<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi010.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="6" resp="perseus"><p> And, therefore, O judges, I beg this of you before I begin
    to speak of the cause itself; in the first place, as is most reasonable, that you will bring no
    prejudice into court with you. In truth, we shall lose not only the authority, but even the name
    of judges, unless we judge from the facts which appear in the actual trials, and if we bring
    into court with us minds already made up on the subject at home. In the second place, I beg of
    you, if you have already adopted any opinion in your minds, that if reason shall eradicate
    it,—if my speech shall shake it,—if, in short, truth shall wrest it from you, you will not
    resist, but will dismiss it from your minds, if not willingly, at all events, impartially. I beg
    you, also, when I am speaking to each particular point, and effacing any impression my adversary
    may have made, not silently to let your thoughts dwell on the contrary statement to mine, but to
    wait to the end, and allow me to maintain the order of my arguments which I propose to myself;
    and when I have summed up, then to consider in your minds whether I have passed over anything.
     </p></div><milestone n="3" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="7" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>I, O judges, am thoroughly aware that I am under taking a cause which has now for eight years
    together been constantly discussed in a spirit opposed to the interests of my client, and which
    has been almost convicted and condemned by the silent opinion of men; but if any god will only
    incline your good-will to listen to me patiently, I will show you that there is nothing which a
    man has so much reason to dread as envy,—that when he has incurred envy, there is nothing so
    much to be desired by an innocent man as an impartial tribunal, because in this alone can any
    end and termination be found at last to undeserved disgrace. Wherefore, I am in very great hope,
    if I am able fully to unravel all the circumstances of this case, and to effect all that I wish
    by my speech, that this place, and this bench of judges before whom I am pleading, which the
    other side has expected to be most terrible and formidable to Aulus Cluentius, will be to him a
    harbour at last, and a refuge for the hitherto miserable and tempest-tossed bark of his
    fortunes. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="8" resp="perseus"><p> Although there are many things which seem to me
    necessary to be mentioned respecting the common dangers to which all men are exposed by
    unpopularity, before I speak about the cause itself; still, that I may not keep your
    expectations too long in suspense by my speech, I will come to the charge itself, only begging
    you, O judges, as I am aware I must frequently do in the course of this trial, to listen to me,
    as if this cause were now being this day pleaded for the first time,—as, in fact, it is; and not
    as if it had already been often discussed and proved. For on this day opportunity is given us
    for the first time of effacing that old accusation; up to this time mistake and odium have had
    the principal influence in the whole cause. Wherefore, while I reply with brevity and clearness
    to the accusation of many years standing, I entreat you, O judges, to listen to me, as I know
    that you are predetermined to do, with kindness and attention. </p></div><milestone n="4" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="9" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>Aulus Cluentius is said to have corrupted a tribunal with money, in order to procure the
    condemnation of his innocent enemy, Statius Albius. I will prove, O judges, in the first place,
    (since that is the principal wickedness charged against him, and the chief pretext for casting
    odium upon him, that an innocent man was condemned through the influence of in your minds
    whether I have money,) that no one was ever brought before a court on heavier charges, or with
    more unimpeachable witnesses against him to prove them. In the second place, that a previous
    examination into the matter had been made by the very same judges who afterwards condemned him,
    with such a result that he could not possibly have been acquitted, not only by them, but by any
    other imaginable tribunal. When I have demonstrated this, then I will prove that point which I
    am aware is particularly indispensable, that that tribunal was indeed tampered with, not by
    Cluentius, but by the party hostile to Cluentius; and I will enable you to see clearly in the
    whole of that cause what the facts really were—what mistake gave rise to—and what had its origin
    in the unpopularity undeservedly stirred up against Cluentius. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="10" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/> The first point is this, from which it may be clearly seen that Cluentius had the greatest
    reason to confide in the justice of his cause, because he came down to accuse Albius relying on
    the most certain facts and unimpeachable witnesses. While on this topic, it is necessary for me,
    O judges, briefly to explain the accusations of which Albius was convicted. I demand of you, O
    Oppianicus, to believe that I speak unwillingly of the affair in which your father was
    implicated, because I am compelled by considerations of good faith, and of my duty as counsel
    for the defence. And, if I am unable at the present moment to satisfy you of this, yet I shall
    have many other opportunities of satisfying you at some future time; but unless I do justice to
    Cluentius now, I shall have no subsequent opportunity of doing justice to him. At the same time
    who is there who can possibly hesitate to speak against a man who has been condemned and is
    dead, on behalf of one unconvicted and living, when in the case of him who is being so spoken
    against conviction has taken away all danger of further disgrace, and death all fear of any
    further pain? and when, on the other hand, no disaster can happen to that man on behalf of whom
    one is speaking, without causing him the most acute feeling and pain of mind, and without
    branding his future life with the greatest disgrace and ignominy? </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>