<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi002.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="143" resp="perseus"><p>But all
          this that I have been now saying, as I mentioned before, is said on my own account, though
          the republic, and my own indignation, and the injuries done by these fellows, have
          compelled me to say it. But Roscius is indignant at none of these things; he accuses no
          one; he does not complain of the loss of his patrimony; he, ignorant of the world, rustic
          and down that he is, thinks that all those things which you say were done by Sulla were
          done regularly, legally and according to the law of nations. If he is only exempted from
          blame and acquitted of this nefarious accusation, he will be glad to leave the court.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="144" resp="perseus"><p>If he is freed from this unworthy suspicion, he says
          that he can give up all his property with equanimity. He begs and entreats you, O
          Chrysogonus, if he has converted no part of his father's most ample possessions to his own
          use; if he has defrauded you in no particular; if he has given up to you and paid over and
          weighed out to you all his possessions with the most scrupulous faith; if he has given up
          to you the very garment with which he was clothed, and the ring off his finger; if he has
          stripped himself bare of everything, and has excepted nothing—he entreats you, I say, that
          he may be allowed to pass his life in innocence and indigence, supported by the assistance
          of his friends.</p></div><milestone n="50" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="145" resp="perseus"><p>“You are in possession of my farms,” says he; “I am living on the charity of others; I do
          not object to that, both because I have a calm mind, and because it is inevitable. My own
          house is open to you, and is closed against myself. I endure that. You are master of my
          numerous household; I have not one slave. I submit to that, and think it is to be borne.”
          What would you have more? What are you aiming at? Why are you attacking me now? In what
          point do you think your desires injured by me? In what point do I stand in the way of your
          advantage? In what do I hinder you? If you wish to slay the man for the sake of his
          spoils, you have despoiled him. What do you want more? If you want to slay him out of
          enmity, what enmity have you against him whose farms you took possession of before you
          knew himself? If you fear him, can you fear anything from him who you see is unable to
          ward off so atrocious an injury from himself? If, because the possessions which belonged
          to Roscius have become yours, on that account you seek to destroy his son, do you not show
          that you are afraid of that which you above all other men ought not to be afraid of;
          namely, that sometime or other their father's property may be restored to the children of
          proscribed persons?</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="146" resp="perseus"><p>You do wrong, O Chrysogonus, if
          you place greater hope of being able to preserve your purchase, than in those exploits
          which Lucius Sulla has performed But if you have no cause for wishing this unhappy man to
          be afflicted with such a grievous calamity; if he has given up to you everything but his
          life, and has reserved to himself nothing of his paternal property, not even as a memorial
          of his father—then, in the name of the gods, what is the meaning of this cruelty, of this
          savage and inhuman disposition? What bandit was ever so wicked, what pirate was ever so
          barbarous, as to prefer stripping off his spoils from his victim stained with his blood,
          which he might possess his plunder unstained, without blood?</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>