<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi017.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="39" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>I come now to the evidence of the people of Dorylaeum, who, when they were brought into court
    said that they had lost their public documents near some caverns. O the shepherds (I know not
    who they were), the literary shepherds! if they took nothing from those men except the letters!
    But we suspect that there is some other reason, and that we should not think those men quite
    destitute of all cunning. There is, I imagine, a heavier penalty at Dorylaeum than among other
    people, for forging or tampering with written documents. If they had produced the genuine
    letters, there was no accusation in them; if they produced forged ones, there was a penalty for
    such an act. They thought the finest thing they could do was to say that they were lost.
     </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="40" resp="perseus"><p> Let them be quiet then, and allow me to set this down as so
    much gain, said to turn to something else. They will not allow me to do so. For some one or
    other gives them a lift, and says that he, as a private person, had given him money. But this
    cannot possibly be endured. He who reads things from those public documents which have been in
    the power of the prosecutor, ought not to carry any weight with him; but, nevertheless, a formal
    trial appears to take place when the documents themselves, of whatever character they may be,
    are produced. But when a man, whom not one of you has ever seen, whom no living mortal has ever
    heard of only says, “I gave,” will you hesitate, O judges, to save a most noble citizen from
    this most unknown of Phrygians? And this very man was lately disbelieved by three honourable and
    worthy Roman knights, when in a case in which a man's liberty was at stake, he said that the man
    who was claimed was his own kinsman. How has it come about that the man who was not considered a
    trustworthy witness as to his own blood and family is a credible authority concerning a public
    injury? </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>