<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi001.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="55" resp="perseus"><p>What does Naevius say to all
            this? Forsooth, he laughs at our madness in expecting a consideration of the highest
            duty, or looking for the practices of good men in his conduct. What have I to do, says
            he, with all this sanctimoniousness and punctiliousness? Let good men, says he, look to
            these duties, but let them think of me thus; let them ask not what I have, but by what
            means I have acquired it, and in what rank I was born, and in what manner I was brought
            up. I remember, there is an old proverb about a buffoon; “that it is a much
            easier thing for him to become rich than to become the head of a family.”
             </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="56" resp="perseus"><p>This is what he says openly by his actions, if he
            does not dare to say it in words. If in truth he wishes to live according to the
            practices of good men, he has many things to learn and to unlearn, both which things are
            difficult to a man of his age. <milestone n="18" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/>I did not hesitate, says he, when the recognizances were forfeited, to claim the
            confiscation of his goods. It was wickedly done; but since you claim this for yourself;
            and demand that it be granted to you, let us grant it. What if he has not forfeited his
            recognizances? if the whole of that plea has been invented by you with the most extreme
            dishonesty and wickedness? if there had actually been no securities given in any cause
            between you and Publius Quinctius? What shall we call you? Wicked? why, even if the
            recognizances had been forfeited, yet in making such a demand and confiscation of his
            goods, you were proved to be most wicked. Malignant? you do not deny it. Dishonest? you
            have already claimed that as your character, and you think it a fine thing. Audacious?
            covetous? perfidious? those are vulgar and worn-out imputations, but this conduct is
            novel and unheard-of.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="57" resp="perseus"><p>What then are we to say? I fear
            forsooth lest I should either use language severer than men's nature is inclined to
            bear, or else more gentle than the cause requires. You say that the recognizances were
            forfeited. Quinctius the moment he returned to <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> asked you on what day the recognizances were drawn. You answered at
            once, on the fifth of February. Quinctius, when departing, began to recollect on what
            day he left <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> for <placeName key="tgn,1000070">Gaul</placeName>: he goes to his journal, he finds the day of his
            departure set down, the thirty-first of January. If he was at <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName> on the fifth of February we have nothing to say
            against his having entered into recognizances with you.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>