<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi001.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="64" resp="perseus"><p>You must either say that these things are not so;
            or that Caius Aquillius, being such a man as he is, on his oath, is to establish this
            law in the state: that he whose agent does not object to every trial which any one
            demands against him, whose agent dares to appeal from the praetor to the tribunes, is
            not defended at all, and may rightly have his goods taken possession of; may properly,
            while miserable, absent, and ignorant of it, have all the embellishments of his
            fortunes, all the ornaments of his life, taken from him with the greatest disgrace and
            ignominy. And this seems reasonable to no one.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="65" resp="perseus"><p>This
            certainly must be proved to the satisfaction of every one, that Quinctius while absent
            was defended at the trial. And as that is the ease, his goods were not taken possession
            of in accordance with the edict. But then, the tribunes of the people did not even hear
            his cause. I admit, if that be the case, that the agent ought to have obeyed the decree
            of the praetor. What; if Marcus Brutus openly said that he would intercede <note anchored="true"><foreign xml:lang="la">Intercedo</foreign> was the technical word for the
              interposition of the tribunes.</note> unless some agreement was come to between
            Alphenus himself and Naevius; does not the appeal to the tribunes seem to have been
            interposed not for the sake of delay but of assistance?</p></div><milestone n="21" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="66" resp="perseus"><p>What is done next? Alphenus, in order that all men might see that Quinctius was
            defended at the trial, that no suspicion might exist unfavourable either to his own
            duty, or to his principal's character, summons many excellent men, And, in the hearing
            of that fellow, calls them to witness that he begs this of him, in the first place, out
            of regard to their common intimacy, that he would not attempt to take any severe steps
            against Quinctius in his absence without cause; but if lie persevered in carrying on the
            contest in a most spiteful and hostile manner, that he is prepared by every upright and
            honourable method to defend him, and to prove that what he demanded was not owed, and
            that he accepted the trial which Naevius proposed.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="67" resp="perseus"><p>
            Many excellent men signed the document setting forth this fact and these conditions.
            While all matters are still unaltered, while the goods are neither advertised nor taken
            possession of, Alphenus promises Naevius that Quinctius should appear to his
            recognizances. Quinctius does appear to his recognizances. The matter lies in dispute
            while that fellow is spreading his calumnies for two years, until he could find out by
            what means the affair might be diverted out of the common course of proceeding, and the
            whole cause he confined to this single point to which it is now limited.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>