<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="commentary" subtype="notes" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0527.tlg048.1st1K-eng1a" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="91"><p>11. οἱ γὰρ ὀφθαλμοὶ κ.τ.λ.] The not. have preserved the rootmeanings
of the words, but Κυρίου is an addition, and the syntax is
changed, and with it the sense. Moreover, ταπεινὸς and its cognate
verb correspond to different Hebrew words <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>E ABREVE.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="92"><p>12. ἡμέρα γὰρ Κυρίου] LXX., following Hebrew, omits the verb;
but Hebrew has the dat., with <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>E (often without verb, as Gen. xxiv. 29)
= ‘the LORD...has a day...,’ rather than as LXX., Vulg., and
This case with 5 is, however, often equivalent to a genit. of possessor.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="93"><p>πάντα] So Vulg. omnem superbum,. . .omneni arrogantm, and
A.V.; but most modems render by a neuter, as more general: R.V.
‘all that is...’</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="94"><p>14, 15. The war. drops the parallelism, and baldly reiterates
ὑψηλός. (Vol. 1. Introd. p. 36, note.)</p><pb n="114"/></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="95"><p>16. πλοῖον θαλάσσης] Probably interpreting Heb. ‘ships of
Tarshish’ as sea-going ships, in contrast to river-vessels, such as
in xviii. 2. Cf. the Prayer Book rendering of Ps. xlviii. 7 (6).</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>