There are remarkable assonances in the original of this verse:
‘judgment...oppression,’ mishpat, mispach; ‘righteousness...a city,’
tz’ dākah, tz’ ākah. These no translator could expect to reproduce
successfully. Compare ver. I of this chapter, kerem, ‘vineyard,’
qeren, ‘horn.’ Lowth gives a list of similar effects, xiii. 6, xxiv. 17
xxvii. 7, xxxiii. lvii. 6, lxi. 3, lxv. 11, 12. There are others, of perhaps
subtler character, recalling the alliterations of Virgil rather than of
Lucretius, a few letters recurring in various combinations. Chapters
xiv.. xvii., xxiv. are rich in these. Notice, e.g., the use of p, ABBREV 
xvii. 2; ABBREV in xxix. 5; γ and τ in xxv. 2–5. ἀνομίαν] It seems hardly needful to suppose that LXX. read ABBREV 
for ABBREV . ἔμεινα] The Ist person seems less natural here than in ver. 4
Vulg. however expectavi. 8. The danger to the character and welfare of a state, from
increasing luxury, which tends to separate the people into widely
distinct classes. Cf. Amos ii. 7, Micah ii. 2. See also Sallust, Catil. xx.

 
“Quis...tolerare potest...illos binas, aut amplius, domos continuare ?...
cum tabulas, signa, toreumata emunt, nova diruunt, alia aedificant”
Tacitus, Ann. 111. 53, “villarum infinita spatia”: the early chapters
Livy, book xxxxv. and Hon, Od. 11. xviii.
 “Quid, quod usque proximos ζRevellis agri terminos et ultra Limites clientium Salis avarus?’ 
or Οd. 111. i. 33 foll., xxiv. 3 (011.; a host of passages of like import
might be collected. ἵνα τοῦ πλησίον ἀφέλωνταί τι] The verb must be due to Lxx. having
read ABBREV ‘there be none’ as ABBREV perhaps ABBREV ‘they take
πλησίον might be ABBREV E ‘until,’ read as ABBREV E ‘neighbour’ but if ABBREV E was
represented by the conjunction, ABBREV might have been paraphrased,
or even read as ABBREV ‘from (one) near’: finally ABBREV ‘in
omitted, cf. xix. I, 14, &c.; and the interrogative may come
reading .1, sign of the passive causative (Hophal) in that sense.