<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="translation" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0557.tlg003a.perseus-eng3" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="book" n="A"><div type="textpart" subtype="sentence" n="50"><p>If you begin by admiring little things,<note anchored="true">Schweig. says that in the reading <foreign xml:lang="grc">ἐὰν φαυμάζῃς τὰ μικρὰ πρῶτον</foreign> the word <foreign xml:lang="grc">πρῶτον</foreign> is wanting in four MSS., and that Schow omitted <foreign xml:lang="grc">πρῶτον</foreign>, and that he has followed Schow. But <foreign xml:lang="grc">ποῶτον</foreign> is in Schweig.’s text.</note> you will not be thought worthy of great things: but if you despise the little, you will be greatly admired.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="sentence" n="51"><p>Nothing is smaller (meaner) than love of pleasure, and love of gain and pride. Nothing is superior to magnani- mity, and gentleness, and love of mankind, and beneficence.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="sentence" n="52"><p>They bring forward (they name, they mention) the peevish philosophers (the Stoics), whose opinion it is that pleasure is not a thing conformable to nature, but is a thing which is consequent on the things which are conformable to nature, as justice, temperance, freedom. What <pb n="417"/> then? is the soul pleased and made tranquil by the pleasures of the body which are smaller, as Epicurus says; and is it not pleased with its own good things, which are the greatest? And indeed nature has given to me modesty, and I blush much when I think of saying any thing base (indecent). This motion (feeling) does not permit me to make (consider) pleasure the good and the end (purpose) of life.<note anchored="true">See Schweig.’s note.</note></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="sentence" n="53"><p>In Rome the women have in their hands Plato’s Polity (the Republic), because it allows (advises) the women to be common, for they attend only to the words of Plato, not to his meaning. Now he does not recommend marriage and one man to cohabit with one woman, and then that the women should be common: but he takes away such a marriage, and introduces another kind of marriage. And in fine, men are pleased with finding excuses for their faults. Yet philosophy says that we ought not to stretch out even a finger without a reason.<note anchored="true">See Schweig.’s note.</note></p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="sentence" n="54"><p>Of pleasures those which occur most rarely give the greatest delight.</p></div></div></div></body></text></TEI>