For I confess that, if Roscius touched anything on their joint
 account, he ought to pay it to the partnership. Did he settle the quarrel of the
 partnership, and not merely his own, when he received this farm from Flavius? If so, why
 did he not give security to Flavius, that no one else should make any demand on him? He
 who settles his own demand only, leaves to the rest their right of action unimpaired; he
 who acts for his partners, gives security that none of them shall afterwards make any
 demand. Why did it not occur to Flavius to take this precaution for himself? Was he,
 forsooth, not aware that Panurgus belonged to a partnership. He knew that. Was he not
 aware that Fannius was Roscius' partner? Thoroughly; for he himself had a law-suit
 commenced with him.