<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi017.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="17" resp="perseus"><p> But if these things were
    constantly taking place at Athens, when that was the first city, not only in Greece, but in
    almost all the world, what moderation do you suppose there was in the assemblies in Phrygia and
    Mysia? It is usually men of those nations who throw our own assemblies into confusion; what do
    you suppose is the case when they are by themselves? Athenagoras, that celebrated man of Cyme,
    was beaten with rods, because, at a time of famine, he had ventured to export corn. An assembly
    was summoned at the request of Laelius. Athenagoras came forward, and, being a Greek among
    Greeks, he said a good deal, not about his fault, but in the way of complaining of his
    punishment. They voted by holding up their hands. A decree was passed. Is this evidence? The men
    of Pergamus, having been lately feasted, having been a little while before glutted with every
    sort of present,—I mean, all the cobblers and girdle-makers in Pergamus,—cried out whatever
    Mithridates (who governed that multitude, not by his authority, but by fattening them up) chose.
    Is this the testimony of that city? I brought witnesses from Sicily in pursuance of the public
    resolution of the island. But the evidence that I brought was the evidence not of an excited
    assembly, but of a senate on its oath. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="18" resp="perseus"><p> So that I am not now
    arguing against the reception of evidence; but you are to decide whether these statements are to
    be considered evidence. <milestone n="8" unit="chapter"/>
   <milestone unit="para"/>A virtuous young man, born in an honourable rank, and eloquent, comes with a most numerous and
    splendidly appointed train into a town of the Greeks. He demands an assembly. He frightens
    wealthy men and men of authority from opposing him by summoning them to give evidence; he tempts
    the needy and worthless by the hope of being employed on the commission, and by a public grant
    for the expenses of their journey, and also by his own private liberality. What trouble is it to
    excite artisans, and shopkeepers, and all such dregs of a city, against any man, and especially
    against one who has lately had the supreme authority there, and could not possibly be very
    popular, on account of the odium attached to the very name of supreme power? </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>