<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi001.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="51" resp="perseus"><p>Therefore our ancestors determined that such a thing should seldom happen; the praetors
            have taken care that it should only happen after deliberation; good men, even when fraud
            is openly committed, when there is no opportunity of trying the case at law, still have
            recourse to this measure timidly and hesitatingly; not till they are compelled by force
            and necessity, unwillingly, when the recognizances have often been forfeited, when they
            have been often deceived and outwitted. For they consider how serious a matter it is to
            confiscate the property of another. A good man is unwilling to slay another, even
            according to law; for he would rather say that he had saved when he might have
            destroyed, than that he had destroyed when he could have saved. Good men behave so to
            the most perfect strangers, aye, even to their greatest enemies, for the sake both of
            their reputation among men, and of the common rights of humanity; in order that, as they
            have not knowingly caused inconvenience to another, no inconvenience may lawfully befall
            them. He did not appear to his recognizances. Who? Your own relation. If that matter
            appeared of the greatest importance in itself, yet its magnitude would be lessened by
            the consideration of your relationship. He did not appear to his recognizances. Who?
            Your partner. You might forgive even a greater thing than this, to a man with whom
            either your inclination had connected you, or fortune had associated you.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="52" resp="perseus"><p>He did not appear to his recognizances. Who? He who was always
            in your company. You therefore have hurled upon him, who allowed it to happen once that
            he was not in your company, all those weapons which have been forged against those who
            have done many things for the sake of malversation and fraud.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="53" resp="perseus"><p>If your poundage was called in question, if in any trifling matter
            you were afraid of some trick, would you not have at once run off to Caius Aquillius, or
            to some other counsel? When the rights of friendship, of partnership, of relationship
            are at stake, when regard should have been had to your duty and your character, at that
            time you not only did not refer it to Caius Aquillius or to Lucius Lucilius, but you did
            not even consult yourself; you did not even say this to
            yourself—“The two hours are passed; Quinctius has not appeared to
            his recognizances; what shall I do?” If, in truth, you had said but these four
            words to yourself “What shall I do?” your covetousness and avarice
            would have had breathing time; you would have given some room for reason and prudence;
            you would have recollected yourself; you would not have come to such baseness as to be
            forced to confess before such men that in the same hour in which he did not appear to
            his recognizances you took counsel how utterly to ruin the fortunes of your relation.</p></div><milestone n="17" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="54" resp="perseus"><p>I now on your behalf consult these men, after the time has passed, and in an affair
            which is not mine, since you forgot to consult them in your own affair, and when it was
            the proper time. I ask of you, Caius Aquillius, Lucius Lucilius, Publius Quintilius, and
            Marcus Marcellus;—A certain partner and relation of mine has not appeared to
            his recognizances; a man with whom I have a long standing intimacy, but a recent dispute
            about money matters. Can I demand of the praetor to be allowed to take possession of his
            goods? Or must I, as he has a house, a wife, and children at <placeName key="perseus,Rome">Rome</placeName>, not rather give notice at his house? What is your
            opinion in this matter? If, in truth, I have rightly understood your kindness and
            prudence, I am not much mistaken what you will answer if you are consulted. You will say
            at first that I must wait; then, if he seems to be shirking the business and to be
            trifling with it too long, that I must have a meeting of our friends; must ask who his
            agent is; must give notice at his house. It can hardly be told how many steps there are
            which you would make answer ought to be taken before having recourse to this extreme and
            unnecessary course.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="55" resp="perseus"><p>What does Naevius say to all
            this? Forsooth, he laughs at our madness in expecting a consideration of the highest
            duty, or looking for the practices of good men in his conduct. What have I to do, says
            he, with all this sanctimoniousness and punctiliousness? Let good men, says he, look to
            these duties, but let them think of me thus; let them ask not what I have, but by what
            means I have acquired it, and in what rank I was born, and in what manner I was brought
            up. I remember, there is an old proverb about a buffoon; “that it is a much
            easier thing for him to become rich than to become the head of a family.”
             </p></div></div></body></text></TEI>