If you say it was on some other account, what dealings had you ever
 had with him? None. Had you obtained any verdict against him? No. I am wasting time to
 no purpose. He never, he says, got a hundred thousand sesterces from Flavius at all, neither on account of Panurgus, nor of any
 one else. If I prove that, after this recent agreement with Roscius, you did get a
 hundred thousand sesterces from Flavius, what have you to
 allege why you should not leave the court defeated with disgrace? By what witness then
 shall I make this plain?