Scaife ATLAS

CTS Library / Tiberius and Caius Gracchus

Tiberius and Caius Gracchus (Caius.8.1-Caius.9.1)

urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0007.tlg052.perseus-eng1:Caius.8.1-Caius.9.1
Refs {'start': {'reference': 'Caius.8.1', 'human_reference': 'Book Caius Chapter 8 Section 1'}, 'end': {'reference': 'Caius.9.1', 'human_reference': 'Book Caius Chapter 9 Section 1'}}
Ancestors [{'reference': 'Caius'}, {'reference': 'Caius.8'}]
Children []
prev
plain textXML
next

Since the people extolled him for all these services and were ready to show him any token whatsoever of their good will, he said to them once in a public harangue that he was going to ask a favour of them, which, if granted, he should value supremely, but if it were refused, he should find no fault with them. This utterance was thought to be a request for a consulship, and led everybody to expect that he would sue for a consulship and a tribuneship at the same time.

But when the consular elections were at hand and everybody was on the tip-toe of expectation, He was seen leading Caius Fannius down into the Campus Martius and joining in the canvass for him along with his friends. This turned the tide strongly in favour of Fannius. So Fannius was elected consul, and Caius tribune for the second time, though he was not a candidate and did not canvass for the office; but the people were eager to have it so.

However, he soon saw that the senate was hostile to him out and out, and that the good will of Fannius towards him had lost its edge, and therefore again began to attach the multitude to himself by other laws, proposing to send colonies to Tarentum and Capua, and inviting the Latins to a participation in the Roman franchise. But the senate, fearing that Gracchus would become altogether invincible, made a new and unusual attempt to divert the people from him; they vied with him, that is, in courting the favour of the people, and granted their wishes contrary to the best interests of the state.

For one of the colleagues of Caius was Livius Drusus, a man who was not inferior to any Roman either in birth or rearing, while in character, eloquence, and wealth he could vie with those who were most honoured and influential in consequence of these advantages. To this man, accordingly, the nobles had recourse, and invited him to attack Caius and league himself with them against him, not resorting to violence or coming into collision with the people, but administering his office to please them and making them concessions where it would have been honourable to incur their hatred.

Livius, accordingly, put his influence as tribune at the service of the senate to this end, and drew up laws which aimed at what was neither honourable nor advantageous; nay, he had the emulous eagerness of the rival demagogues of comedy to achieve one thing, namely, to surpass Caius in pleasing and gratifying the people.[*] In this way the senate showed most plainly that it was not displeased with the public measures of Caius, but rather was desirous by all means to humble or destroy the man himself.

Tokens

Since 1 w 5
the 1 w 8
people 1 w 14
extolled 1 w 22
him 1 w 25
for 1 w 28
all 1 w 31
these 1 w 36
services 1 w 44
and 1 w 47
were 1 w 51
ready 1 w 56
to 2 w 58
show 1 w 62
him 2 w 65
any 1 w 68
token 1 w 73
whatsoever 1 w 83
of 1 w 85
their 1 w 90
good 1 w 94
will 1 w 98
he 4 w 101
said 1 w 105
to 4 w 107
them 1 w 111
once 1 w 115
in 2 w 117
a 7 w 118
public 1 w 124
harangue 1 w 132
that 1 w 136
he 6 w 138
was 1 w 141
going 1 w 146
to 5 w 148
ask 1 w 151
a 13 w 152
favour 1 w 158
of 2 w 160
them 2 w 164
which 1 w 170
if 1 w 173
granted 1 w 180
he 8 w 183
should 1 w 189
value 1 w 194
supremely 1 w 203
but 1 w 207
if 2 w 209
it 1 w 211
were 2 w 215
refused 1 w 222
he 9 w 225
should 2 w 231
find 1 w 235
no 1 w 237
fault 1 w 242
with 1 w 246
them 3 w 250
This 1 w 255
utterance 1 w 264
was 2 w 267
thought 1 w 274
to 6 w 276
be 1 w 278
a 20 w 279
request 1 w 286
for 2 w 289
a 21 w 290
consulship 1 w 300
and 2 w 304
led 2 w 307
everybody 1 w 316
to 7 w 318
expect 1 w 324
that 2 w 328
he 11 w 330
would 1 w 335
sue 1 w 338
for 3 w 341
a 24 w 342
consulship 2 w 352
and 3 w 355
a 26 w 356
tribuneship 1 w 367
at 4 w 369
the 7 w 372
same 1 w 376
time 1 w 380
But 1 w 384
when 1 w 388
the 8 w 391
consular 1 w 399
elections 1 w 408
were 3 w 412
at 5 w 414
hand 1 w 418
and 5 w 421
everybody 2 w 430
was 3 w 433
on 6 w 435
the 9 w 438
tip-toe 1 w 445
of 3 w 447
expectation 1 w 458
He 1 w 461
was 4 w 464
seen 1 w 468
leading 1 w 475
Caius 1 w 480
Fannius 1 w 487
down 1 w 491
into 1 w 495
the 10 w 498
Campus 1 w 504
Martius 1 w 511
and 6 w 514
joining 1 w 521
in 9 w 523
the 11 w 526
canvass 1 w 533
for 4 w 536
him 3 w 539
along 1 w 544
with 2 w 548
his 2 w 551
friends 1 w 558
This 2 w 563
turned 1 w 569
the 12 w 572
tide 1 w 576
strongly 1 w 584
in 10 w 586
favour 2 w 592
of 4 w 594
Fannius 2 w 601
So 1 w 604
Fannius 3 w 611
was 5 w 614
elected 1 w 621
consul 4 w 627
and 7 w 631
Caius 2 w 636
tribune 2 w 643
for 5 w 646
the 13 w 649
second 1 w 655
time 2 w 659
though 2 w 666
he 20 w 668
was 6 w 671
not 1 w 674
a 52 w 675
candidate 1 w 684
and 9 w 687
did 2 w 690
not 2 w 693
canvass 2 w 700
for 6 w 703
the 14 w 706
office 1 w 712
but 2 w 716
the 15 w 719
people 2 w 725
were 4 w 729
eager 1 w 734
to 10 w 736
have 1 w 740
it 4 w 742
so 2 w 744
However 1 w 752
he 23 w 755
soon 1 w 759
saw 1 w 762
that 3 w 766
the 16 w 769
senate 1 w 775
was 7 w 778
hostile 1 w 785
to 11 w 787
him 4 w 790
out 1 w 793
and 10 w 796
out 2 w 799
and 11 w 803
that 4 w 807
the 17 w 810
good 2 w 814
will 2 w 818
of 6 w 820
Fannius 4 w 827
towards 1 w 834
him 5 w 837
had 1 w 840
lost 1 w 844
its 1 w 847
edge 1 w 851
and 12 w 855
therefore 1 w 864
again 1 w 869
began 1 w 874
to 13 w 876
attach 1 w 882
the 19 w 885
multitude 1 w 894
to 14 w 896
himself 1 w 903
by 1 w 905
other 1 w 910
laws 1 w 914
proposing 1 w 924
to 15 w 926
send 1 w 930
colonies 1 w 938
to 16 w 940
Tarentum 1 w 948
and 13 w 951
Capua 1 w 956
and 14 w 960
inviting 1 w 968
the 21 w 971
Latins 1 w 977
to 17 w 979
a 83 w 980
participation 1 w 993
in 16 w 995
the 22 w 998
Roman 1 w 1003
franchise 1 w 1012
But 2 w 1016
the 23 w 1019
senate 2 w 1025
fearing 1 w 1033
that 5 w 1037
Gracchus 1 w 1045
would 2 w 1050
become 1 w 1056
altogether 1 w 1066
invincible 1 w 1076
made 1 w 1081
a 94 w 1082
new 1 w 1085
and 15 w 1088
unusual 1 w 1095
attempt 1 w 1102
to 19 w 1104
divert 1 w 1110
the 25 w 1113
people 3 w 1119
from 1 w 1123
him 7 w 1126
they 1 w 1131
vied 1 w 1135
with 3 w 1139
him 8 w 1142
that 6 w 1147
is 5 w 1149
in 20 w 1152
courting 1 w 1160
the 27 w 1163
favour 3 w 1169
of 7 w 1171
the 28 w 1174
people 4 w 1180
and 16 w 1184
granted 2 w 1191
their 2 w 1196
wishes 1 w 1202
contrary 1 w 1210
to 20 w 1212
the 30 w 1215
best 1 w 1219
interests 1 w 1228
of 8 w 1230
the 31 w 1233
state 1 w 1238
For 1 w 1242
one 1 w 1245
of 9 w 1247
the 32 w 1250
colleagues 1 w 1260
of 10 w 1262
Caius 3 w 1267
was 8 w 1270
Livius 1 w 1276
Drusus 1 w 1282
a 107 w 1284
man 2 w 1287
who 1 w 1290
was 9 w 1293
not 3 w 1296
inferior 1 w 1304
to 21 w 1306
any 2 w 1309
Roman 2 w 1314
either 1 w 1320
in 24 w 1322
birth 1 w 1327
or 10 w 1329
rearing 1 w 1336
while 1 w 1342
in 26 w 1344
character 1 w 1353
eloquence 1 w 1363
and 17 w 1367
wealth 1 w 1373
he 43 w 1375
could 1 w 1380
vie 2 w 1383
with 4 w 1387
those 1 w 1392
who 2 w 1395
were 5 w 1399
most 1 w 1403
honoured 1 w 1411
and 18 w 1414
influential 1 w 1425
in 28 w 1427
consequence 1 w 1438
of 11 w 1440
these 2 w 1445
advantages 1 w 1455
To 1 w 1458
this 1 w 1462
man 4 w 1465
accordingly 1 w 1477
the 35 w 1481
nobles 1 w 1487
had 2 w 1490
recourse 1 w 1498
and 19 w 1502
invited 1 w 1509
him 9 w 1512
to 22 w 1514
attack 1 w 1520
Caius 4 w 1525
and 20 w 1528
league 2 w 1534
himself 2 w 1541
with 5 w 1545
them 4 w 1549
against 1 w 1556
him 11 w 1559
not 4 w 1563
resorting 1 w 1572
to 23 w 1574
violence 1 w 1582
or 13 w 1584
coming 1 w 1590
into 2 w 1594
collision 1 w 1603
with 6 w 1607
the 37 w 1610
people 5 w 1616
but 3 w 1620
administering 1 w 1633
his 6 w 1636
office 2 w 1642
to 25 w 1644
please 1 w 1650
them 5 w 1654
and 21 w 1657
making 1 w 1663
them 6 w 1667
concessions 1 w 1678
where 1 w 1683
it 14 w 1685
would 3 w 1690
have 2 w 1694
been 1 w 1698
honourable 1 w 1708
to 26 w 1710
incur 1 w 1715
their 3 w 1720
hatred 1 w 1726
Livius 2 w 1733
accordingly 2 w 1745
put 1 w 1749
his 7 w 1752
influence 1 w 1761
as 14 w 1763
tribune 3 w 1770
at 21 w 1772
the 41 w 1775
service 2 w 1782
of 13 w 1784
the 42 w 1787
senate 3 w 1793
to 27 w 1795
this 2 w 1799
end 3 w 1802
and 22 w 1806
drew 1 w 1810
up 2 w 1812
laws 2 w 1816
which 2 w 1821
aimed 1 w 1826
at 23 w 1828
what 2 w 1832
was 10 w 1835
neither 1 w 1842
honourable 2 w 1852
nor 1 w 1855
advantageous 1 w 1867
nay 1 w 1871
he 55 w 1874
had 3 w 1877
the 44 w 1880
emulous 1 w 1887
eagerness 1 w 1896
of 14 w 1898
the 45 w 1901
rival 1 w 1906
demagogues 1 w 1916
of 15 w 1918
comedy 1 w 1924
to 28 w 1926
achieve 1 w 1933
one 2 w 1936
thing 1 w 1941
namely 1 w 1948
to 29 w 1951
surpass 1 w 1958
Caius 5 w 1963
in 42 w 1965
pleasing 1 w 1973
and 23 w 1976
gratifying 1 w 1986
the 46 w 1989
people 6 w 1995
An 1 w 1998
allusion 1 w 2006
to 30 w 2008
the 47 w 2011
rival 2 w 2016
demagogues 2 w 2026
in 45 w 2028
the 48 w 2031
Knights 1 w 2038
of 16 w 2040
Aristophanes 1 w 2052
In 1 w 2055
this 3 w 2059
way 1 w 2062
the 49 w 2065
senate 4 w 2071
showed 1 w 2077
most 2 w 2081
plainly 1 w 2088
that 7 w 2092
it 16 w 2094
was 11 w 2097
not 5 w 2100
displeased 1 w 2110
with 7 w 2114
the 50 w 2117
public 2 w 2123
measures 1 w 2131
of 17 w 2133
Caius 6 w 2138
but 4 w 2142
rather 1 w 2148
was 12 w 2151
desirous 1 w 2159
by 2 w 2161
all 3 w 2164
means 1 w 2169
to 32 w 2171
humble 1 w 2177
or 16 w 2179
destroy 1 w 2186
the 52 w 2189
man 5 w 2192
himself 3 w 2199