<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi009.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="56" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>When you opposed that law, the Roman people, O Quintus Hortensius, thought that you, and the
    others who held the same opinion with you, delivered your sentiments in a bold and gallant
    spirit. But still, in a matter affecting the safety of the commonwealth, the Roman people
    preferred consulting its own feelings of indignation to your authority. Accordingly, one law,
    one man, and one year, delivered us not only from that misery and disgrace, but also caused us
    again at length to appear really to be the masters of all nations and countries by land and sea.
     </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="57" resp="perseus"><p> And on this account the endeavour to detract, shall I say
    from Gabinius, or from Pompeius, or (what would be truer still) from both? appears to me
    particularly unworthy; being done in order that Aulus Gabinius might not be appointed lieutenant
    to Cnaeus Pompeius, though he requested and begged it. Is he who begs for a particular
    lieutenant in so important a war unworthy to obtain any one whom he desires, when all other
    generals have taken whatever lieutenants they chose, to assist them in pillaging the allies and
    plundering the provinces? or ought he, by whose law safety and dignity has been given to the
    Roman people, and to all nations, to be prevented from sharing in the glory of that commander
    and that army, which exists through his wisdom and was appointed at his risk? </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="58" resp="perseus"><p> Was it allowed to Caius Falcidius, to Quintus Metellus, to Quintus Caelius
    Laterensis, and to Cnaeus Lentulus, all of whom I name to do them honour, to be lieutenants the
    year after they had been tribunes of the people; and shall men be so exact in the case of
    Gabinius alone, who, in this war which is carried on under the provisions of the Gabinian law,
    and in the case of this commander and this army which he himself appointed with your assistance,
    ought to have the first right of any one? And concerning whose appointment as lieutenant I hope
    that the consuls will bring forward a motion in the senate; and if they hesitate, or are
    unwilling to do so, I undertake to bring it forward myself; nor, O Romans, shall the hostile
    edict of any one deter me from relying on you and defending your privileges and your kindness.
    Nor will I listen to anything except the interposition of the tribunes; and as to that, those
    very men who threaten it, will, I apprehend, consider over and over again what they have a right
    to do. In my own opinion, O Romans, Aulus Gabinius alone has a right to be put by the side of
    Cnaeus Pompeius as a partner of the glory of his exploits in the maritime war; because the one,
    with the assistance of your votes, gave to that man alone the task of undertaking that war, and
    the other, when it entrusted to him, undertook it and terminated it.</p></div><milestone n="20" unit="chapter"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="59" resp="perseus"><p><milestone unit="para"/>It remains for me to speak of the authority and opinion of Quintus Catulus; who, when he asked
    of you, if you thus placed all your dependence on Cnaeus Pompeius, in whom you would have any
    hope, if anything were to happen to him, received a splendid reward for his own virtue and
    worth, when you all, with almost one voice, cried out that you would, in that case, put your
    trust in him. In truth he is such a man, that no affair can be so important, or so difficult,
    that, he cannot manage it by his wisdom, or defend it by his integrity, or terminate it by his
    valour. But, in this case, I entirely differ from him; because, the less certain and the less
    lasting the life of man is, the more ought the republic to avail itself of the life and valour
    of any admirable man, as long as the immortal gods allow it to do so. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="60" resp="perseus"><p> But let no innovation be established contrary to the precedents and principles
    of our ancestors.— I will not say, at this moment, that our ancestors in peace always obeyed
    usage, but in war were always guided by expediency, and always accommodated themselves with new
    plans to the new emergencies of the times. I will not say that two most important wars, the
    Punic war and the Spanish war, were put an end to by one general; that two most powerful cities,
    which threatened the greatest danger to this empire— <placeName key="perseus,Carthage">Carthage</placeName> and <placeName key="tgn,7017511">Numantia</placeName>, were destroyed by
    the same Scipio. I will not remind you that it was but lately determined by you and by your
    ancestors, to rest all the hopes of the empire on Caius Marius, so that the same man conducted
    the war against Jugurtha, and against the Cimbri, and against the Teutones. But recollect, in
    the case of Cnaeus Pompeius himself, with reference to whom Catulus objects to having any new
    regulations introduced, how many new laws have been made with the most willing consent of
    Quintus Catulus.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>