Therefore in other disputes and
 trials, when the question at issue is, whether a thing has been done or not, whether what is
 alleged be true or false; and when false witnesses are sometimes suborned, and false documents
 foisted in; it is possible that sometimes a virtuous judge may be led into error by a seemingly
 honourable and probable pretence; or that an opportunity may be given to a dishonest judge, of
 appearing to be guided by the witnesses, or by the documents produced, though in reality he has
 knowingly given a wrong decision. For questions of law there is nothing of this sort, O judges:
 there are no forged documents, no dishonest witnesses; even that overgrown power, which has sway
 in this state, is dormant with respect to cases of this sort; it has no means of attacking the
 judge, or of moving a finger. For this can be said to a judge by some man who is not so
 scrupulous as he is influential; “Decide, I pray you, that this has been done or planned; give
 credit to this witness; establish the genuineness of these documents;”— but this cannot be said, “Decide that if a man has a posthumous son born to
 him, his will is not thereby invalidated; decide that a thing is due which a woman had promised
 without the sanction of her trustee.” There is no opening for transactions of this sort, nor for
 any one's power or influence; in fact,—and this gives questions of law a more important and a
 more holy character,—a judge cannot be corrupted even by a bribe in cases of this sort.
 That very witness of yours who dared to say “that he had
 been seen to do . . .” in a case where he could by no possibility know even of what the man was
 accused—even he would not venture to decide that a dowry was due to a husband which the woman
 had promised without the consent of her trustee. Oh admirable principle, and worthy of being
 maintained by you on this account, O judges! 
 For, indeed, what is the civil law? A thing which can neither be bent by influence, nor broken
 down by power, nor adulterated by corruption; which, if it be, I will not say overwhelmed, but
 even neglected or carelessly upheld, there will then be no ground for any one feeling sure
 either that he possesses anything, or that he shall leave anything to his children. For what is the advantage of having a house or a farm left one by one's
 father, or in any way legitimately acquired, if it be uncertain whether you will be able to
 retain those things which are yours by every right of property? if law be but little fortified?
 if nothing can be upheld by public and civil law, in opposition to the influence of any powerful
 man? What is the advantage, I say, of having a farm, if all the laws which have been most
 properly laid down by our ancestors about boundaries, about possession, and water, and roads,
 may all be disturbed and changed in any manner? Believe me, every one of you has received a
 greater inheritance in respect of his property, from justice and from the laws than from those
 from whom he received the property itself. For it can happen, in consequence of anybody's will,
 that a farm may come to me; but it cannot be ensured to me, except by the civil law, that I
 shall be able to retain what has become my own. A farm can be left me by my father, but the
 enjoyment of the farm—that is to say, freedom from all anxiety and danger of law-suits—is not
 left to me by my father, but by the laws. Aqueducts, supply of water, roads, a right of way,
 comes from my father, but the ratified possession of all these things is derived from the civil
 law. Wherefore you ought to maintain and preserve that public
 inheritance of law which you have received from your ancestors with no less care than your
 private patrimony and property, not only because this last is fenced round and protected by the
 civil law, but also because if a man loses his patrimony, it is only an individual who suffers,
 but if the law be lost, the disaster affects the whole state. 
 In this very cause, O judges, if we do not succeed in establishing this point, that a man is
 driven away,—if it is evident that he has been repelled and put to flight with violence by armed
 Caecina will not lose his property, which, however, he would bear the loss of with a brave
 spirit, if the occasion required it; he will only not be restored to the possession of it
 immediately; nothing more.