One thing, O Lucius Quinctius, I should wish to obtain from you, which, although I desire
 because it is useful for me, still I request of you because it is reasonable and
 just,—that you would regulate the time that you take to yourself for speaking, so as
 to leave the judges some time for coming to a decision. For the time before, there was no end
 to your speech in his defence; night alone set bounds to your oration. Now, if you please, do
 not do the same; this I beg of you. Nor do I beg it on this account, because I think it
 desirable for me that you should pass over some topics, or that you should fail to state them
 with sufficient elegance, and at sufficient length; but because I do think it enough for you
 to state each fact only once. And if you do that, I have no fear that the whole day will be
 taken up in talking.
 	 The subject of this trial which comes before you, O judges, is, What is the pecuniary amount
 of the damage inflicted on Marcus Tullius by the malice of the household of Quintus Fabius, by
 men armed and banded together in a violent manner. Those damages we have taxed; the valuation
 is yours; the decision given is that the amends shall be fourfold.
	 As all laws and all legal proceedings which seem at all harsh and severe have originated in
 the dishonesty and injustice of wicked men, so this form of procedure also has been
 established within these few years on account of the evil habits and excessive licentiousness
 of men. For when many families were said to be wandering armed about the distant fields and
 pasture lands, and to be committing murders, and as that fact appeared to concern not merely
 the estates of individuals, but the main interests of the republic, Marcus Lucullus, who often
 presided as judge with the greatest equity and wisdom, first planned this tribunal, and had
 regard to this object, that all men should so restrain their households that they should not
 only not go about armed to inflict damage on any one, but, even if they were attacked, should
 defend themselves by law, rather than by arms; and though he
 knew that the Aquilian law The Lex Aquilia 
 provided for the damages which any one was to pay to the owner, in the case of his having
 unlawfully killed any slave or quadruped. Actions under this law were limited to damage done
 by actual contact, though the subject of them was extended afterwards. Vide Smith, Dict. Ant. p. 313, in voc. Damni injuria
 Actio . about damage existed, still he thought, that, as in the time of our
 ancestors both men's estates and their desires were less, and as their families, not being
 very numerous, were restrained by fear of important consequences, it very seldom happened that
 a man would be killed, and it was thought a nefarious and unprecedented atrocity; and
 therefore, that there was at that time no need of a system of judicial procedure with
 reference to bodies of men collected in a violent manner and armed; (for he thought that if
 any one established a law or a tribunal for matters which were not usual, he seemed not so
 much to forbid them as to put people in mind of them.) In these times, when after a long civil war our manners
 had so far degenerated that men used arms with less scruple, he thought it necessary to
 establish a system of judicial procedure, with reference to the whole of a man's household, in
 the formula, “Which was said to have been done by the household,” and to
 assign judges,