<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" subtype="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi006.perseus-eng2"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="36" resp="perseus"><p>If this were the only case, (it would be well, indeed, if it were,) but if it
      were, the only case, still you, O judges, being such as you are, ought to be unwilling that an
      affair of the greatest importance, affecting not only the welfare of the entire republic but
      also the fortunes of individuals—that a most dignified tribunal, one established
      with the greatest deliberation, and for the weightiest reasons, should appear to be put an end
      to by you. But this is not the only thing at stake. <gap reason="lost"/> the decision in this
      case is waited for with so much anxiety as shows that it is expected to rule not one case
      only, but all cases. <gap reason="lost"/>
					 <add><milestone unit="para"/>Shall I say that violence was done by the household of Publius Fabius? Our adversaries do
        not deny it. That damage was done to Marcus Tullius? You grant that—I have carried
        one point. That this violence was done by armed men? You do not deny that—I have
        carried a second point. You deny that it was done with malice; on this point we join issue.
         <gap reason="lost"/> Nor, indeed, do I see any need of looking for arguments by which that
        trivial and insignificant defence of his may be refuted and done away with.
      </add>
      </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>