<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="commentary" subtype="notes" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0527.tlg048.1st1K-eng1a" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="311"><p>ἐξέστη] ἐκστῆναι φρενῶν = μαίνεσθαι: ἐκστῆναι of a bone to go

<pb n="138"/>
out of joint. Here the meaning is ‘was distraught,’ was disturbed
from its security.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="312"><p>ὃν τρόπον. . .σαλευθῇ] Α has ὅταν before ὃν τρόπον, Q 36 41 49 62
90 106 144 147 239 301 306 after. ’s order may be an error. The
usual construction seems to be with ὅταν, as Amos iii. 12, Micah v. 8
or ἐὰν, Amos v. 19 ὅταν Α 62 147). See chap. xxxi. 4. When
ἂν is not used, and generally when an actual rather than an imaginary
action is compared, we have pres. or perf. indic., chap. xx. 3, Amos ii.
13, Ps. xlii. 1; aorist, as Micah iii. 3; or future, chap. v. 24, lxv. 8.
Where the subjunctive follows without ἂν, there is generally, if not
always, some uncertainty as to the text.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="313"><p>The following are most, if not all the occurrences of ὃν τρόπον in
Isaiah: vii. 2, ix. 3 pres. ind. in NA, verb omitted in BQ, x. 10, 11
xiii. 19 aor. ind., xiv. 19 fut., xiv. 24 perf. ind., xvii. 5 ἐὰν c. subj., xx. 3
perf. indic., xxiv. 13 ἐὰν c. subj., xxxi. 4 aor. subj. (ℵ* has fut.) with
ἐὰν NC-b A, with ὅταν Ο(Q), xxxiii. 4 ἐὰν c. subj., xxxviii. 19 verb
omitted, lii. 14 fut., lxv. 8 fut., lxvi. 22 pres. or fut. μένει in Camb.
LXX.)</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="314"><p>For similar constructions see Job xxxiii. 15, ὡς ὅταν c. subj., Prov.
xxvi. 11 (compare 14), xxvii. 8, ὥσπερ ὅταν c. subj.; in relative clauses
the aor. indic. is frequent, as Ps. i. 1, xiv. 3, Prov. xviii. 22, Ecclus.
xxxi. (xxxiv.) 8. Other passages worth noting are Job xxxiv. 19, ὃς
οὐκ ἐπαισχυνθῇ, Ecclus. l. 19, ἕως· συντελεσθῇ κόσμος· Κυρίου, Eccles. ii. 3
Ps. cxii. 8, cf. Ps. cx. 1, and 1 Cor. xv. 25, with Heb. i. 13. Of εἷ with
subj. I can ﬁnd no clear instance in LXX. In Exod. iv. 23, viii. 2, MSS.
vary, and in any case βούλῃ may be indic.; so in Jerem. xxxiii. (xlv.)
21, and perhaps Job xxxiv. 16: while in 2 Sam. xxiv. 13, 1 Kings xxii.
6, 15, Micah vi. 7, εἰ is interrogative and subj. deliberative, which
might be the case even in Luke ix. 13. Conversely, ἂν occurs with
indic. in Job i. 5 ὥς ἂν συνετελέσθησαν, PS. lxxviii. 34 ὅταν ἀπέκτεννεν,
c. The mixture of tenses is remarkable in such passages as
Lev. vi. 2, 3, Job xviii. 11 foll.; while the subj. hangs unconnected,
Eccles. ix. 14.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="315"><p>See Goodwin, Greek Mood: and T ewes, for Homeric and Attic
instances of omission of ἄν, §§ 50, 62, 63, 66; as Homer, Od. VIII. 523
ὣς δὲ γυνὴ κλαίῃσι, Soph. 0. C. 1442 εἴ σου στερηθῶ, Ajax 496, 0. T.
1231, Ο.C. 395, Thucyd. I. 137 μέχρι πλοῦς γένηται, iv. 17 οὗ μὲν
βραχεῖς ἀρκῶσι, cf. VI. 21, Herod. IV. 46. Also Swete, Introd. to
0. T. in Greek, p. 306: Hort, Introd. to N.T. T. in Greek, Appendix,
pp. 178, 179.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>