“I admit,” says he,
 “that Roscius demanded his own share from Flavius; I admit that he left
 Fannius's right to make a similar demand entire and unimpaired; but I contend that what
 he got for himself became the common property of the partnership” than which
 nothing more tricky or more scandalous can be said. For I ask whether Roscius had the
 power to demand his share from the partnership, or not? If he could not, how did he get
 it? If he could, how was it that he did not demand it for himself? For that which is
 demanded for one's self, is certainly not exacted for another.