<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="commentary" subtype="notes" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0527.tlg048.1st1K-eng1a" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="176"><p>1. ἀγαπημένῳ...ἀγαπητοῦ] The Heb. words are also different,
akin. Kay points out their connection with the names David and
Jedidiah (2 Sam. xii. 25); and the frequent use of the former word
in the Song of Solomon; not elsewhere. The mat. use ἠγαπημένοι·
also to render Heb. ‘Jeshurun’: see on xliv. 2.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="177"><p>[B inserts μου after ἀγαπητοῦ, with the Heb.]</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="178"><p>κέρατι] So the Heb. literally, by a very usual metaphor for a hill
or peak. Skinner compares the Alpine names, Matterhorn, Schreckhorn,
ἃς. Hill-tops and slopes seem specially favourable for vines,
as the names of many celebrated modern growths testify. Cf. Virg.
Georg. 11. 112, “Apertos Bacchus amat colles.” ἐν τόπῳ πίονι
phrases the bold Hebrew expression, for which cf. Zech. iv. 14.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="179"><p>2. περιέθηκα] The Hebrew does not turn to the ﬁrst person till
ver. 3.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="180"><p>ἄμπελον σωρὴχ] Lxx. transliterate ‘Sorek’ here, though not in
chap. xvi. 8, Gen. xlix. 11, Jerem. ii. 21. There was a valley of the
name in Philistia, Judg. xvi. 4, which perhaps gave its name to a
variety of vine. It is however generally translated ‘choice vine’
from the colour, according to Delitzsch, Cheyne.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>