<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi002.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="106" resp="perseus"><p>I will
          not argue thus. It is probable that the Roscii gave information of that matter to
          Chrysogonus, for there was of old, friendship between them and Chrysogonus; for though the
          Roscii had many ancient patrons and friends hereditarily connected with them, they ceased
          to pay any attention and respect to them, and betook themselves to the protection and
          support of Chrysogonus.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="107" resp="perseus"><p>I can say all this with truth;
          for in this case I have no need to rely on conjecture. I know to a certainty that they
          themselves do not deny that Chrysogonus made the attack on this property at their
          instigation. If you see with your own eyes who has received a part of the reward for the
          information, can you possibly doubt, O judges, who gave the information? Who then are in
          possession of that property; and to whom did Chrysogonus give a share in it? The two
          Roscii!—Any one else? No one else, O judges. Is there then any doubt that they put this
          plunder in Chrysogonus's way, who have received from him a share of the plunder?</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="108" resp="perseus"><p>Come now let us consider the action of the Roscii by
          the judgment of Chrysogonus himself. If in that contest the Roscii had done nothing which
          was worth speaking of, on what account were they presented with such rewards by
          Chrysogonus? If they did nothing more than inform him of the fact, was it not enough for
          him to thank them? Why are these farms of such value immediately given to
              <persName><surname>Capito</surname></persName>? Why does that fellow Roscius possess
          all the rest in common property with Chrysogonus? Is it not evident, O judges, that
          Chrysogonus, understanding the whole business, gave them as spoils to the Roscii?</p></div><milestone n="38" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="109" resp="perseus"><p><persName><surname>Capito</surname></persName> came as a deputy to the camp, as one of
          the ten chief men of Ameria. Learn from his behaviour on this deputation the whole life
          and nature and manners of the man. Unless you are of opinion, O judges, that there is no
          duty and no right so holy and solemn that his wickedness and perfidy has not tampered with
          and violated it, then judge him to be a very excellent man.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="110" resp="perseus"><p>He is the hindrance to Sulla's being informed of this affair; he
          betrays the plans and intentions of the other deputies to Chrysogonus; he gives him
          warning to take care that the affair be not conducted openly; he points out to him, that
          if the sale of the property be prevented, he will lose a large sum of money, and that he
          himself will be in danger of his life. He proceeds to spur him on, to deceive those who
          were joined in the commission with him; to warn him continually to take care; to hold out
          treacherously false hopes to the others; in concert with him to devise plans against them,
          to betray their counsels to him; with him to bargain for his share in the plunder, and,
          relying constantly on some delay or other, to cut off from his colleagues all access to
          Sulla. Lastly, owing to his being the prompter, the adviser, the go-between, the deputies
          did not see Sulla; deceived by his faith, or rather by his perfidy, as you may know from
          themselves, if the accuser is willing to produce them <note anchored="true">In a question
            of fact the accuser alone was permitted to submit witnesses; the defendant could not do
            so.</note> as witnesses, they brought back home with a false hope instead of a reality.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>