee. And since I was at a loss how to cope with my difficulties, I judged that it was best to make the hazard equal for us both[*] and to come before you. And these are the facts.

Tokens

At 1 w 2
first 1 w 7
Callimachus 1 w 18
kept 1 w 22
his 1 w 25
agreement 1 w 34
but 1 w 38
later 1 w 43
in 1 w 45
complicity 1 w 55
with 1 w 59
Xenotimus 1 w 68
that 1 w 73
falsifier 1 w 82
of 1 w 84
the 1 w 87
laws 1 w 91
corrupter 1 w 101
of 2 w 103
our 1 w 106
tribunals 1 w 115
vilifier 1 w 124
of 3 w 126
the 2 w 129
authorities 1 w 140
and 1 w 144
author 2 w 150
of 4 w 152
every 1 w 157
evil 1 w 161
he 3 w 164
brought 1 w 171
suit 1 w 175
against 1 w 182
me 2 w 184
for 1 w 187
the 3 w 190
sum 1 w 193
of 5 w 195
ten 1 w 198
thousand 1 w 206
drachmas 1 w 214
But 1 w 218
when 1 w 222
I 1 w 223
brought 2 w 230
forward 1 w 237
in 3 w 239
my 1 w 241
defense 1 w 248
a 18 w 249
witness 1 w 256
to 1 w 258
show 1 w 262
that 2 w 266
the 4 w 269
suit 2 w 273
was 1 w 276
not 2 w 279
within 1 w 285
the 5 w 288
jurisdiction 1 w 300
of 6 w 302
the 6 w 305
court 1 w 310
by 1 w 312
reason 1 w 318
of 7 w 320
the 7 w 323
previous 1 w 331
arbitration 1 w 342
he 10 w 345
did 1 w 348
not 3 w 351
attack 1 w 357
my 2 w 359
witness 2 w 366
for 3 w 370
he 11 w 372
knew 1 w 376
that 3 w 380
if 3 w 383
he 12 w 385
did 2 w 388
not 4 w 391
receive 1 w 398
the 8 w 401
fifth 1 w 406
of 8 w 408
the 9 w 411
votes 1 w 416
cast 1 w 420
he 15 w 423
would 1 w 428
be 1 w 430
assessed 1 w 438
a 29 w 439
penalty 1 w 446
of 9 w 448
one-sixth 1 w 457
of 10 w 459
the 10 w 462
amount 1 w 468
demanded 1 w 476
but 2 w 480
having 1 w 486
won 1 w 489
over 1 w 493
the 11 w 496
magistrate 1 w 506
he 18 w 509
again 2 w 514
brought 3 w 521
the 12 w 524
same 1 w 528
suit 3 w 532
in 7 w 535
the 13 w 538
belief 1 w 544
that 4 w 548
he 21 w 550
risked 1 w 556
only 1 w 560
his 2 w 563
court 2 w 568
deposit-fee 1 w 579
And 1 w 583
since 1 w 588
I 2 w 589
was 2 w 592
at 9 w 594
a 42 w 595
loss 1 w 599
how 2 w 602
to 2 w 604
cope 1 w 608
with 3 w 612
my 3 w 614
difficulties 1 w 626
I 3 w 628
judged 1 w 634
that 5 w 638
it 13 w 640
was 3 w 643
best 1 w 647
to 3 w 649
make 1 w 653
the 14 w 656
hazard 1 w 662
equal 1 w 667
for 4 w 670
us 5 w 672
both 1 w 676
See 1 w 679
Introduction 1 w 691
to 4 w 693
this 1 w 697
speech 1 w 703
and 4 w 707
to 5 w 709
come 1 w 713
before 1 w 719
you 1 w 722
And 2 w 726
these 1 w 731
are 1 w 734
the 16 w 737
facts 1 w 742