You add real causes of the enmity between you, that your
 father as tribune of the people prosecuted the father of Lucius Flaccus when he was curule
 aedile. But that ought not to have been very annoying even to Flaccus's father himself;
 especially as he, who was prosecuted, was afterwards made praetor and consul, and the man who
 prosecuted him could not even remain in the city as a private individual. But if you thought
 that a reasonable ground for enmity, why, when Flaccus was military tribune, did you serve as a
 soldier in his legion, when by the military law you might have avoided the injustice of the
 tribune? And why did the praetor summon you, his hereditary enemy, to his counsels? And how
 sacredly such obligations are accustomed to be observed, you all know. At present we are prosecuted by men who were our counselors. “Flaccus issued a
 decree.” Did he issue a different decree from what he ought? “against freemen.” Was it contrary
 to the resolution to which the senate had come? “He issued this decree against an absent man.”
 When you were in the same race, and when you refused to come forward, that is a different thing
 from being absent. [The resolution of the senate and the decree of Flaccus are read.] What next?
 suppose he had not made a decree, but had only issued an edict, who could have found fault with
 him with truth? Are you going to find fault with the letters of my brother, full of humanity and
 equity. The same This passage is given up by every commentator as
 irretrievably corrupt. letters which, having been given by me Read
 the letters of Quintus Cicero. [The letters of Quintus Cicero are read.]