Nearly every commentator, from Calvin onwards, quotes Lucan,
Pizars. II. 342,
 “Da tantum nomen inane Conubii: liceat tumulo scripsisse, Catonis Marcia.’ 2. After the threats, comes a promise of blessing, with sudden
transition, δὲ being inserted by the Lxx. Both the evil and the
good beyond it are unexpected, and in the main unheeded by the
hearers. λάμψει ὅ θεὸς] Heb. ‘the sprout of the LORD shall be....’
apparently takes the Greek as representing a verbal form from the
same root ABBREV used for a ‘branch’ in Jer. xxiii. 5, xxxiii. 15, Zech. iii.
8, vi. 12, but not in lsai. xi. I. But surely the Lxx. read ABBREV the
rendered by ἔλαμψαν in Lam. iv. 7. ἐν βουλῇ] This seems to be ABBREV ‘beauty,’ ‘ornament,’ read
interpreted as the Aramaic ABBREV ‘purpose,’ Daniel vi. 17. ἐπὶ τῆς γῆς] LXX. apparently omits ‘the fruit.’ Probably they read ABBREV 
as ABBREV preceded by a preposition, ‘on the face οf...,’ perhaps,
preferring to omit προσώπου. The syntax of the verse had
become disarranged in their attempt, and ‘for pride and for beauty
were now taken as infinitives.