<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0627.tlg012.perseus-eng2" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="section" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0627.tlg012.perseus-eng2" n="1"><div type="textpart" subtype="aphorism" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0627.tlg012.perseus-eng2:1" n="1"><p rend="align(indent)"> Life is short, and Art long; the crisis fleeting; experience perilous, and decision difficult. The physician must not only be prepared to do what is right himself, but also to make the patient, the attendants, and externals cooperate. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="aphorism" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0627.tlg012.perseus-eng2:1" n="2"><p rend="align(indent)"> In disorders of the bowels and vomitings, occurring spontaneously, if the matters purged be such as ought to be purged, they do good, and are well borne; but if not, the contrary. And so artificial evacuations, if they consist of such matters as should be evacuated, do good, and are well borne; but if not, the contrary. One, then, ought to look to the country, the season, the age, and the diseases in which they are proper or not.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="aphorism" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0627.tlg012.perseus-eng2:1" n="3"><p rend="align(indent)"> In the athletae, embonpoint, if carried to its utmost limit, is dangerous, for they cannot remain in the same state nor be stationary; and since, then, they can neither remain stationary nor improve, it only remains for them to get worse; for these reasons the embonpoint should be reduced without delay, that the body may again have a commencement of reparation. Neither should the evacuations, in their case, be carried to an extreme, for this also is dangerous, but only to such a point as the person’s constitution can endure. In like manner, medicinal evacuations, if carried to an extreme, are dangerous; and again, a restorative course, if in the extreme, is dangerous.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="aphorism" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0627.tlg012.perseus-eng2:1" n="4"><p rend="align(indent)"> A slender restricted diet is always dangerous in chronic diseases, and also in acute diseases, where it is not requisite. And again, a diet brought to the extreme point of attenuation is<pb n="p.300"/> dangerous; and repletion, when in the extreme, is also dangerous. </p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="aphorism" xml:base="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0627.tlg012.perseus-eng2:1" n="5"><p rend="align(indent)">In a restricted diet, patients who transgress are thereby more hurt (than in any other?); for every such transgression, whatever it may be, is followed by greater consequences than in a diet somewhat more generous. On this account, a very slender, regulated, and restricted diet is dangerous to persons in health, because they bear transgressions of it more difficultly. For this reason, a slender and restricted diet is generally more dangerous than one a little more liberal. </p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>