<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0631.phi002.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="3"><p> Of these occupation us, however, civil and military offices,<note anchored="true" place="foot">III Civil and military offices] <quote xml:lang="lat">Magistratus et imperia.</quote> <cit><quote><foreign xml:lang="lat">"Illo vocabulo civilia, hoc militaria munera, significantur."</foreign></quote><bibl>Dietsch.</bibl></cit></note> <pb n="82"/>and all administration of public affairs, seem to me at the present time, by no means to be desired; for neither is honor conferred on merit, nor are those, who have gained power by unlawful means, the more secure or respected for it. To rule our country or subjects<note anchored="true" place="foot">To rule our country or subjects, etc.] <quote xml:lang="lat">Nam vi quidem regere patriam aut parents,</quote> etc. Cortius, Gerlach, Kritz, Dietsch, and Müller are unanimous in understanding <foreign xml:lang="lat">parentes</foreign> as the participle of the verb <foreign xml:lang="lat">parco.</foreign> That this is the sense, says Gerlach, is sufficiently proved by the conjunction <foreign xml:lang="lat">aut;</foreign> for if Sallust had meant <foreign xml:lang="lat">parents,</foreign> he would have used <foreign xml:lang="lat">ut;</foreign> and in this opinion Allen coincides. Doubtless, also, this sense of the word suits extremely well with the rest of the sentence, in which changes in government are mentioned. But Bernouf, with Crispinus, prefers to follow Aldus Manutius, who took the word in the other signification, supposing that Sallust borrowed the sentiment from Plato, who says in his Epistle <foreign xml:lang="lat">ad Dionis Propinquos:</foreign> <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πατέρα δὲ ἢ μητέρα ὀυχ ὅσιον ἡγοῦμαι προσβιύζεσθαι, μὴ νόσῳ παραφροσύνησ ἐχομένους. Βίαν δὲ πατρίδι πολιτέιασ μεταβολῆσ ηὴ προσφερειν, ὅταν ἄνευ φυγῶν, καὶ σφαγῆζ ἀνδρῶν, μὴ δυνατὸν ᾗ γίνεσθαι τὴν ἀριστὴν.</foreign> And he makes a similar observation in his Crito: <foreign xml:lang="grc">Πανταχοὖ ποιητέον, ὃ ἃν κελεύοι ἡ πόλισ τε, καὶ ἡ πατρὶς.</foreign> On which sentiments Cicero, ad Fam. i. 9, thus comments: <foreign xml:lang="lat">Id enim jubet idem ille Plato, quem ego auctorem vehementer sequor; tantum contender in republica quantum probare tuis civibus possis: vim neque parenti, neque patriœ afferre oportere.</foreign> There is also another passage in Cicero, Cat. i. 3, which seems to favor this sense of the word: <foreign xml:lang="lat">Si te parentes timerent atque odissent tui, neque eos ullâ ratione placare posses, ut opinor, ab eorum oculis aliquò concederes; nunc te patria, quœ communis est omnium nostrum parens odit ac metuit,</foreign> etc. Of the first passage cited from Plato, indeed, Sallust's words may seem to be almost a translation. Yet, as the majority of commentators have followed Cortius, I have also followed him. Sallust has the word in this sense in Jug., c. 102: <foreign xml:lang="lat">Parentes abunde habemus.</foreign> So Vell. Pat. ii. 108: <foreign xml:lang="lat">Principatis constans ex voluntate parentium.</foreign></note> by force, though we may have the ability, and may correct what is wrong, is yet an ungrateful undertaking; especially as all changes in the state lead to<note anchored="true" place="foot">Lead to] <quote xml:lang="lat">Portendant.</quote> <cit><quote>"<foreign xml:lang="lat">Portendere</foreign> in a pregnant sense, meaning not merely to indicate, but <foreign xml:lang="lat">quasi secum ferre,</foreign> to carry along with them."</quote><bibl>Kritzius.</bibl></cit></note> bloodshed, exile, and other evils of discord; while to struggle in ineffectual attempts, and to gain nothing, by wearisome exertions, but public hatred, is the extreme of madness; unless when a base and pernicious spirit, perchance, may prompt a man to sacrifice his honor and liberty to the power of a party.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="4"><p> Among other employments which are pursued by the intellect, the recording of past events is of pre-eminent utility; but of its merits I may, I think, be silent, since many have spoken of them, and since, if I were to praise my own occupation, I might be considered as presumptuously<note anchored="true" place="foot">IV. Presumptuously] <quote xml:lang="lat">Per insolentiam.</quote> The same as <foreign xml:lang="lat">insolenter,</foreign> though some refer it, not to Sallust, but to <foreign xml:lang="lat">quis existumet,</foreign> in the sense of strangely, i.e. foolishly or ignorantly. I follow Cortius's interpretation.</note> praising myself. <pb n="83"/>I believe, too, that there will be some, who, because I have resolved to live unconnected with political affairs, will apply to my arduous and useful labors the name of idleness; especially those who think it an important pursuit to court the people, and gain popularity by entertainments. But if such persons will consider at what periods I obtained office, what sort of men<note anchored="true" place="foot">At what periods I obtained office, what sort of men, etc.] <quote xml:lang="lat">Quibus ego tomporibus magistratus adeptus sum, et quales viri,</quote> etc. <cit><quote>"Sallust obtained the quæstorship a few years after the conspiracy of Catiline, about the time when the state was agitated by the disorders of Clodius and his party. He was tribune of the people,  A.U.C. 701, the year in which Clodius was killed by <placeName key="tgn,1013243">Milo</placeName>. He was prætor in 708, when Cæsar had made himself ruler. In the expression <foreign xml:lang="lat">quales viri</foreign>, etc., he alludes chiefly to Cato, who, when he stood for the prætorship, was unsuccessful."</quote><bibl>Bernouf.</bibl></cit> Kritzius defends <foreign xml:lang="lat">adeptus sum.</foreign></note> were then unable to obtain it, and what description of persons have subsequently entered the senate,<note anchored="true" place="foot">What description of persons have subsequently entered the senate] <cit><quote>"Cæsar chose the worthy and unworthy, as suited his own purposes, to be members of the senate."</quote><bibl>Bernouf.</bibl></cit></note> they will think, assuredly, that I have altered my sentiments rather from prudence than from indolence, and that more good will arise to the state from my retirement, than from the busy efforts of others.</p><p>I have often heard that Quintus Maximus,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Quintus Maximus] Quintus Fabius Maximus, of whom Ennius says, <quote xml:lang="lat">Unus qui nobis cunctando restituit rem; Non ponebat enim rumores ante salutem.</quote></note> Publius Scipio,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Publius Scipio] Scipio Africanus the Elder, the conqueror of <placeName key="tgn,2121348">Hannibal</placeName>. See c. 5.</note> and many other illustrious men of our country, were accustomed to observe, that, when they looked on the images of their ancestors, they felt their minds irresistibly excited to the pursuit of honor.<note anchored="true" place="foot">To the pursuit of honor] <quote xml:lang="lat">Ad vertutem.</quote> <foreign xml:lang="lat">Virtus</foreign> in the same sense as in <foreign xml:lang="lat">virtutis viâ,</foreign> c. 1.</note> Not, certainly, that the wax,<note anchored="true" place="foot">The wax] <quote xml:lang="lat">Ceram illam.</quote> The images or busts of their ancestors, which the nobility kept in the halls of their houses, were made of wax. See Plin. H. N. xxxv., 2.</note> or the shape, had any such influence; but, as they called to mind their forefathers' achievements, such a flame was kindled in the breasts of those eminent persons, as could not be extinguished till their own merit had equaled the fame and glory of their ancestors.</p><p>But, in the present state of manners, who is there, on the <pb n="84"/>contrary, that does not rather emulate his forefathers in riches and extravagance, than in virtue and labor? Even men of humble birth,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Men of humble birth] <quote xml:lang="lat">Homines novi.</quote> See Cat., c. 23.</note> who formerly used to surpass the nobility in merit, pursue power and honor rather by intrigue and dishonesty, than by honorable qualifications; as if the prætorship, consulate, and all other offices of the kind, were noble and dignified in themselves, and not to be estimated according to the worth of those who fill them.</p><p>But, in expressing my concern and regret at the manners of the state, I have proceeded with too great freedom, and at too great length. I now return to my subject.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="5"><p> I am about to relate the war which the Roman people carried on with Jugurtha, King of the Numidians; first, because it was great, sanguinary, and of varied fortune; and secondly, because then, for the first time, opposition was offered to the power of the nobility; a contest which threw every thing, religious and civil, into confusion,<note anchored="true" place="foot">V. Threw every thing, religious and civil into confusion] <quote xml:lang="lat">Divina et humana cuncta permiscuit.</quote> <cit><quote>"All things, both divine and human, were so changed, that their previous condition was entirely subverted."</quote><bibl>Dietsch.</bibl></cit></note> and was carried to such a height of madness, that nothing but war, and the devastation of <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>, could put an end to civil dissensions.<note anchored="true" place="foot">Civil dissensions] <quote xml:lang="lat">Studiis civilibus.</quote> This is the sense in which most commentators take <foreign xml:lang="lat">studia;</foreign> and if this be right, the whole phrase must be understood as I have rendered it. So Cortius; <foreign xml:lang="lat">"Ut non prius finirentur [studio civilia] nisi bello et vastitate Italiæ."</foreign> Sallust has <foreign xml:lang="lat">studia paratium,</foreign> Jug c. 42; and <placeName key="tgn,2083270">Gerlach</placeName> quotes from Cic. pro <placeName key="tgn,2054957">Marcell</placeName>. c. 10: "<foreign xml:lang="lat">Non enim consiliis solis et studiis, sed armis etiam et castris dissidebamus.</foreign>"</note> But before I fairly commence my narrative, I will take a review of a few preceding particulars, in order that the whole subject may be more clearly and distinctly understood.</p><p>In the second Punic war, in which <placeName key="tgn,2069580">Hannibal</placeName>, the leader of the Carthaginians, had weakened the power of <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName> more than any other enemy<note anchored="true" place="foot">More than any other enemy] <quote xml:lang="lat">Maximè.</quote></note> since the Roman name became great,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Since the Roman name became great] <quote xml:lang="lat">Post magnitudinem nominis Romani.</quote> <cit><quote>"I know not why interpreters should find any difficulty in this passage. I understand it to signify simply since the Romans became so great as they were in the time of <placeName key="tgn,2069580">Hannibal</placeName>; for, before that period they had suffered even heavier calamities, especially from the Gauls."</quote><bibl>Cortius.</bibl></cit></note> Masinissa, King of the Numidians, being received into alliance by Publius Scipio, who, from his merits was afterward surnamed Africanus, had performed for us many eminent exploits in the field. In return for which services, after the Carthaginians <pb n="85"/>were subdued, and after Syphax,<note anchored="true" place="foot">Syphax] <cit><quote>"He was King of the Masæsyli in <placeName key="tgn,7016752">Numidia</placeName>; was at first an enemy to the Carthaginians (Liv. xxiv. 48), and afterward their friend (Liv. xxviii. 17). He then changed sides again, and made a treaty with Scipio ; but having at length been offered the hand of Sophonisba, the daughter of Asdrubal, in marriage, he accepted it, and returned into alliance with the Carthaginians. Being subsequently taken prisoner by Masinissa and Lælius, the lieutenant of Scipio, (Liv. xxx. 2) he was carried into <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName>, and died at <placeName key="perseus,Tibur">Tibur</placeName> (Liv. xxx. 45)."</quote><bibl>Bernouf.</bibl></cit></note> whose power in <placeName key="tgn,1000080">Italy</placeName> was great and extensive, was taken prisoner, the Roman people presented to Masinissa, as a free gift, all the cities and lands that they had captured. Masinissa's friendship for us, accordingly, remained faithful and inviolate; his reign<note anchored="true" place="foot">His reign] <quote xml:lang="lat">Imperii.</quote> Cortius thinks that the grant of the Romans ceased with the life of Masinissa, and that his son Micipsa, reigned only over that part of <placeName key="tgn,7016752">Numidia</placeName> which originally belonged to his father. But in this opinion succeeding commentators have generally supposed him to be mistaken.</note> and his life ended together. His son, Micipsa, alone succeeded to his kingdom; Mastanabal and Gulussa, his two brothers, having been carried off by disease. Micipsa had two sons, Adherbal and Hiempsal, and had brought up in his house, with the same care as his own children, a son of his brother Mastanabal, named Jugurtha, whom Masinissa, as being the son of a concubine, had left in a private station.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="6"><p> Jugurtha, as he grew up, being strong in frame, graceful in person, but, above all, vigorous in understanding, did not allow himself to be enervated by pleasure and indolence, but, as is the usage of his country, exercised himself in riding, throwing the javelin, and contending in the race with his equals in age; and, though he excelled them all in reputation, he was yet beloved by all. He also passed much of his time in hunting; he was first, or among the first, to wound the lion and other beasts; he performed very much, but spoke very little of himself.</p><p>Micipsa, though he was at first gratified with these circumstances, considering that the merit of Jugurtha would be an honor to his kingdom, yet, when he reflected that the youth was daily increasing in popularity, while he himself was advanced in age, and his children but young, he was extremely disturbed at the state of things, and revolved it frequently in his mind. The very nature of man, ambitious of power, and eager to gratify its desires, gave him reason for apprehension, as well as the opportunity afforded by his own age and that <pb n="86"/>of his children, which was sufficient, from the prospect of such a prize, to lead astray even men of moderate desires. The affection of the Numidians, too, which was strong toward Jugurtha, was another cause for alarm; among whom, if he should cut off such a man, he feared that some insurrection or war might arise.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>