<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="commentary" subtype="notes" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0527.tlg048.1st1K-eng1a" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="216"><p>Heb. here is literally ‘to absence of limit,’ expressing extent or
consequence. τοῦ with infin. in Greek is generally ﬁnal, but acquired,
or more strictly regained, a wider range, and is here consequential
or descriptive. Cf. Thucyd. VII. 42 εἷ πέρας μηδὲν ἔσται σφίσι τοῦ
ἀπαλλαγῆναι τοῦ κινδύνου: perhaps also Luke iV. 42 ἵνα similarly, Gal.
v. 17, 1 Thess. v. 4, &amp;c.).</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="217"><p>oi. ἔνδοξοι. . .οἱ λοιμοὶ] On this and ver. 17, 18, see my note in
Journal of Theol. Studies, Vol. iv. No. 14, p. 269. The abstract nouns of
the Heb. are represented by adjectives: the meaning is close in ἔνδοξοι,
and near in μεγάλοι, Heb. ‘multitude,’ or ‘uproar’: πλούσιοι seems
to be <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>or <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>for <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>cf. γυναῖκες πλούσιαι, xxxii. 9; and
λοιμοὶ probably due to reading <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>for <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>ὧν, as <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>is rendered
by λοιμοὶ in Ezekiel, xxviii. 7, xxx. 11, &amp;c. O. L. pastes, see
Tyconius, pp. 44, 77, 79; cf. the use of λοιμὸς in such passages as
1 Macc. xv. 21, Acts xxiv. 5.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="218"><p>Symm. and Theod. rendered καὶ ὁ ἀγαλλιώμενος ἐν αὐτῇ: and these
words occur, as an addition or duplicate, in V and several cursives,
the Lucianic and some Hesychian, with minor variants: 24 has καὶ ol
νομεῖς αὐτῆς, 304 καὶ οἱ λογισμοὶ αὐτοῖς καὶ ὁ ἀγαλλόμενος ἐν αὐτῇ;
51 (90), 233 have οἶ ἀγαλλιώμενοι, of which οἶ λοιμοὶ might have been
taken for a corruption, were it not otherwise accounted for.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="219"><p>15, 16. The refrain of ii. 9, 11, 17 sounds again, louder and nearer.
Another refrain appears at ver. 25, to be taken up at ix. 12, 17, 21, x. 4
for which reason some critics have wished to place ix. 8—x. 4
25—26 of this chapter. The effect is, however, rather that of
dominant thought recurring at intervals; the resemblance between
the end of this chapter and that of ch. viii. is ummistakable.</p><pb n="128"/></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="220"><p>17. οἱ διηρπασμένα ὡς ταῦροι] Heb. ‘the lambs as (in) their
pasture,’ or ‘after their manner.’ Scholz explains the discrepancy
by mistakes of sound rather than of sight: διηρπασμένα as a form
from ΑΒΒREV ταῦροι as <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>Better, however, is to take it that LXX.
read <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>‘lambs,’ as pass. part. of νὴ), ‘trample,’ ‘subdue’; and
<foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>‘as their pasture,’ as <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>the plural of Ἶρι seems to be
avoided, as a rule.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>