<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div xml:lang="eng" type="translation" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1348.abo021.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" n="6" subtype="chapter"><p>From that time he constantly acted as colleague with his father, and, indeed, as
					regent of the empire. He triumphed<note anchored="true">The joint triumph of
						Vespasian and Titus, which was celebrated A. U. C. 824, is fully described
						by Josephus, De Bell. Jud. vii. 24. It is commemorated by the triumphal
						monument called the Arch of Titus, erected by the senate and people of Rome
						after his death, and still standing at the foot of the Palatine Hill, on the
						road leading from the Colosseum to the Forum, and is one of the most
						beautiful as well as the most interesting models of Roman art. It consists
						of four stories of the three orders of architecture, the Corinthian being
						repeated in the two highest. Some of the bas-reliefs, still in good
						preservation, represent the table of the shew-bread, the seven-branched
						golden candlestick, the vessel of incense, and the silver-trumpets, which
						were taken by Titus from the Temple at Jerusalem, and, with the book of the
						law, the veil of the temple, and other spoils, were carried in the triumph.
						The fate of these sacred relics is rather interesting. Josephus says, that
						the veil and books of the law were deposited in the Palatium, and the rest
						of the spoils in the Temple of Peace. When that was burnt, in the reign of
						Commodus, these treasures were saved, and they were afterwards carried off
						by Genseric to Africa. Belisarius recovered them, and brought them to
						Constantinople, <date when="0520">A. D. 520</date>. Procopius informs us,
						that a Jew, who saw them, told an acquaintance of the emperor that it would
						not be advisable to carry them to the palace at Constantinople, as they
						could not remain anywhere else, but where Solomon had placed them. This, he
						said, was the reason why Genseric had taken the Palace at Rome, and the
						Roman army had in turn taken that of the Vandal kings. Upon this, the
						emperor was so alarmed. that he sent the whole of them to the Christian
						churches at Jerusalem. </note>with his father, bore jointly with him the
					office of censor;<note anchored="true">A.U.C. 825</note> and was, besides, his
					colleague not only in the tribunitian authority,<note anchored="true">A.U.C.
						824</note> but in seven consulships.<note anchored="true">A. U. C. 823, 825,
						827-830, 832. </note> Taking upon himself the care and inspection of
					all'offices, he dictated letters, wrote proclamations in his father's name, and
					pronounced his speeches in the senate in place of the quaestor. He likewise
					assumed the command of the pretorian guards, although no one but a Roman knight
					had ever before been their prefect. In this he conducted himself with great
					haughtiness and violence, taking off without scruple or delay all those he had
					most reason to suspect, after he had secretly sent his emissaries into the
					theatres and camp, to demand, as if by general consent, that the suspected
					persons should be delivered up to punishment. Among these, he invited to supper
					A. Cacina, a man of consular rank, whom he ordered to be stabbed at his
					departure, immediately after he had gone out of the room. To this act, indeed,
					he was provoked by an imminent danger; for he had discovered a writing under the
					hand of Cecina, containing an account of a plot hatched among the soldiers. By
					these acts, though he provided for his future security, yet for the present he
					so much incurred the hatred of the people, that scarcely ever any one came to
					the empire with a more odious character, or more universally disliked.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="7" subtype="chapter"><p>Besides his cruelty, he lay under the suspicion of giving way to habits of
					luxury, as he often prolonged his revels till midnight with the most riotous of
					his acquaintance. Nor was he unsuspected of lewdness, and his well-known
					attachment to queen Berenice,<note anchored="true">Berenice, whose name is
						written by our author and others Beronice, was daughter of Agrippa the
						Great, who was by Aristobulus, grandson of Herod the Great. Having been
						contracted to Mark, son of Alexander Lysimachus, he died before their union,
						and Agrippa married her to Herod, Mark's brother, for whom he had obtained
						from the emperor Claudius the kingdom of Chalcis. Herod also dying,
						Berenice, then a widow, lived with her brother, Agrippa, and was suspected
						of an incestuous intercourse with him. It was at this time that, on their
						way to the imperial court at Rome, they paid a visit to Festus, at Casarea,
						and were present when St. Paul answered his accusers so eloquently before
						the tribunal of the governor. Her fascinations were so great, that, to
						shield herself from the charge of incest, she prevailed on Polemon, king of
						Cilicia, to submit to be circumcised, become a Jew, and marry her. That
						union also proving unfortunate, she appears to have returned to Jerusalem,
						and having attracted Vespasian by magnificent gifts, and the young Titus by
						her extraordinary beauty, she followed them to Rome, after the termination
						of the Jewish war, and had apartments in the palace, where she lived with
						Titus, "to all appearance, as his wife," as Xiphilinus informs us; and there
						seems no doubt that he would have married her, but for the strong prejudices
						of the Romans against foreign alliances. Suetonius tells us with what pain
						they separated. </note> who received from him, as it is reported, a promise
					of marriage. He was supposed, besides, to be of a rapacious disposition; for it
					is certain, that, in causes which came before his father, he used to offer his
					interest for sale, and take bribes. In short, people publicly expressed an
					unfavourable opinion of him, and said he would prove another Nero. This
					prejudice, however, turned out in the end to his advantage, and enhanced his
					praises to the highest pitch when he was found to possess no vicious
					propensities, but, on the contrary, the noblest virtues. His entertainments were
					agreeable rather than extravagant: and he surrounded himself with such excellent
					friends, that the succeeding princes adopted them as most serviceable to
					themselves and the state. He immediately sent away Berenice from the city, much
					against both their inclinations. Some of his old eunuchs, though such
					accomplished dancers, that they bore an uncontrollable sway upon the stage, he
					was so far from treating with any extraordinary kindness, that he would not so
					much as witness their performances in the crowded theatre. He violated no
					private right; and if ever man refrained from injustice, he did; nay, he would
					not accept of the allowable and customary offerings. Yet, in munificence, he was
					inferior to none of the princes before him. Having dedicated his amphitheatre,
						<note anchored="true">The Colosseum: it had been four years in building. See
						VESPAS. c. ix. </note> and built some warm baths<note anchored="true">The
						Baths of Titus stood on the Esquiline Hill, on part of the ground which had
						been the gardens of Maecenas. Considerable remains of them are still found
						among the vineyards; vaulted chambers of vast dimensions, some of which were
						decorated with arabesque paintings, still in good preservation. Titus
						appears to have erected a palace for himself adjoining; for the Laocoon,
						which is mentioned by Pliny as standing in this palace, was found in the
						neighbouring ruins.</note> close by it with great expedition, he entertained
					the people with most magnificent spectacles. He likewise exhibited a naval fight
					in the old Naumachia, besides a combat of gladiators; and in one day brought
					into the theatre five thousand wild beasts of all kinds.<note anchored="true">If
						the statements were not well attested, we might be incredulous as to the
						number of wild beasts collected for the spectacles to which the people of
						Rome were so passionately devoted. The earliest account we have of such an
						exhibition, was A. U. C. 502, when one hundred and forty-two elephants,
						taken in Sicily, were produced. Pliny. who gives this information, states
						that lions first appeared in any number, A. U. C. 652; but these were
						probably not turned loose. In 661, Sylla, when he was praetor, brought
						forward one hundred. In 696, besides lions, elephants, and bears, one
						hundred and fifty panthers were shown for the first time. At the dedication
						of Pompey's Theatre, there was the greatest exhibition of beasts ever then
						known; including seventeen elephants, six hundred lions, which were killed
						in the course of five days, four hundred and ten panthers, c. A rhinoceros
						also appeared for the first time. This was A. U. c. 70I. The art of taming
						these beasts was carried to such perfection, that Mark Antony actually yoked
						them to his carriage. Julius Caesar, in his third dictatorship, A. U. c.
						708, showed a vast number of wild beasts, among which were four hundred
						lions and a cameleopard. A tiger was exhibited for the first time at the
						dedication of the Theatre of Marcellus, A. U. C. 743. It was kept in a cage.
						Claudius afterwards exhibited four together. The exhibition of Titus, at the
						dedication of the Colosseum, here mentioned by Suetonius, seems to have been
						the largest ever made; Xiphilinus even adds to the number, and says, that
						including wild-boars, cranes and other animals, no less than nine thousand
						were killed. In the reigns of succeeding emperors, a new feature was given
						to these spectacles, the Circus being converted into a temporary forest, by
						planting large trees, in which wild animals were turned loose, and the
						people were allowed to enter the wood and take what they pleased. In this
						instance, the game consisted principally of beasts of chase; and, on one
						occasion, one thousand stags, as many of the ibex, wild sheep (moufflons
						from Sardinia?), and other grazing animals, besides one thousand wild boars,
						and as many ostriches, were turned loose by the emperor Gordian.</note></p></div><div type="textpart" n="8" subtype="chapter"><p>He was by nature extremely benevolent; for whereas all the emperors after
					Tiberius, according to the example he had set them, would not admit the grants
					made by former princes to be valid, unless they received their own sanction, he
					confirmed them all by one general edict, without waiting for any applications
					respecting them. Of all who petitioned for any favour, he sent none away without
					hopes. And when his ministers represented to him that he promised more than he
					could perform, he replied, " No one ought to go away downcast from an audience
					with his prince." Once at supper, reflecting that he had done nothing for any
					that day, he broke out into that memorable and justly-admired saying, "My
					friends, I have lost a day."<note anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="lat">"Diem
							perdidi."</foreign> This memorable speech is recorded by several other
						historians, and praised by Eusebius in his Chronicles. </note> More
					particularly, he treated the people on all occasions with so much courtesy,
					that, on his presenting them with a show of gladiators, he declared, "He should
					manage it, not according to his own fancy, but that of the spectators," and did
					accordingly. He denied them nothing, and very frankly encouraged them to ask
					what they pleased. Espousing the cause of the Thracian party among the
					gladiators, he frequently joined in the popular demonstrations in their favour,
					but without compromising his dignity or doing injustice. To omit no opportunity
					of acquiring popularity, he sometimes made use himself of the baths he had
					erected, without excluding the common people. There happened in his reign some
					dreadful accidents; an enrption of mount Vesuvius, <note anchored="true">A. U.
						C. 832, <date when="0079">A. D. 79</date>. It is hardly necessary to refer to
						the well-known Epistles of Pliny the younger, vi. 16 and 20, giving an
						account of the first eruption of Vesuvius, in which Pliny, the historian,
						perished. And see hereafter, p. 499. </note> in Campania, and a fire in
					Rome, which continued three days and three nights;<note anchored="true">The
						great fire at Rome happened in the second year of the reign of Titus. It
						consumed a large portion of the city, and among the public buildings
						destroyed were the temples of Serapis and Isis, that of Neptune, the baths
						of Agrippa, the Septa, the theatres of Balbus and Pompey, the buildings and
						library of Augustus on the Palatine, and the temple of Jupiter in the
						Capitol. </note> besides a plague, such as was scarcely ever known before.
					Amidst these many great disasters, he not only manifested the concern which
					might be expected from a prince, but even the affection of a father, for his
					people; one while comforting them by his proclamations, and another while
					relieving them to the utmost of his power. He chose by lot, from among the men
					of consular rank, commissioners for repairing the losses in Campania. The
					estates of those who had perished by the eruption of Vesuvius, and who had left
					no heirs, he applied to the repair of the ruined cities. With regard to the
					public buildings destroyed by fire in the City, he declared that nobody should
					be a loser but himself. Accordingly, he applied all the ornaments of his palaces
					to the decoration of the temples, and purposes of public utility, and appointed
					several men of the equestrian order to superintend the work. For the relief of
					the people during the plague, he employed, in the way of sacrifice and medicine,
					all means both human and divine. Amongst the calamities of the times, were
					informers and their agents; a tribe of miscreants who had grown up under the
					licence of former reigns. These he frequently ordered to be scourged or beaten
					with sticks in the forum, and then, after he had obliged them to pass through
					the amphitheatre as a public spectacle, commanded them to be sold for slaves, or
					else banished them to some rocky islands. And to discourage such practices for
					the future, amongst other things, he prohibited actions to be successively
					brought under different laws for the same cause, or the state of affairs of
					deceased persons to be inquired into after a certain number of years.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="9" subtype="chapter"><p>Having declared that he accepted the office of Pontifex Maximus for the purpose
					of preserving his hands undefiled, he faithfully adhered to his promise. For
					after that time he was neither directly nor indirectly concerned in the death of
					any person, though he sometimes was justly irritated. He swore "that he would
					perish himself rather than prove the destruction of any man." Two men of
					patrician rank being convicted of aspiring to the empire, he only advised them
					to desist, saying, "that the sovereign power was disposed of by fate," and
					promised them, that if there was any thing else they desired of him, he would
					grant it. He also immediately sent messengers to the mother of one of them, who
					was at a great distance, and in deep anxiety about her son, to assure her of his
					safety. Nay, he not only invited them to sup with him, but next day, at a show
					of gladiators, purposely placed them close by him; and handed to them the arms
					of the combatants for their inspection. It is said likewise, that having had
					their nativities cast, he assured them, " that a great calamity was impending on
					both of them, but from another hand, and not from his." Though his brother was
					continually plotting against him, almost openly stirring up the armies to
					rebellion, and contriving to get away, yet he could not endure to put him to
					death, or to banish him from his presence; nor did he treat him with less
					respect than before. But from his first accession to the empire, he constantly
					declared him his partner in it, and that he should be his successor; begging of
					him sometimes in private, with tears in his eyes, "to return the affection he
					had for him."</p></div><div type="textpart" n="10" subtype="chapter"><p>Amidst all these favourable circumstances, he was cut off by an untimely death,
					more to the loss of mankind than himself. At the close of the public spectacles,
					he wept bitterly in the presence of the people, and then retired into the Sabine
					country, <note anchored="true">See VESPASIAN cc. i. and xxiv. The love of this
						emperor and his son Titus for the rural retirement of their paternal acres
						in the Sabine country, forms a striking contrast to the vicious attachment
						of such tyrants as Tiberius and Caligula for the luxurious scenes of Baiae,
						or the libidinous orgies of Capri. </note> rather melancholy, because a
					victim had made its escape while he was sacrificing, and loud thunder had been
					heard while the atmosphere was serene. At the first resting-place on the road,
					he was seized with a fever, and being carried forward in a litter, they say that
					he drew back the curtains, and looked up to heaven, complaining heavily, " that
					his life was taken from him, though he had done nothing to deserve it; for there
					was no action of his that he had occasion to repent of, but one." What that was,
					he neither disclosed himself, nor is it easy for us to conjecture. Some imagine
					that he alluded to the connection which he had formerly had with his brothers
					wife. But Domitia solemnly denied it on oath; which she would never have done,
					had there been any truth in the report; nay, she would certainly have gloried in
					it, as she was forward enough to boast of all her scandalous intrigues.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>