Nearly every commentator, from Calvin onwards, quotes Lucan, Pizars. II. 342, “Da tantum nomen inaneConubii: liceat tumulo scripsisse, CatonisMarcia.’

2. After the threats, comes a promise of blessing, with sudden transition, δὲ being inserted by the Lxx. Both the evil and the good beyond it are unexpected, and in the main unheeded by the hearers.

λάμψει ὅ θεὸς] Heb. ‘the sprout of the LORD shall be....’ apparently takes the Greek as representing a verbal form from the same root ABBREVused for a ‘branch’ in Jer. xxiii. 5, xxxiii. 15, Zech. iii. 8, vi. 12, but not in lsai. xi. I. But surely the Lxx. read ABBREVthe rendered by ἔλαμψαν in Lam. iv. 7.

ἐν βουλῇ] This seems to be ABBREV‘beauty,’ ‘ornament,’ read interpreted as the Aramaic ABBREV‘purpose,’ Daniel vi. 17.

ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς] LXX. apparently omits ‘the fruit.’ Probably they read ABBREV as ABBREVpreceded by a preposition, ‘on the face οf...,’ perhaps, preferring to omit προσώπου. The syntax of the verse had become disarranged in their attempt, and ‘for pride and for beauty were now taken as infinitives.