<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi015.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="61" resp="perseus"><p> And this, O judges, you may ascertain from the number of
    settlers, most honourable men, here present; who are here now, and are anxious and above all
    things desirous that the man, the patron, the defender, the guardian of that colony, (if they
    have not been able to see him in the safe enjoyment of every sort of good fortune and every
    honour,) may at all events, in the present misfortune by which he is attacked, be defended and
    preserved by your means. The natives of Pompeii are here also with equal eagerness, who are
    accused as well as he is by the prosecutors; men whose differences with the settlers about walks
    and about votes have not gone to such lengths as to make them differ also about their common
    safety. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="62" resp="perseus"><p> And even this virtue of Publius Sulla appears to me
    to be one which ought not to be passed over in silence;—that though that colony was originally
    settled by him, and though the fortune of the Roman people has separated the interests of the
    settlers from the fortunes of the native citizens of Pompeii, he is still so popular among, and
    so much beloved by both parties, that he seems not so much to have dispossessed the one party of
    their lands as to have settled both of them in that country. <milestone unit="para"/><milestone n="22" unit="chapter"/>
   “But the gladiators, and all those preparations for violence, were got together because of the
    motion of Caecilius.” And then he inveighed bitterly against Caecilius, a most virtuous and most
    accomplished man, of whose virtue and constancy, O judges, I will only say thus much,—that he
    behaved in such a manner with respect to that motion which he brought forward, not for the
    purpose of doing away with, but only of relieving his brother's misfortune, that though he
    wished to consult his brother's welfare, he was unwilling to oppose the interests of the
    republic; he proposed his law the impulse of brotherly affection, and he abandoned it because he
    was dissuaded from it by his brother's authority. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="63" resp="perseus"><p> And Sulla
    is accused by Lucius Caecilius, in that business in which both of them deserve praise. In the
    first place Caecilius, for having proposed a law in which he appeared to wish to rescind an
    unjust decision; and Sulla, who reproved him, and chose to abide by the decision. For the
    constitution of the republic derives its principal consistency from formal legal decisions. Nor
    do I think that any one ought to yield so much to his love for his brother as to think only of
    the welfare of his own relations, and to neglect the common safety of all. He did not touch the
    decision already given, but he took away the punishment for bribery which had been lately
    established by recent laws. And, therefore, by this motion he was seeking, not to rescind a
    decision, but to correct a defect in the law. When a man is complaining of a penalty, it is not
    the decision with which he is finding fault but the law. For the conviction is the act of
    judges, and that is let stand; the penalty is the act of the law, and that may be lightened.
     </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="64" resp="perseus"><p> Do not therefore, alienate from your cause the inclinations
    of those orders of men which preside over the courts of justice with the greatest authority and
    dignity. No one, has attempted to annul the decision which has been given; nothing of that sort
    has been proposed. What Caecilius always thought while grieved at the calamity which had
    befallen his brother, was, that the power of the judges ought to be preserved unimpaired, but
    that the severity of the law required to be mitigated. <milestone unit="para"/><milestone n="23" unit="chapter"/>
   But why need I say more on this topic? I might speak perhaps, and I would speak willingly and
    gladly, if affection and fraternal love had impelled Lucius Caecilius a little beyond the limits
    which regular and strict duty requires of a man; I would appeal to your feelings, I would invoke
    the affection which every one feels for his own relations; I would solicit pardon for the error
    of Lucius Caecilius, from your own inmost thoughts and from the common humanity of all men.
     </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="65" resp="perseus"><p> The law was proposed only a few days; it was never begun to
    be put in train to be carried; it was laid on the table in the senate. On the first of January,
    when we had summoned the senate to meet in the Capitol, nothing took precedence of it; and
    Quintus Metellus the praetor said, that what he was saying was by the command of Sulla; that
    Sulla did <pb n="400"/> not wish such a motion to be brought forward respecting his case. From
    that time forward Caecilius applied himself to many measures for the advantage of the republic;
    he declared that he by his intercession would stop the agrarian law, which was in every part of
    it denounced and defeated by me. He resisted infamous attempts at corruption; he never threw any
    obstacles in the way of the authority of the senate. He behaved himself in his tribuneship in
    such a manner, that, laying aside all regard for his own domestic concerns, he thought of
    nothing for the future but the welfare of the republic. </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>