<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div xml:lang="eng" type="translation" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi1348.abo011.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" n="76" subtype="chapter"><p>His other words and actions, however, so far outweigh all his good qualities,
					that it is thought he abused his power, and was justly cut off. For he not only
					obtained excessive honours, such as the consulship every year, the dictatorship
					for life, and the censorship, but also the title of emperor, <note anchored="true">The title of emperor was not new in Roman history; 1. It was
						sometimes given by the acclamations of the soldiers to those who commanded
						them. 2. It was synonymous with conqueror, and the troops hailed him by that
						title after a victory. In both these cases it was merely titular, and not
						permanent, and was generally written after the proper name, as <foreign xml:lang="lat">Cicero imperator</foreign>, <foreign xml:lang="lat">Lentulo
							imperatore</foreign>. 3. It assumed a permanent and royal character
						first in the person of Julius Caesar, and was then generally prefixed to the
						emperor's name in inscriptions, as <foreign xml:lang="lat">IMP. Caesar.
							DIVI.</foreign> etc.</note> and the surname of FATHER OF HIS COUNTRY,
						<note anchored="true">Cicero was the first who received the honour of being
						called <foreign xml:lang="lat">Pater patriae.</foreign>
					</note> besides having his statue amongst the kings, <note anchored="true">Statues were placed in the Capitol of each of the seven kings of <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>, to which an eighth was added in
						honour of Brutus, who expelled the last. The statue of Julius Caesar was
						afterwards raised near them. </note> and a lofty couch in the theatre. He
					even suffered some honours to be decreed to him, which were unbefitting the most
					exalted of mankind: such as a gilded chair of state in the senate-house and on
					his tribunal, a consecrated chariot, and banners in the Circensian procession,
					temples, altars, statues among the gods, a bed of state in the temples, a
					priest, and a college of priests dedicated to himself, like those of Pan; and
					that one of the months should be called by his name. There were, indeed, no
					honours which he did not either assume himself, or grant to others, at his will
					and pleasure. In his third and fourth consulship, he used only the title of the
					office, being content with the power of dictator, which was conferred upon him
					with the consulship; and in both years he substituted other consuls in his room,
					during the three last months; so that in the intervals he held no assemblies of
					the people, for the election of magistrates, excepting only tribunes and ediles
					of the people; and appointed officers, under the name of praefects, instead of
					praetors, to administer the affairs of the city during his absence. The office
					of consul having become vacant, by the sudden death of one of the consuls the
					day before the calends of January [the 1st Jan.], he conferred it on a person
					who requested it of him, for a few hours. Assuming the same licence, and
					regardless of the customs of his country, he appointed magistrates to hold their
					offices for terms of years. He granted the insignia of the consular dignity to
					ten persons of praetorian rank. He admitted into the senate some men who had
					made free of the city, and even natives of Gaul, who were semi-barbarians. He
					likewise appointed to the management of the mint, and the public revenue of the
					state, some servants of his own household; and entrusted the command of three
					legions, which he left at <placeName key="perseus,Alexandria">Alexandria</placeName>, to an old catamite of his, the son of his freed-man
					Rufinus.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="77" subtype="chapter"><p>He was guilty of the same extravagance in the language he publicly used, as Titus
					Ampius informs us; according to whom he said, "The republic is nothing but a
					name, without substance or reality. Sylla was an ignorant fellow to abdicate the
					dictatorship. Men ought to consider what is becoming when they talk with me, and
					look upon what I say as a law." To such a pitch of arrogance did he proceed,
					that when a soothsayer announced to him the unfavourable omen, that the entrails
					of a victim offered for sacrifice were without a heart, he said, "The entrails
					will be more favourable when I please; and it ought not to be regarded as a
					prodigy that a beast should be found wanting a heart."</p></div><div type="textpart" n="78" subtype="chapter"><p>But what brought upon him the greatest odium, and was thought an unpardonable
					insult, was his receiving the whole body of the conscript fathers sitting,
					before the temple of Venus Genitrix, when they waited upon him with a number of
					decrees, conferring on him the highest dignities. Some say that, on his
					attempting to rise, he was held down by Cornelius Balbus; others, that he did
					not attempt to rise at all, but frowned on Caius Trebatius, who suggested to him
					that he should stand up to receive the senate. This behaviour appeared the more
					intolerable in him, because, when one of the tribunes of the people, Pontius
						<placeName key="tgn,7004067">Aquila</placeName>, would not rise up to him,
					as he passed by the tribunes' seat during his triumph, he was so much offended,
					that he cried out, "Well then, you tribune, Aquila, oust me from the
					government." And for some days afterwards, he never promised a favour to any
					person, without this proviso, "if Pontus Aquila will give me leave."</p></div><div type="textpart" n="79" subtype="chapter"><p>To this extraordinary mark of contempt for the senate, he added another affront
					still more outrageous. For when, after the sacred rites of the Latin festival,
					he was returning home, amidst the immoderate and unusual acclamations of the
					people, a man in the crowd put a laurel crown, encircled with a white
						fillet,<note anchored="true">The white fillet was one of the insignia of
						royalty. Plutarch, on this occasion, uses the expression, <foreign xml:lang="grc">διαδήματι βασιλικῷ</foreign>, a royal diadem.
					</note> on one of his statues; upon which, the tribunes of the people, Epidius
					Marullus, and Caesetius Flavus ordered the fillet to be removed from the crown,
					and the man to be taken to prison. Caesar, being much concerned either that the
					idea of royalty had been suggested to so little purpose, or, as was said, that
					he was thus deprived of the merit of refusing it, reprimanded the tribunes very
					severely, and dismissed them from their office. From that day forward, he was
					never able to wipe off the scandal of affecting the name of king, although he
					replied to the populace when they saluted him by that title, "I am Caesar, and
					no king." And at the feast of the Lupercalia,<note anchored="true">The
						Lupercalia was a festival, celebrated in a place called the Lupercal, in the
						month of February, in honour of Pan. During the solemnity, the Luferci, or
						priests of that god, ran up and down the street naked, with only a girdle of
						goat's skin round their waist, and thongs of the same in their hands; with
						which they struck those they met, particularly married women, who were
						thence supposed to be rendered prolific. </note> when the consul Antony
					placed a crown upon his head in the rostra several times, he as often put it
					away, and sent it to the Capitol for <placeName key="tgn,1125260">Jupiter</placeName>, the Best and the Greatest. A report was very current,
					that he had a design of withdrawing to <placeName key="perseus,Alexandria">Alexandria</placeName> or <placeName key="tgn,7002329">Ilium</placeName>,
					whither he proposed to transfer the imperial power, to drain <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName> by new levies, and to leave the
					government of the city to be administered by his friends. To this report 'it was
					added, that in the next meeting of the senate, Lucius Cotta, one of the fifteen,
						<note anchored="true">Persons appointed to inspect and expound the Sibylline
						books. </note> would make a motion, that as there was in the Sibylline books
					a prophecy, that the Parthians would never be subdued but by a king, Caesar
					should have that title conferred upon him.</p></div><div type="textpart" n="80" subtype="chapter"><p>For this reason the conspirators precipitated the execution of their design,<note anchored="true">A.U.C. 709.</note> that they might not be obliged to give
					their assent to the proposal. Instead, therefore, of caballing any longer
					separately, in small parties, they now united their counsels; the people
					themselves being dissatisfied with the present state of affairs, both privately
					and publicly condemning the tyranny under which they lived, and calling on
					patriots to assert their cause against the usurper. Upon the admission of
					foreigners into the senate, a hand-bill was posted up in these words: "A good
					deed! let no one shew a new senator the way to the house." These verses were
					likewise currently repeated: <quote xml:lang="eng"><l>The Gauls he dragged in
							triumph through the town,</l><l>Caesar has brought into the senate-house, And changed their plaids<note anchored="true">See before, c. xxii.</note>for the patrician
							gown.</l></quote>
					<quote xml:lang="lat"><l>Gallos Caesar in triumphum ducit: iidem in curiam</l><l>Galli braccas deposuerunt, latum clavum sumpserunt.</l></quote> When
					Quintus Maximus, who had been his deputy in the consulship for the last three
					months, entered the theatre, and the lictor, according to custom, bid the people
					take notice who was coming, they all cried out, "He is no consul." After the
					removal of Cesetius and Marullus from their office, they were found to have a
					great many votes at the next election of consuls. Some one wrote under the
					statue of Lucius Brutus "Would you were now alive !" and under the statue of
					Caesar himself these lines: <quote xml:lang="eng"><l>Because he drove from
								<placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> the royal race,</l><l>Brutus was first made consul in their place.</l><l>This man, because he put the consuls down,</l><l>Has been rewarded with a royal crown.</l></quote>
					<quote xml:lang="lat"><l>Brutus, quia reges ejecit, consul primus factus est:</l><l>Hic, quia consules ejecit, rex postremo factus est.</l></quote> About
					sixty persons were engaged in the conspiracy against him, of whom Caius Cassius,
					and Marcus and Decimus Brutus were the chief. It was at first debated amongst
					them, whether they should attack him in the <placeName key="tgn,7006964">Campus
						Martius</placeName> when he was taking the votes of the tribes, or some bf
					them should throw him off the bridge. whilst others should be ready to stab him
					upon his fall; or else in the Via Sacra, or at the entrance of the theatre. But
					after public notice had been given by proclamation for the senate to assemble
					upon the ides of March [15th March], in the senate-house built by Pompey, they
					approved both of the time and place, as most fitting for their purpose.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>