What can you get from Flavius, if Flavius owes you nothing?
 Moreover, why does he now enter into a mutual engagement about a sum which he has
 already exacted some time ago? But what can Flavius be going to give you, if he has
 already paid Roscius everything that he owed? Why is this new mutual arrangement
 interposed in so old an affair, in a matter so entirely settled, in a partnership which
 has been dissolved? Who is the drawer up of this agreement? who is the witness? who is
 the arbitrator? who? You, O Piso : for you
 begged Quintus Roscius to give Fannius fifteen thousand sesterces , for his care, for his labour, for having been his agent, and for
 having given security, on this condition, that, if he get anything from Flavius, he
 should give half of that sum to Roscius. Does not that agreement seem to show you with
 sufficient clearness that Roscius settled the affair on his own behalf alone?