I asked a little before—what was very material to the business, on what
 account Flavius, when (as they say) he was settling the whole claim, did neither take
 security from Roscius, nor obtain a release from all demands from Fannius? But now I ask
 how it was that, when he had settled the whole affair with Roscius, he paid also a
 hundred thousand sesterces to Fannius on his separate
 account? (a thing still more strange and incredible.) I should like to know, O Saturius,
 what answer are you preparing to give to this? Whether you are going to say that Fannius
 never got a hundred thousand sesterces from Flavius at all,
 or that he got them for some other claim, and on some other account?