<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:py="http://codespeak.net/lxml/objectify/pytype" py:pytype="TREE"><text><body><div type="commentary" subtype="notes" n="urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0527.tlg048.1st1K-eng1a" xml:lang="eng"><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="166"><p>ἐν πνεύματι κρίσεως] After these words, the clause καὶ πνεύματι
καύσεως is found in all MSS. except A, and 106, which not seldom
supports readings of A otherwise singular. We may compare Aesch.
Agam. 849.</p><lg><l>ἤτοι κεάντες ἦ τεμόντες</l><l>πειρασόμεσθα πήματος τρέψαι νόσον.</l></lg></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="167"><p>5. καὶ ἥξει, καὶ ἔσται] LXX. seem to have read <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>‘and
come’ for <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>‘and will create’: and <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>‘and it shall
<foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>‘the Lord.’ The sentence is then continued with
There is some resemblance to Psalm 1. 3.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="168"><p>πᾶς τόπος] The sentence is hardly grammatical as it stands; for if
πᾶς τόπος is the subject to ἔσται the clause appears unmeaning, and we
should expect πάντα τόπον as object to σκιάσει, ἔσται meaning merely
‘it shall be,’ i.e. come to pass, as for instance in vii. 18, 21, 23. But
σκιάσει is an addition of the LXX., and the sentence would be better
without it, περικύκλῳ being then nominative. As the text stands,
however, πᾶς τόπος is probably a cams pendent, ﬁlling the place of
another object to σκιάσει, and perhaps changed to the nom. by the
influence of ἔσται preceding, aided by the general influence
syntax.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="169"><p>τὰ περικύκλῳ] Either a paraphrase of Heb. ‘her assemblies,’ or
possibly a misreading of <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>as some form from the root <foreign xml:lang="abbr">ABBREV</foreign>.</p></div><div type="textpart" subtype="paragraph" n="170"><p>καπνοῦ] LXX., against Heb. accents, connects the smoke with the
ﬁre, and some authorities take the Heb. so. For the mention of smoke,
cf. Exod. xix. 18, Psalm xxviii. 8; Kay compares Song of Sol. iii. 6
and notices the absence of any mention of smoke in Exod. xl.
Numb. ix.</p></div></div></body></text></TEI>