<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="edition" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg2022.tlg009.1st1K-grc1" xml:lang="grc"><div type="textpart" subtype="chapter" n="10"><p>Ἀλλ’ οὐ ταὐτόν, φησι, τὸ ἀγέννητον καὶ τὸ
γεννητόν. εἰ δὲ τοῦτο, οὐδὲ ὁ υἱὸς τῷ πατρὶ ταὐτόν. ὅτι
μὲν φανερῶς ὁ λόγος οὗτος ἐκβάλλει τὸν υἱὸν τῆς θεότητος,
ἢ τὸν πατέρα, τί χρὴ λέγειν; εἰ γὰρ τὸ ἀγέννητον οὐσία ΙΟ
θεοῦ, τὸ γεννητὸν οὐκ οὐσία· εἰ δὲ τοῦτο, οὐκ ἐκεῖνο. τίς
ἀντερεῖ λόγος; ἑλοῦ τοίνυν τῶν ἀσεβειῶν ὁποτέραν βούλει,
ὦ κενὲ θεολόγε, εἴπερ ἀσεβεῖν πάντως ἐσπούδακας. ἔπειτα
πῶς οὐ ταὐτὸν λέγεις τὸ ἀγέννητον καὶ τὸ γεννητόν; εἰ μὲν
τὸ μὴ ἐκτισμένον καὶ ἐκτισμένον, κἀγὼ δέχομαι. οὐ γὰρ <lb n="15"/>
ταὐτὸν τῆ φύσει τὸ ἄναρχον καὶ τὸ κτιζόμενον. εἰ δὲ τὸ
<note type="footnote">1 σεαυτοῦ] ἑαυτοῦ ’in nonnull.’ || 2 απαιδευτον] + το bdf 10. 7 φασι b ||
10 χρὴ] + καὶ cef Ἴ’ 13 κενε] καινὲ c</note>
<note type="footnote">1. ἀλλ’ ἀπαίδευτον] Ἀλλά = at;
as above, ἀλλ’ οὐκ ἐνδέχεται. ‘Nay,
you will answer, it is stupid to
enquire about a single individual,
whether he is present with himself,
or not. Those things apply to other
people, not to oneself.’</note>
<note type="footnote">5. διευθύνεσθαι] ‘to be setting
people to rights about the question
whether.’</note>
<note type="footnote">6. περὶ τῶν χρ. διαιρ.] ᾿about
things which are divided by an interval
of time.’</note>
<note type="footnote">10. ‘Begotten and Unbegotten
are not the same; therefore if the
Son is begotten and the Father unbegotten,
the Son differs from the
Father.’ The statement is false;
it is the very meaning of generation
to transmit the nature of the parent.
The contrast of begotten and unbegottens
is only like that of wise and
uniwise, which can be predicated of
different individuals without involvomg
α difference of nature or essence.
To erect Unbegottenness into Constituting
the very essence of God
brings you into difficulties with other
attributes, like Immortal, Unchangesable,
able, which have ἃς good a right to
be considered ἃς constituting that
essence.</note>
<note type="footnote">7. οὐ ταὐτόν] ‘not the same thing’;
i.e. a difference of nature itself is
involved.</note>
<note type="footnote">14. πῶς οὐ ταὐτόν] llOt ’ III what
sense do you ’ for Gr. is not
prepared to admit that it is true in
any sense ; but simply challenging
the statement altogether: ’ how can
you say so? if you had said thai
created and uncreated are not tin
same, I should agree with you,
but the transmission of the ’s
nature is of the very essence of
generation.’</note>

<pb n="88"/>
γεγεννηκὸς καὶ τὸ γεγεννημένον, οὐκ ὀρθῶς λέγεται. ταὐτὸν
γὰρ εἶναι πᾶσα ἀνάγκη. αὕτη γὰρ φύσις γεννήματος,
ταὐτὸν εἶναι τῷ γεγεννηκότι κατὰ τὴν φύσιν. ἢ οὕτω
πάλιν· πῶς λέγεις τὸ ἀγέννητον καὶ τὸ γεννητόν; εἰ μὲν
<lb n="5"/> τὴν ἀγεννησίαν αὐτὴν καὶ τὴν γέννησιν, οὐ ταὐτόν·
εἰ δὲ οἷς ὑπάρχει ταῦτα, πῶς οὐ ταὐτόν; ἐπεὶ καὶ τὸ
ἄσοφον καὶ τὸ σοφὸν ἀλλήλοις μὲν οὐ ταὐτά, περὶ ταὐτὸν
δέ, τὸν ἄνθρωπον· καὶ οὐκ οὐσίας τέμνει, περὶ δὲ τὴν αὐτὴν
οὐσίαν τέμνεται. ἢ καὶ τὸ ἀθάνατον, καὶ τὸ ἄκακον, καὶ
<lb n="10"/> τὸ ἀναλλοίωτον οὐσία θεοῦ. ἀλλ’ εἰ τοῦτο, πολλαὶ οὐσίαι
θεοῦ, καὶ οὐ μία. ἢ σύνθετον ἐκ τούτων τὸ θεῖον. οὐ γὰρ
ἀσυνθέτως ταῦτα, εἴπερ οὐσίαι.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>