<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text xml:lang="eng"><body><div type="translation" xml:lang="eng" n="urn:cts:latinLit:phi0474.phi001.perseus-eng2" subtype="translation"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="44" resp="perseus"><p>But you cannot murder Publius Quinctius your own relation,
            without the greatest wickedness. That the trial may be facilitated I But neither does
            Caius Aquillius willingly decide on the life of another, nor has Quintus Hortensius been
            in the habit of pleading against a man's life. But what reply is made by us, O Caius
            Aquillius? He asks for his money: we deny that it is due. Let a trial take place
            instantly; we make no objection; is there anything more? If he is afraid that the money
            will not be forth coming when the decision is given let him take security that it shall
            be; and let him give security <note anchored="true">In many cases both plaintiff and
              defendant might be required to give security, (<foreign xml:lang="la">satis
              dare</foreign>.) Smith, Dict. Ant. p.10, V. <foreign xml:lang="la">Actio</foreign>.</note>
            for what I demand in the very same terms in which we give security.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="45" resp="perseus"><p>The matter can be terminated at once, O Caius Aquillius You can at
            once depart, being delivered from an annoyance, I had almost said, no less than that
            Quinctius is exposed to. What are we doing, Hortensius? what are we to say of this
            condition? Can we, some time or other, laying aside our weapons, discuss the money
            matter without hazard of any one's fortunes? Can we so prosecute our business, as to
            leave the life of our relation in safety? Can we adopt the character of a plaintiff, and
            lay aside that of an accuser? Yes, says he, I will take security from you, but I will
            not give you security. <milestone n="14" unit="chapter" resp="yonge"/><milestone unit="Para"/>
          But who is it that lays down for us these very reasonable conditions? who determines
            this—that what is just towards Quinctius is unjust towards Naevius? The goods
            of Quinctius, says he, were taken possession of in accordance with the edict of the
            praetor. You demand then, that I should admit that; that we should establish by our own
            sentence, as having taken place, that which we go to trial expressly to prove never did
            take place.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="46" resp="perseus"><p>Can no means be found, O Caius Aquillius,
            for a man's arriving at his rights as expeditiously as maybe without the disgrace and
            infamy and ruin of any one else? Forsooth, if anything were owed, he would ask for it:
            he would not prefer that all sorts of trials should take place, rather than that one
            from which all these arise. He, who for so many years never even asked Quinctius for the
            money, when he had an opportunity of transacting business with him every day; he who,
            from the time when he first began to behave ill, has wasted all the time in adjournments
            and respiting the recognizances; he who, after he had withdrawn his recognizance drove
            Quinctius by treachery and violence from their joint estate; who, when he had ample
            opportunity, without any one's making objection, to try a civil action, <note anchored="true">With respect to its subject matter the <foreign xml:lang="la">actio</foreign> was divided into two great divisions, the <foreign xml:lang="la">in
                personam actio</foreign> and the <foreign xml:lang="la">in rem actio</foreign>. The
              former was against a person who was bound to the plaintiff by contract or delict the
              latter applied to those cases where a man claimed a property or a right. Smith, Dict.
              Ant. p.7.</note> chose rather a charge that involved infamy; who, when he is brought
            back to this tribunal, whence all these proceedings arise, repudiates the most
            reasonable proposals; confesses that he is aiming, not at the money, but at the life and
            heart's blood of his adversary;—does he not openly say, “if anything
            were owing to me, I should demand it, and I should long ago have obtained it;</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="section" n="47" resp="perseus"><p>I would not employ so much trouble, so unpopular a course of
            legal proceeding, and such a band of favourers of my cause, if I had to make a just
            demand; I have got to extort money from one unwilling, and in spite of him; I have got
            to tear and squeeze out of a man what he does not owe; Publius Quinctius is to be cast
            down from all his fortune; every one who is powerful, or eloquent, or noble, must be
            brought into court with me; a force must be put upon truth, threats must be bandied
            about, dangers must be threatened; terrors must be brandished before his eyes, that
            being cowed and overcome by these things, he may at last yield of his own
            accord.” And, in truth, all these things, when I see who are striving against
            us, and when I consider the party sitting opposite to me, seem to be impending over, and
            to be present to us, and to be impossible to be avoided by any means. But when, O Caius
            Aquillius, I bring my eyes and my mind back to you, the greater the labour and zeal with
            which all these things are done, the more trifling and powerless do I think them.
            Quinctius then owed nothing, as you prove yourself.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>